Retailer photo of ASUS TUF RX 7900 XT GAMING OC. View this offer in Where to buy
AMD · GPU · RX 7000
RX 7900 XT
The current RX 7900 XT price from retailers, its key specifications, and how it performs for each job.
Works well for: 1080p Gaming, 1440p Gaming, 4K / VR
Trade-offs: Current price sits $107 above the strong-value threshold (~$920)
- VRAM
- 20 GB
- Memory bandwidth
- 800 GB/s
- Board power
- 300 W
- Architecture
- RDNA 3.0
- Interface
- PCIe 4.0 x16
Move a slider and the page re-scores this product against the same market frame.
What does it cost today, and is that a good price?
Market confidence: MediumAt $1027 the RX 7900 XT is priced 6% below its $1094 representative market level. Only one retailer currently backs that price, so the level is a single data point rather than a market.
Limited market: only one retailer currently has a verified offer, so treat this price as a single data point.
Prices & availability
RX 7900 XT: current price and offers
Compare the offers we track for this model, across variants and retailers.
4 tracked offers · 1 retailers
| Variant | Store | Condition | Price (snapshot) | Value · Balanced | Checked | Offer link |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ASUS TUF RX 7900 XT GAMING OC | Newegg | New | $1,027 | 74 | 2026-10-11 | View offer → |
| GIGABYTE RX 7900 XT GAMING OC | Newegg | New | $1,089 | 71 | 2026-10-16 | View offer → |
| Sapphire PULSE RX 7900 XT | Newegg | New | $1,099 | 70 | 2026-10-16 | View offer → |
| ASUS TUF Gaming Radeon RX 7900 XT 20GB | Newegg | New | $1,300 | 62 | 2026-10-16 | View offer → |
| RX 7900 XTMultiple variants available | Amazon Affiliate | Varies | Find on Amazon | Not tracked | No price snapshot | Find on Amazon → |
Prices are dated snapshots, not live quotes — confirm the final price at the store. New, refurbished and used offers are listed separately; used offers carry warranty and seller risk.
Performance and where it ranks
Two different questions, side by side. Performance compares what the hardware can do; Value compares what that capability costs at today’s price. A product can rank high on one and low on the other — that gap is the point.
Performance Balanced
How much it can do. Price plays no part in this ranking.
#11 of 51 graded graphics cards
- #8 AMDRX 9070 XT 60
- #9 AMDRadeon AI Pro R9700 60
- #10 NVIDIARTX 5070 Ti 59
- #11 AMDRX 7900 XT 57
- #12 NVIDIARTX 4070 Ti Super 57
- #13 NVIDIARTX 3090 Ti 54
- #14 NVIDIARTX 5070 51
Value Balanced
How much of that you get for today’s price.
#14 of 52 currently priced graphics cards
- #11 IntelArc A580 77
- #12 NVIDIARTX 5060 76
- #13 NVIDIARTX 5070 Ti 76
- #14 AMDRX 7900 XT 74
- #15 AMDRX 7800 XT 71
- #16 NVIDIARTX 5080 71
- #17 NVIDIARTX 4070 69
Performance 1080p
How much it can do. Price plays no part in this ranking.
#11 of 51 graded graphics cards
- #8 AMDRX 9070 XT 60
- #9 AMDRadeon AI Pro R9700 60
- #10 NVIDIARTX 5070 Ti 59
- #11 AMDRX 7900 XT 57
- #12 NVIDIARTX 4070 Ti Super 57
- #13 NVIDIARTX 3090 Ti 54
- #14 NVIDIARTX 5070 51
Value 1080p
How much of that you get for today’s price.
#18 of 52 currently priced graphics cards
- #15 AMDRX 7800 XT 60
- #16 AMDRX 7700 XT 59
- #17 NVIDIARTX 4070 58
- #18 AMDRX 7900 XT 57
- #19 NVIDIARTX 5070 Ti 56
- #20 NVIDIARTX 3050 6GB 56
- #21 NVIDIARTX 4060 Ti 8GB 56
Performance 1440p
How much it can do. Price plays no part in this ranking.
