Retailer photo of GIGABYTE RTX 5090 WINDFORCE OC. View this offer in Where to buy
NVIDIA · GPU · RTX 50
RTX 5090
The current RTX 5090 price from retailers, its key specifications, and how it performs for each job.
Works well for: 1080p Gaming, 1440p Gaming, 4K / VR
Trade-offs: you want strong value with Balanced priorities specifically
- VRAM
- 32 GB
- Memory bandwidth
- 1792 GB/s
- Board power
- 575 W
- Architecture
- Blackwell 2.0
- Interface
- PCIe 5.0 x16
Move a slider and the page re-scores this product against the same market frame.
What does it cost today, and is that a good price?
Market confidence: HighAt $5400 the RTX 5090 is priced 14% below its $6243 representative market level. Nothing in the current frame clears the same bar for less.
Price looks competitive: the cheapest verified offer is 14% below the current representative level.
Prices & availability
RTX 5090: current price and offers
Compare the offers we track for this model, across variants and retailers.
8 tracked offers · 2 retailers
Dated price snapshots: $5,400–$9,988
Prices are dated snapshots, not live quotes — confirm the final price at the store. New, refurbished and used offers are listed separately; used offers carry warranty and seller risk.
Performance and where it ranks
Two different questions, side by side. Performance compares what the hardware can do; Value compares what that capability costs at today’s price. A product can rank high on one and low on the other — that gap is the point.
Performance Balanced
How much it can do. Price plays no part in this ranking.
#1 of 51 graded graphics cards
- #1 NVIDIARTX 5090 100
- #2 NVIDIARTX 4090 82
- #3 NVIDIARTX 5080 71
- #4 AMDRX 7900 XTX 67
- #5 NVIDIARTX PRO 4000 Blackwell 67
- #6 NVIDIARTX 4080 Super 62
- #7 NVIDIARTX 4080 61
Value Balanced
How much of that you get for today’s price.
#39 of 52 currently priced graphics cards
- #36 NVIDIARTX 3060 Ti 50
- #37 NVIDIARTX 3060 12GB 49
- #38 AMDRadeon AI Pro R9700 48
- #39 NVIDIARTX 5090 45
- #40 IntelArc A770 43
- #41 NVIDIARTX 2000 Ada 41
- #42 NVIDIARTX PRO 2000 Blackwell 41
Performance 1080p
How much it can do. Price plays no part in this ranking.
#1 of 51 graded graphics cards
- #1 NVIDIARTX 5090 100
- #2 NVIDIARTX 4090 82
- #3 NVIDIARTX 5080 71
- #4 AMDRX 7900 XTX 67
- #5 NVIDIARTX PRO 4000 Blackwell 67
- #6 NVIDIARTX 4080 Super 62
- #7 NVIDIARTX 4080 61
Value 1080p
How much of that you get for today’s price.
#48 of 52 currently priced graphics cards
- #45 NVIDIARTX 3050 8GB 30
- #46 NVIDIARTX PRO 4000 Blackwell 27
- #47 NVIDIARTX 3090 Ti 22
- #48 NVIDIARTX 5090 21
- #49 NVIDIAGTX 1650 20
- #50 NVIDIARTX 3090 19
- #51 NVIDIARTX 4090 18
Performance 1440p
How much it can do. Price plays no part in this ranking.
#1 of 51 graded graphics cards
- #1 NVIDIARTX 5090 100
- #2 NVIDIARTX 4090 82
- #3 NVIDIARTX 5080 71
- #4 AMDRX 7900 XTX 67
- #5 NVIDIARTX PRO 4000 Blackwell 67
- #6 NVIDIARTX 4080 Super 62
- #7 NVIDIARTX 4080 61
Value 1440p
How much of that you get for today’s price.
#24 of 52 currently priced graphics cards
- #21 NVIDIARTX 4070 Ti 56
- #22 IntelArc A750 55
- #23 NVIDIARTX 4080 55
- #24 NVIDIARTX 5090 53
- #25 AMDRX 7700 XT 53
- #26 NVIDIARTX 3080 10GB 49
- #27 IntelArc A580 49
Performance 4K
How much it can do. Price plays no part in this ranking.
#1 of 51 graded graphics cards
- #1 NVIDIARTX 5090 100
- #2 NVIDIARTX 4090 82
- #3 NVIDIARTX 5080 71
- #4 AMDRX 7900 XTX 67
- #5 NVIDIARTX PRO 4000 Blackwell 67
- #6 NVIDIARTX 4080 Super 62
- #7 NVIDIARTX 4080 61
Value 4K
How much of that you get for today’s price.
