TC
The Comparator

Arc A310 vs RX 6400 โ€” value comparison

Price data ยท US ยท USD ยท New ยท A 2026-08-13 ยท B 2026-08-13Coverage ยท 5 tracked new-offer records across both modelsBenchmark confidence ยท no estimate flags on these two recordsAffiliate links ยท We may earn a commission from these links. Scores are calculated separately using our methodology.
Checking today's pricesโ€ฆ This shared scoring frame includes an offer with a 24-hour freshness window, so price-derived results finish loading in your browser a moment from now. Capability, performance and verified specifications are already final.
02 ยท Decision matrix

One decision, three separate questions

Capability ignores price. Relative Value adds the current dataset offers and your priorities. Keeping them separate prevents a cheap product from being mistaken for the faster product.

Capability by task

Capability by task: Arc A310 versus RX 6400
ScenarioArc A310RX 6400
1080p GamingF#52F#51
1440p GamingF#52F#51
4K / VRF#52F#51
Ray Tracing @ 2K (1440p)F#50F#49
AI / Local LLMF#50F#52
3D RenderingN/AN/A
Light Use & EfficiencyS#1S#2

They grade identically in all 6 graded scenarios โ€” the tier table won't decide this one, so compare price and Value below. 1 scenario can't be graded for one of them (shown as N/A). These are the same Sโ€“F grades as the tier list โ€” capability only, price excluded. The value rows below add prices from the 2026-08-13 offer frame. How tiers are assigned โ†’

Crossover price is loading. The switch-over point and Strong Value threshold appear as soon as today's offer snapshots are confirmed in your browser.
04 ยท Capability

Capability indexes, side by side

Price is intentionally excluded here so the more capable product and the better-value product cannot be confused.

Raster performance 105
140
Ray tracing 74
112
AI (FP16 tensor) 53
42
A ยท Arc A310B ยท RX 6400GPU indexes share one 1000-point scale (RTX 4070 = 1000).
05 ยท Platform & ownership

Fit, compatibility and ownership context

Only verified structured fields are shown. Physical fit, connectors, cooling and typical warranty belong to the representative tracked partner card named in each column; other board variants can differ.

A ยท Arc A310

  • Representative offer variantSPARKLE Arc A310 ECO
  • Host interfacePCIe 4.0 x8
  • Suggested PSU250 W
  • Power connectorsNone
  • Card length156 mm
  • Expansion slots1-slot
  • Coolingair
  • Display outputs1ร— HDMI
  • Warranty (typical new)24 mo

B ยท RX 6400

  • Representative offer variantSapphire PULSE RX 6400
  • Host interfacePCIe 4.0 x4
  • Suggested PSU250 W
  • Power connectorsNone
  • Card length170 mm
  • Expansion slots1-slot
  • Coolingair
  • Display outputs1ร— HDMI ยท 1ร— DisplayPort
  • Warranty (typical new)24 mo
3-year electricity model

Over 3 years at 4h/day and $0.15/kWh, Arc A310 (50 W) adds about $16 in modeled electricity and RX 6400 (55 W) about $18. The modeled difference is roughly $2. This uses rated power as a common comparison input, not a promise of wall-power consumption.

06 ยท Specifications

Key specifications

Reference-GPU fields and representative-offer fields are labelled separately. Directional checkmarks appear only where more or less has a clear meaning; they are not an overall verdict.

Key specifications: Arc A310 versus RX 6400
SpecificationArc A310RX 6400
ArchitectureXe-HPGRDNA 2.0
VRAM4 GB4 GB
Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Memory bus64-bit64-bit
Host interfacePCIe 4.0 x8PCIe 4.0 x4
Boost clock2,000 MHz2,321 MHz
Board power (lower is better)50 Wโœ“55 W
Suggested PSU (representative offer)250 W250 W
Power connectors (representative offer)NoneNone
Card length (representative offer)156 mmโœ“170 mm
Warranty (representative offer)24 mo24 mo
Current dataset offer ยท NewCheck current price on Amazonsnapshot 2026-08-13$242snapshot 2026-08-13
Show additional verified specifications
Additional verified specifications: Arc A310 versus RX 6400
SpecificationArc A310RX 6400
Process node6 nm6 nm
Base clock2,000 MHz1,923 MHz
Memory data rate15.5 Gbps16 Gbps
Expansion slots (representative offer)1-slot1-slot
Cooling fans (representative offer)12
Display outputs (representative offer)1ร— HDMI1ร— HDMI ยท 1ร— DisplayPort
Cooling type (representative offer)airair

โ€œNot trackedโ€ means the source data does not contain a verified value; no default or guessed specification is substituted.

07 ยท Customize

Try other models and your own priorities

Presets are starting points. Swap either side, then open Advanced weights only if you want to tune the formula directly.

08 ยท Alternative

A third option worth checking

The same scenario and market frame checks whether another currently priced model offers a cleaner trade-off.

A price-aware third suggestion appears once today's offer snapshots are confirmed in your browser.
09 ยท Decision guide

Choose based on the trade-off you actually want

These are evidence-linked conditions, not universal buying verdicts. Feature ecosystems, software support and platform preferences remain your call.

Choose A ยท Arc A310 ifโ€ฆ

  • Lower rated power matters: 50 W versus 55 W for RX 6400.
Full Arc A310 analysis โ†’

Choose B ยท RX 6400 ifโ€ฆ

  • Its platform or feature fit matters more to you than the tracked scenario and price leads shown here.
Full RX 6400 analysis โ†’
10 ยท Methodology & FAQ

How to read this comparison

The formula is a weighted geometric ratio. Capability, price and user priorities stay visible as separate inputs so the result can be challenged and changed.

Read the methodology โ†’
Which one is more capable, ignoring price?
They grade identically in all 6 graded scenarios โ€” the tier table won't decide this one, so compare price and Value below. 1 scenario can't be graded for one of them (shown as N/A).
Where can I compare current offers for both?
Dated offer snapshots for both models are listed on their product pages (linked above); the interactive calculator recalculates both with your own weights and budget.

Offer frame: 2026-08-13 ยท dataset generated 2026-08-13 ยท formula gpu-value-v1 ยท Value Score is an estimate based on our current dataset, selected weights, market prices and methodology โ€” not an official product rating or a price forecast. Target prices are calculation thresholds, not predictions. Methodology ยท Report a data error