#11 of 51 graded graphics cards
- #8 AMDRX 9070 XT 60
- #9 AMDRadeon AI Pro R9700 60
- #10 NVIDIARTX 5070 Ti 59
- #11 AMDRX 7900 XT 57
- #12 NVIDIARTX 4070 Ti Super 57
- #13 NVIDIARTX 3090 Ti 54
- #14 NVIDIARTX 5070 51
Value 1440p
How much of that you get for today’s price.
#9 of 52 currently priced graphics cards
- #6 NVIDIARTX 5070 74
- #7 NVIDIARTX 5080 73
- #8 IntelArc B580 69
- #9 AMDRX 7900 XT 69
- #10 AMDRX 9060 XT 8GB 66
- #11 AMDRX 7900 XTX 64
- #12 NVIDIARTX 5060 Ti 8GB 64
Performance 4K
How much it can do. Price plays no part in this ranking.
#11 of 51 graded graphics cards
- #8 AMDRX 9070 XT 60
- #9 AMDRadeon AI Pro R9700 60
- #10 NVIDIARTX 5070 Ti 59
- #11 AMDRX 7900 XT 57
- #12 NVIDIARTX 4070 Ti Super 57
- #13 NVIDIARTX 3090 Ti 54
- #14 NVIDIARTX 5070 51
Value 4K
How much of that you get for today’s price.
#8 of 52 currently priced graphics cards
- #5 NVIDIARTX 5070 Ti 70
- #6 AMDRX 7900 XTX 68
- #7 NVIDIARTX 4080 Super 62
- #8 AMDRX 7900 XT 61
- #9 NVIDIARTX 4090 61
- #10 NVIDIARTX 4070 Ti Super 60
- #11 NVIDIARTX 5070 58
Performance Ray Tracing @ 1080p
How much it can do. Price plays no part in this ranking.
#17 of 41 graded graphics cards
- #14 AMDRX 9070 54
- #15 NVIDIARTX 3090 53
- #16 NVIDIARTX 4070 51
- #17 AMDRX 7900 XT 49
- #18 AMDRX 9070 GRE 46
- #19 NVIDIARTX 5060 Ti 16GB 45
- #20 NVIDIARTX 3080 10GB 41
Value Ray Tracing @ 1080p
How much of that you get for today’s price.
#19 of 52 currently priced graphics cards
- #16 NVIDIARTX 4070 Ti 60
- #17 NVIDIARTX 5060 Ti 16GB 59
- #18 NVIDIARTX 4080 58
- #19 AMDRX 7900 XT 56
- #20 NVIDIARTX 5090 55
- #21 AMDRX 9060 XT 8GB 52
- #22 AMDRX 7800 XT 52
Performance Ray Tracing @ 1440p
How much it can do. Price plays no part in this ranking.
#16 of 43 graded graphics cards
- #13 AMDRX 9070 47
- #14 NVIDIARTX 3090 47
- #15 NVIDIARTX 4070 Super 43
- #16 AMDRX 7900 XT 43
- #17 NVIDIARTX 5060 Ti 16GB 39
- #18 NVIDIARTX 4070 38
- #19 AMDRX 9070 GRE 37
Value Ray Tracing @ 1440p
How much of that you get for today’s price.
#17 of 52 currently priced graphics cards
- #14 IntelArc B570 57
- #15 NVIDIARTX 4080 57
- #16 NVIDIARTX 4070 Ti 56
- #17 AMDRX 7900 XT 56
- #18 NVIDIARTX 5060 Ti 16GB 56
- #19 NVIDIARTX 4070 55
- #20 NVIDIARTX 5060 55
Performance Ray Tracing @ 4K
How much it can do. Price plays no part in this ranking.
#14 of 43 graded graphics cards
- #11 NVIDIARTX 3090 41
- #12 AMDRX 9070 40
- #13 NVIDIARTX 4070 Ti 37
- #14 AMDRX 7900 XT 36
- #15 NVIDIARTX 5070 35
- #16 NVIDIARTX 4070 Super 34
- #17 NVIDIARTX 5060 Ti 16GB 32
Value Ray Tracing @ 4K
How much of that you get for today’s price.