#1 of 52 currently priced graphics cards
- #1 NVIDIARTX 5090 100
- #2 AMDRX 9070 XT 84
- #3 NVIDIARTX 5080 78
- #4 AMDRX 9070 70
- #5 NVIDIARTX 5070 Ti 70
- #6 AMDRX 7900 XTX 68
- #7 NVIDIARTX 4080 Super 62
Performance Ray Tracing @ 1080p
How much it can do. Price plays no part in this ranking.
#1 of 41 graded graphics cards
- #1 NVIDIARTX 5090 100
- #2 NVIDIARTX 4090 89
- #3 NVIDIARTX 5080 78
- #4 NVIDIARTX 4080 Super 75
- #5 NVIDIARTX 4080 74
- #6 NVIDIARTX 5070 Ti 72
- #7 NVIDIARTX 4070 Ti Super 70
Value Ray Tracing @ 1080p
How much of that you get for today’s price.
#20 of 52 currently priced graphics cards
- #17 NVIDIARTX 5060 Ti 16GB 59
- #18 NVIDIARTX 4080 58
- #19 AMDRX 7900 XT 56
- #20 NVIDIARTX 5090 55
- #21 AMDRX 7800 XT 53
- #22 AMDRX 9060 XT 8GB 52
- #23 IntelArc A750 52
Performance Ray Tracing @ 1440p
How much it can do. Price plays no part in this ranking.
#1 of 43 graded graphics cards
- #1 NVIDIARTX 5090 100
- #2 NVIDIARTX 4090 87
- #3 NVIDIARTX 5080 73
- #4 NVIDIARTX 4080 Super 69
- #5 NVIDIARTX 4080 68
- #6 NVIDIARTX 5070 Ti 66
- #7 NVIDIARTX 4070 Ti Super 60
Value Ray Tracing @ 1440p
How much of that you get for today’s price.
#11 of 52 currently priced graphics cards
- #8 IntelArc B580 68
- #9 NVIDIARTX 4080 Super 64
- #10 NVIDIARTX 4070 Ti Super 62
- #11 NVIDIARTX 5090 62
- #12 NVIDIARTX 5060 Ti 8GB 61
- #13 NVIDIARTX 4070 Super 59
- #14 IntelArc B570 57
Performance Ray Tracing @ 4K
How much it can do. Price plays no part in this ranking.
#1 of 43 graded graphics cards
- #1 NVIDIARTX 5090 100
- #2 NVIDIARTX 4090 81
- #3 NVIDIARTX 5080 66
- #4 NVIDIARTX 4080 Super 60
- #5 NVIDIARTX 4080 58
- #6 NVIDIARTX 5070 Ti 57
- #7 NVIDIARTX 4070 Ti Super 50
Value Ray Tracing @ 4K
How much of that you get for today’s price.
#1 of 52 currently priced graphics cards
- #1 NVIDIARTX 5090 100
- #2 AMDRX 9070 XT 77
- #3 NVIDIARTX 5080 74
- #4 NVIDIARTX 5070 Ti 66
- #5 AMDRX 9070 66
- #6 NVIDIARTX 4080 Super 60
- #7 NVIDIARTX 4090 58
Performance AI
How much it can do. Price plays no part in this ranking.
#1 of 51 graded graphics cards
- #1 NVIDIARTX 5090 100
- #2 NVIDIARTX 4090 79
- #3 NVIDIARTX 5080 54
- #4 NVIDIARTX 4080 Super 50
- #5 NVIDIARTX 4080 48
- #6 NVIDIARTX 4070 Ti Super 42
- #7 NVIDIARTX 5070 Ti 42
Value AI
How much of that you get for today’s price.
#1 of 52 currently priced graphics cards
- #1 NVIDIARTX 5090 100
- #2 NVIDIARTX 4090 55
- #3 NVIDIARTX 5080 47
- #4 NVIDIARTX 5070 Ti 42
- #5 NVIDIARTX 4080 Super 41
- #6 NVIDIARTX PRO 4000 Blackwell 39
- #7 NVIDIARTX 4070 Ti Super 38
Performance 3D Rendering
How much it can do. Price plays no part in this ranking.
#1 of 39 graded graphics cards
- #1 NVIDIARTX 5090 100
- #2 NVIDIARTX 4090 85
- #3 NVIDIARTX 5080 61
- #4 NVIDIARTX 4080 56
- #5 NVIDIARTX 4080 Super 55
- #6 NVIDIARTX 5070 Ti 51
- #7 NVIDIARTX 4070 Ti 49
Value 3D Rendering
How much of that you get for today’s price.