#12 of 52 currently priced graphics cards
- #9 NVIDIARTX 5070 54
- #10 AMDRX 7900 XTX 53
- #11 NVIDIARTX 4080 52
- #12 AMDRX 7900 XT 48
- #13 AMDRX 9070 GRE 47
- #14 AMDRX 9060 XT 16GB 47
- #15 NVIDIARTX 4070 Super 44
Performance AI
How much it can do. Price plays no part in this ranking.
#25 of 51 graded graphics cards
- #22 NVIDIARTX PRO 2000 Blackwell 16
- #23 NVIDIARTX 3060 Ti 15
- #24 AMDRX 7900 XTX 15
- #25 AMDRX 7900 XT 12
- #26 AMDRX 9060 XT 16GB 12
- #27 AMDRX 9060 XT 8GB 12
- #28 NVIDIARTX 3060 12GB 12
Value AI
How much of that you get for today’s price.
#24 of 52 currently priced graphics cards
- #21 NVIDIARTX 3080 10GB 15
- #22 NVIDIARTX PRO 2000 Blackwell 14
- #23 NVIDIARTX 5060 Ti 16GB 13
- #24 AMDRX 7900 XT 13
- #25 NVIDIARTX 4060 Ti 8GB 13
- #26 NVIDIARTX PRO 4500 Blackwell 13
- #27 NVIDIARTX 2000 Ada 13
Performance 3D Rendering
How much it can do. Price plays no part in this ranking.
#19 of 39 graded graphics cards
- #16 NVIDIARTX 5060 Ti 16GB 28
- #17 NVIDIARTX 5060 Ti 8GB 28
- #18 AMDRX 7900 XTX 27
- #19 AMDRX 7900 XT 24
- #20 NVIDIARTX 5060 24
- #21 NVIDIARTX 3070 Ti 23
- #22 NVIDIARTX 4060 23
Value 3D Rendering
How much of that you get for today’s price.
#24 of 52 currently priced graphics cards
- #21 NVIDIARTX 4060 Ti 8GB 21
- #22 AMDRX 7900 XTX 18
- #23 NVIDIARTX 3070 Ti 17
- #24 AMDRX 7900 XT 17
- #25 AMDRX 9060 XT 8GB 16
- #26 NVIDIARTX 5060 Ti 16GB 16
- #27 NVIDIARTX 5060 Ti 8GB 15
Performance Light Use
How much it can do. Price plays no part in this ranking.
#40 of 50 graded graphics cards
- #37 NVIDIARTX 4070 Ti 48
- #38 NVIDIARTX 3070 Ti 46
- #39 NVIDIARTX 5070 Ti 44
- #40 AMDRX 7900 XT 44
- #41 AMDRadeon AI Pro R9700 44
- #42 AMDRX 9070 XT 43
- #43 NVIDIARTX 4080 39
Value Light Use
How much of that you get for today’s price.
#41 of 52 currently priced graphics cards
- #38 AMDRX 7900 GRE 14
- #39 NVIDIARTX 4070 Ti 13
- #40 NVIDIARTX 3070 Ti 13
- #41 AMDRX 7900 XT 12
- #42 NVIDIARTX 5080 11
- #43 AMDRadeon AI Pro R9700 11
- #44 NVIDIARTX 4080 Super 11
These ladders follow the preset scenario shown above. Your own weights re-score this product, not the whole field.
What it is good for
| Scenario | this productCapability grade · Value at current price | Higher capability | Higher Value with current priorities |
|---|---|---|---|
| Balanced (all-round)Weighted all-round view | GradeNo grade Value74 | Higher capability Higher capability · Higher Value with current priorities RX 9070 XT 100 +5% capability · -22% price | |
| 1080p GamingRaster performance · 1080p | GradeS Value57 | Higher capability Higher capability · Higher Value with current priorities RX 9070 XT S 84 +5% capability · -22% price | |
| 1440p GamingRaster performance · 1440p | GradeS Value69 | Higher capability Higher capability · Higher Value with current priorities RX 9070 XT S 100 +5% capability · -22% price | |
| 4K / VRRaster performance · 4K / VR | GradeA Value61 | Higher capability Higher capability · Higher Value with current priorities RX 9070 XT A 84 +5% capability · -22% price | |
| Ray Tracing @ 1080pRay tracing capability · 1080p | GradeA Value56 | Higher capability RTX 5070 Ti S 76 +47% capability · +15% price | Higher Value with current priorities RX 9070 XT A 100 +26% capability · -22% price |
| Ray Tracing @ 1440pRay tracing capability · 1440p | GradeC Value56 | Higher capability RTX 5070 Ti A 76 +52% capability · +15% price | Higher Value with current priorities RX 9070 XT B 100 +28% capability · -22% price |
| Ray Tracing @ 4KRay tracing capability · 4K | GradeD Value48 | Higher capability RTX 5070 Ti C 65 +59% capability · +15% price | Higher Value with current priorities RX 9070 XT C 77 +30% capability · -22% price |
| AI / Local LLMAI compute · memory and ecosystem fit | GradeB Value13 | Higher capability RTX 5070 Ti A 42 +241% capability · +15% price | Higher Value with current priorities RX 9070 XT B 27 ⚠ not a drop-in swap +89% capability · -22% price |
| 3D Rendering3D rendering · creator workloads | GradeC Value17 | Higher capability RTX 5070 Ti A 58 +113% capability · +15% price | Higher Value with current priorities RX 9070 XT C 41 ⚠ not a drop-in swap -7% capability · -22% price |
| Light Use & EfficiencyEfficiency · lighter workloads | GradeC Value12 | Higher capability RTX 3050 6GB S 97 +128% capability · -70% price | Higher Value with current priorities Arc A380 S 100 +125% capability · -84% price |
Balanced has no letter: it is a weighting preset, not a capability rubric. A grade answers “how well does this handle that job?” — price is never part of it. Relative Value puts the current market price back in.
Compare these grades with the full tier list
Browse shortlists for different uses
Trade-offs
Works well if
- 1080p Gaming is your main prioritygraded S for 1080p Gaming on the same rubric as the tier list
- Strong-value threshold: ~$920$920 is where Relative Value reaches 80 with Balanced priorities, in the 2026-10-10–2026-10-16 offer frame
- You want memory headroom — memory is not what limits it hereno memory cap applies to this grade — the raster index sets it, not the frame buffer
Consider other options if
- Current price sits $107 above the strong-value threshold (~$920)cheapest tracked $1027 against a $920 calculated threshold with Balanced priorities
- Value for money matters more to you than this exact modelRX 9070 XT holds Relative Value 100 against its 74 with Balanced priorities, at $800
- Ray Tracing @ 2K (1440p) is what you actually need it forit grades only C there
Works well if
- 1080p is your main priority — S here means 144 Hz+ ultra with headroomgraded S for 1080p on the same rubric as the tier list
- Strong-value threshold: ~$726$726 is where Relative Value reaches 80 for 1080p, in the 2026-10-10–2026-10-16 offer frame
- You want memory headroom — 20 GB is above what this job needsthe same card with 8 GB grades A for 1080p; this one has 20 GB and hits no memory cap
Consider other options if
- Current price sits $301 above the strong-value threshold (~$726)cheapest tracked $1027 against a $726 calculated threshold for 1080p
- Value for money matters more to you than this exact modelRX 9070 XT holds Relative Value 84 against its 57 for 1080p, at $800
- Ray Tracing @ 2K (1440p) is what you actually need it forit grades only C there
Works well if
- 1440p is your main prioritygraded S for 1440p on the same rubric as the tier list
- Strong-value threshold: ~$850$850 is where Relative Value reaches 80 for 1440p, in the 2026-10-10–2026-10-16 offer frame
- You want memory headroom — 20 GB is above what this job needsthe same card with 12 GB grades A for 1440p; this one has 20 GB and hits no memory cap
Consider other options if
- Current price sits $177 above the strong-value threshold (~$850)cheapest tracked $1027 against a $850 calculated threshold for 1440p
- Value for money matters more to you than this exact modelRX 9070 XT holds Relative Value 100 against its 69 for 1440p, at $800
- Ray Tracing @ 2K (1440p) is what you actually need it forit grades only C there
Works well if
- 4K is your main prioritygraded A for 4K on the same rubric as the tier list
- You want memory headroom — 20 GB is above what this job needsthe same card with 12 GB grades B for 4K; this one has 20 GB and hits no memory cap
- FSR 3.1 with frame generation matters to youtemporal upscaler + frame generation, not ML-based — derived from the rdna3 architecture, not from a scraped feature flag
Consider other options if
- You want strong value for 4K specificallyat today's market no realistic price for this model reaches strong value for 4K — the calculation only gets there near $565, against a cheapest tracked $1027
- Value for money matters more to you than this exact modelRX 9070 XT holds Relative Value 84 against its 61 for 4K, at $800
- Ray Tracing @ 2K (1440p) is what you actually need it forit grades only C there
Works well if
- Ray Tracing @ 1080p is your main priority — A here means playablegraded A for Ray Tracing @ 1080p on the same rubric as the tier list, from 62 fps measured natively (upscaling typically adds 40–60% on top)
- You want memory headroom — memory is not what limits it hereno memory cap applies to this grade for Ray Tracing @ 1080p — the raster index sets it, not the frame buffer
- FSR 3.1 with frame generation matters to youtemporal upscaler + frame generation, not ML-based — derived from the rdna3 architecture, not from a scraped feature flag
Consider other options if
- You want strong value for Ray Tracing @ 1080p specificallyat today's market no realistic price for this model reaches strong value for Ray Tracing @ 1080p — the calculation only gets there near $621, against a cheapest tracked $1027
- Value for money matters more to you than this exact modelRX 9070 XT holds Relative Value 100 against its 56 for Ray Tracing @ 1080p, at $800
- Ray Tracing @ 2K (1440p) is what you actually need it forit grades only C there
For the selected scenario this is not a strong fit — the grade above is the reason, and the models below suit it better.
Works well if
- Ray Tracing @ 1440p is not actually your main job — 1080p Gaming isit grades C for Ray Tracing @ 1440p, but S for 1080p Gaming
Consider other options if
- Ray Tracing @ 1440p is what you actually need it forit grades C there; RTX 5070 Ti grades A at $1180
- You want strong value for Ray Tracing @ 1440p specificallyat today's market no realistic price for this model reaches strong value for Ray Tracing @ 1440p — the calculation only gets there near $620, against a cheapest tracked $1027
- Value for money matters more to you than this exact modelRX 9070 XT holds Relative Value 100 against its 56 for Ray Tracing @ 1440p, at $800
For the selected scenario this is not a strong fit — the grade above is the reason, and the models below suit it better.
Works well if
- Ray Tracing @ 4K is not actually your main job — 1080p Gaming isit grades D for Ray Tracing @ 4K, but S for 1080p Gaming
Consider other options if
- Ray Tracing @ 4K is what you actually need it forit grades D there; RTX 5070 Ti grades C at $1180
- You want strong value for Ray Tracing @ 4K specificallyat today's market no realistic price for this model reaches strong value for Ray Tracing @ 4K — the calculation only gets there near $287, against a cheapest tracked $1027
- Value for money matters more to you than this exact modelRX 9070 XT holds Relative Value 77 against its 48 for Ray Tracing @ 4K, at $800
Works well if
- AI is your main prioritygraded B for AI on the same rubric as the tier list
- You want memory headroom — 20 GB is above what this job needsthe same card with 10 GB grades C for AI; this one has 20 GB and hits no memory cap
- FSR 3.1 with frame generation matters to youtemporal upscaler + frame generation, not ML-based — derived from the rdna3 architecture, not from a scraped feature flag
Consider other options if
- You want strong value for AI specificallycompeting products deliver so much more for AI per dollar that no price this model realistically trades at reaches the strong-value mark for this job
- Value for money matters more to you than this exact modelRX 9070 XT holds Relative Value 27 against its 13 for AI, at $800
- Ray Tracing @ 2K (1440p) is what you actually need it forit grades only C there
For the selected scenario this is not a strong fit — the grade above is the reason, and the models below suit it better.
Works well if
- 3D Rendering is not actually your main job — 1080p Gaming isit grades C for 3D Rendering, but S for 1080p Gaming
Consider other options if
- 3D Rendering is what you actually need it forit grades C there; RTX 5070 Ti grades A at $1180
- You want strong value for 3D Rendering specificallycompeting products deliver so much more for 3D Rendering per dollar that no price this model realistically trades at reaches the strong-value mark for this job
- Value for money matters more to you than this exact modelRX 9070 XT holds Relative Value 41 against its 17 for 3D Rendering, at $800
For the selected scenario this is not a strong fit — the grade above is the reason, and the models below suit it better.
Works well if
- Light Use is not actually your main job — 1080p Gaming isit grades C for Light Use, but S for 1080p Gaming
Consider other options if
- Light Use is what you actually need it forit grades C there; RTX 3050 6GB grades S at $307
- You want strong value for Light Use specificallycompeting products deliver so much more for Light Use per dollar that no price this model realistically trades at reaches the strong-value mark for this job
- Value for money matters more to you than this exact modelArc A380 holds Relative Value 100 against its 12 for Light Use, at $160
Every line states the fact it was derived from, for the scenario selected above. Thresholds are calculated points on our value curve — information about where the maths turns, not instructions about what to pay.
Similar options to the RX 7900 XT
Chosen for Balanced
Chosen for 1080p
Chosen for 1440p
Chosen for 4K
Chosen for Ray Tracing @ 1080p
Chosen for Ray Tracing @ 1440p
Chosen for Ray Tracing @ 4K
Chosen for AI
This scenario carries a requirement candidates are checked against first: CUDA — Many local-LLM and diffusion toolchains are CUDA-only. ROCm and Vulkan builds exist and work, but they are not drop-in — check your toolchain before treating a non-NVIDIA card as an equivalent swap.
Chosen for 3D Rendering
This scenario carries a requirement candidates are checked against first: OptiX — Blender Cycles reaches its fastest path on NVIDIA OptiX. HIP (AMD) and oneAPI (Intel) render the same scenes, so this is a workflow question, not a capability wall — but render times and add-on support differ.
Chosen for Light Use
Alternatives stay near this product’s price range. Step-up options may exceed the standard budget envelope when the capability gain is meaningful.
More head-to-head comparisons in this category
Upgrade planner
Judge the change in the active scenario, then make the cash gap explicit.
Using page scenarioWhat are you upgrading from? These are the axes we compare on, and where this product stands in the current market.
We rank upgrades by out-of-pocket cost — the new price minus what yours is worth — not by sticker price.
Only candidates that clear the configured meaningful-upgrade gate will be shown; roles are omitted rather than filled.
Capability differences are expressed as tiers and index points, not as benchmark percentages we did not measure.
Specifications and compatibility
What this product is, and what to check before it goes into your build.
Core / Performance
- Architecture
- RDNA 3.0
- GPU chip
- Navi 31
- GPU variant
- Navi 31 XT (215-145000156)
- Process node
- 5 nm
- Transistors
- 57,700 million
- Shading units
- 5376
Memory
- Capacity
- 20 GB
- Type
- GDDR6
- Bus width
- 320 bit
- Effective speed
- 20 Gbps
- Bandwidth
- 800 GB/s
Power / Interface
- Board power (TBP)
- 300 W
- Power connector
- Varies by version
- Recommended PSU
- Varies by version
- Bus interface
- PCIe 4.0 x16
Physical / Outputs
- Length
- Varies by version313–353 mm across tracked variants
- Height
- Varies by version134–158 mm across tracked variants
- Width
- Varies by version
- Slot thickness
- Varies by version2–4 across tracked variants
- Fans
- Varies by version2–3 across tracked variants
- Cooling
- Varies by version
- Outputs
- Varies by version
Power / Interface
- Board power (TBP)
- 300 W
- Power connector
- 3x 8-pin
- Recommended PSU
- 700 W
- Bus interface
- PCIe 4.0 x16
Physical / Outputs
- Length
- 353 mm
- Height
- 158 mm
- Width
- Unknown
- Slot thickness
- 4 slots
- Fans
- 3
- Cooling
- Air
- Outputs
- 3× DisplayPort · 1× HDMI
Exact board / Identity
- Board part number
- TUF-RX7900XT-O20G-GAMING
- Vendor warranty
- 3 years
Power / Interface
- Board power (TBP)
- 300 W
- Power connector
- 2x 8-pin
- Recommended PSU
- 700 W
- Bus interface
- PCIe 4.0 x16
Physical / Outputs
- Length
- 331 mm
- Height
- 138 mm
- Width
- Unknown
- Slot thickness
- 2 slots
- Fans
- 3
- Cooling
- Air
- Outputs
- 2× DisplayPort · 2× HDMI
Exact board / Identity
- Board part number
- GV-R79XTGAMING OC-20GD
- Vendor warranty
- 3 years
Power / Interface
- Board power (TBP)
- 300 W
- Power connector
- 2x 8-pin
- Recommended PSU
- 700 W
- Bus interface
- PCIe 4.0 x16
Physical / Outputs
- Length
- 313 mm
- Height
- 134 mm
- Width
- Unknown
- Slot thickness
- 3 slots
- Fans
- 2
- Cooling
- Air
- Outputs
- 2× DisplayPort · 2× HDMI
Exact board / Identity
- Board part number
- 11323-02-20G
- Vendor warranty
- 2 years
Power / Interface
- Board power (TBP)
- 300 W
- Power connector
- 2x 8-pin
- Recommended PSU
- 700 W
- Bus interface
- PCIe 4.0 x16
Physical / Outputs
- Length
- Unknown
- Height
- Unknown
- Width
- Unknown
- Slot thickness
- Unknown
- Fans
- Unknown
- Cooling
- Air
- Outputs
- Unknown
Exact board / Identity
- Board part number
- TUF-RX7900XT-20G-GAMING
- Vendor warranty
- 3 years
Select an exact version for physical dimensions and connector details.
Show all specifications
Core / Performance
- Texture units
- 336
- ROPs
- 192
- Ray tracing cores
- 84
- Tensor cores
- 0
- Base clock
- 1687 MHz
- Boost clock
- 2499 MHz
Features
- Upscaling
- FSR 3.1
- Frame generation
- frame generation
- Ray tracing
- Supported
- RGB lighting
- No
Warranty & release
- Release year
- 2022
Hover any value to see where it came from: a manufacturer specification, or a figure The Comparator calculated.
Sources: Comparator offer frame 2026-10-10–2026-10-16
What to check in your build
Varies by version
The exact requirement depends on the version you select.
Varies by version
Select a board to confirm its connector and cable-clearance needs.
Varies by version
The exact requirement depends on the version you select.
Varies by version
The exact requirement depends on the version you select.
Varies by version
Slot occupancy depends on the board cooler and thickness.
Select an exact version above for physical dimensions and connector details.
700 W PSU recommended
Whole-system figure from the board vendor — it already allows for the processor and transient spikes.
3x 8-pin required
Adapters work but add connector bulk and need extra cable-bend clearance.
Needs at least 353 mm of GPU clearance
Front radiators and fans eat into the figure a case advertises.
Leave room beyond the card for the cable bend
No verified minimum is published — measure it.
Occupies 4 slots
The cooler covers the slots below it — check nothing adjacent needs that space.
700 W PSU recommended
Whole-system figure from the board vendor — it already allows for the processor and transient spikes.
2x 8-pin required
Adapters work but add connector bulk and need extra cable-bend clearance.
Needs at least 331 mm of GPU clearance
Front radiators and fans eat into the figure a case advertises.
Leave room beyond the card for the cable bend
No verified minimum is published — measure it.
Occupies 2 slots
The cooler covers the slots below it — check nothing adjacent needs that space.
700 W PSU recommended
Whole-system figure from the board vendor — it already allows for the processor and transient spikes.
2x 8-pin required
Adapters work but add connector bulk and need extra cable-bend clearance.
Needs at least 313 mm of GPU clearance
Front radiators and fans eat into the figure a case advertises.
Leave room beyond the card for the cable bend
No verified minimum is published — measure it.
Occupies 3 slots
The cooler covers the slots below it — check nothing adjacent needs that space.
700 W PSU recommended
Whole-system figure from the board vendor — it already allows for the processor and transient spikes.
2x 8-pin required
Adapters work but add connector bulk and need extra cable-bend clearance.
Unknown
Leave room beyond the card for the cable bend
No verified minimum is published — measure it.
Unknown
Compare all 4 board variants
| Variant | Length | Slot thickness | Power connector | Recommended PSU |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ASUS TUF RX 7900 XT GAMING OC | 353 mm | 4 | 3x 8-pin | 700 W |
| GIGABYTE RX 7900 XT GAMING OC | 331 mm | 2 | 2x 8-pin | 700 W |
| Sapphire PULSE RX 7900 XT | 313 mm | 3 | 2x 8-pin | 700 W |
| ASUS TUF Gaming Radeon RX 7900 XT 20GB | Unknown | Unknown | 2x 8-pin | 700 W |
Found an error? Report this specification Email the field, corrected value and an optional source.
Compatibility guidance is practical help, not a score. Missing data is shown as unknown, never invented.
Summary
RX 7900 XT offers a balanced view across an all-round mix of priorities. It ranks #11 by capability in the current modelled field. Its clearest measured strength is raster index 1350. The main limitation appears when Ray Tracing @ 2K (1440p) becomes the priority, where it grades C.
RX 7900 XT offers S-grade capability for 1080p. It ranks #11 by capability in the current modelled field. Its clearest measured strength is raster index 1350. The main limitation appears when Ray Tracing @ 2K (1440p) becomes the priority, where it grades C.
RX 7900 XT offers S-grade capability for 1440p. It ranks #11 by capability in the current modelled field. Its clearest measured strength is raster index 1350. The main limitation appears when Ray Tracing @ 2K (1440p) becomes the priority, where it grades C.
RX 7900 XT offers A-grade capability for 4K. It ranks #11 by capability in the current modelled field. Its clearest measured strength is raster index 1350. The main limitation appears when Ray Tracing @ 2K (1440p) becomes the priority, where it grades C.
RX 7900 XT offers A-grade capability for Ray Tracing @ 1080p. It ranks #17 by capability in the current modelled field. Its clearest measured strength is ray-tracing index 1093. RX 9070 XT currently clears the same practical bar with stronger Relative Value.
RX 7900 XT offers C-grade capability for Ray Tracing @ 1440p. It ranks #16 by capability in the current modelled field. Its clearest measured strength is ray-tracing index 1093. The C grade is the decisive limitation for this workload.
RX 7900 XT offers D-grade capability for Ray Tracing @ 4K. It ranks #14 by capability in the current modelled field. Its clearest measured strength is ray-tracing index 1093. The D grade is the decisive limitation for this workload.
RX 7900 XT offers B-grade capability for AI. It ranks #25 by capability in the current modelled field. Its clearest measured strength is ai compute index 442. RX 9070 XT currently clears the same practical bar with stronger Relative Value.
RX 7900 XT offers C-grade capability for 3D Rendering. It ranks #19 by capability in the current modelled field. Its clearest measured strength is raster index 1350. The C grade is the decisive limitation for this workload.
RX 7900 XT offers C-grade capability for Light Use. It ranks #40 by capability in the current modelled field. Its clearest measured strength is raster index 1350. The C grade is the decisive limitation for this workload.
FAQ
Do all RX 7900 XT boards have the same physical design?
No. Dimensions, slot thickness, cooling, power connectors and display outputs belong to the exact board. Use the Exact version selector before checking case or PSU fit.
How much case clearance should I allow for the RX 7900 XT?
Tracked boards range from 313 to 353 mm in length. Select the exact board, then also allow for front radiators or fans, card height, slot thickness and power-cable bend; length alone does not guarantee fit.
Do all RX 7900 XT boards use the same power connector?
No. Tracked versions use 3x 8-pin or 2x 8-pin. The connector shown in Specifications & compatibility changes with the exact board selection.
Why does Relative Value change when I choose another scenario?
Each scenario changes the weights applied to capability, price and the other published factors. The hardware facts stay fixed, but the value question changes, so its score and rank can change too.
Useful links & sources
offer frame 2026-10-10–2026-10-16 · formula gpu-value-v1.4 · facts facts-2026-10-16 · Relative Value is an estimate from our current dataset, the selected weights and dated market prices — not an official product rating and not a price forecast. Target prices are calculation thresholds, not predictions. Methodology We are not a shop. Affiliate links may earn us a commission; they never change the calculations or the ranking.