#1 of 52 currently priced graphics cards
- #1 NVIDIARTX 5090 100
- #2 NVIDIARTX 5080 68
- #3 NVIDIARTX 4090 59
- #4 NVIDIARTX 5070 Ti 59
- #5 NVIDIARTX 4080 Super 56
- #6 NVIDIARTX 4070 Ti Super 52
- #7 NVIDIARTX 4080 48
Value Light Use
How much of that you get for today’s price.
#50 of 52 currently priced graphics cards
- #46 NVIDIARTX 4080 8
- #47 AMDRX 7900 XTX 8
- #48 NVIDIARTX 3090 Ti 4
- #49 NVIDIARTX 3090 4
- #50 NVIDIARTX 5090 3
- #51 NVIDIARTX 4090 3
- #52 NVIDIARTX PRO 4500 Blackwell 0
These ladders follow the preset scenario shown above. Your own weights re-score this product, not the whole field.
What it is good for
| Scenario | this productCapability grade · Value at current price | Higher Value with current priorities |
|---|---|---|
| Balanced (all-round)Weighted all-round view | GradeNo grade Value45 | — |
| 1080p GamingRaster performance · 1080p | GradeS Value21 | — |
| 1440p GamingRaster performance · 1440p | GradeS Value53 | — |
| 4K / VRRaster performance · 4K / VR | GradeS Value100 | — |
| Ray Tracing @ 1080pRay tracing capability · 1080p | GradeS Value55 | — |
| Ray Tracing @ 1440pRay tracing capability · 1440p | GradeS Value62 | — |
| Ray Tracing @ 4KRay tracing capability · 4K | GradeA Value100 | — |
| AI / Local LLMAI compute · memory and ecosystem fit | GradeS Value100 | — |
| 3D Rendering3D rendering · creator workloads | GradeS Value100 | — |
| Light Use & EfficiencyEfficiency · lighter workloads | GradeD Value3 | Higher Value with current priorities Arc A380 S 100 capability · -97% price |
Balanced has no letter: it is a weighting preset, not a capability rubric. A grade answers “how well does this handle that job?” — price is never part of it. Relative Value puts the current market price back in.
Compare these grades with the full tier list
Browse shortlists for different uses
Trade-offs
Works well if
- 1080p Gaming is your main prioritygraded S for 1080p Gaming on the same rubric as the tier list
- You want memory headroom — memory is not what limits it hereno memory cap applies to this grade — the raster index sets it, not the frame buffer
- DLSS 4.5 + 5 with multi-frame generation matters to yousecond-generation transformer upscaler + dynamic multi-frame generation; DLSS 5 in supporting games — derived from the blackwell architecture, not from a scraped feature flag
Consider other options if
- You want strong value with Balanced priorities specificallyat today's market no realistic price for this model reaches strong value with Balanced priorities — the calculation only gets there near $2403, against a cheapest tracked $5400
- Light Use & Efficiency is what you actually need it forit grades only D there
Works well if
- 1080p is your main priority — S here means 144 Hz+ ultra with headroomgraded S for 1080p on the same rubric as the tier list
- You want memory headroom — 32 GB is above what this job needsthe same card with 8 GB grades A for 1080p; this one has 32 GB and hits no memory cap
- DLSS 4.5 + 5 with multi-frame generation matters to yousecond-generation transformer upscaler + dynamic multi-frame generation; DLSS 5 in supporting games — derived from the blackwell architecture, not from a scraped feature flag
Consider other options if
- You want strong value for 1080p specificallyat today's market no realistic price for this model reaches strong value for 1080p — the calculation only gets there near $1421, against a cheapest tracked $5400
- Light Use & Efficiency is what you actually need it forit grades only D there
Works well if
- 1440p is your main prioritygraded S for 1440p on the same rubric as the tier list
- You want memory headroom — 32 GB is above what this job needsthe same card with 12 GB grades A for 1440p; this one has 32 GB and hits no memory cap
- DLSS 4.5 + 5 with multi-frame generation matters to yousecond-generation transformer upscaler + dynamic multi-frame generation; DLSS 5 in supporting games — derived from the blackwell architecture, not from a scraped feature flag
Consider other options if
- You want strong value for 1440p specificallyat today's market no realistic price for this model reaches strong value for 1440p — the calculation only gets there near $3157, against a cheapest tracked $5400
- Light Use & Efficiency is what you actually need it forit grades only D there
Works well if
- 4K is your main prioritygraded S for 4K on the same rubric as the tier list
- Today's price already clears the strong-value markcheapest tracked $5400 against a $8866 threshold for 4K
- You want memory headroom — 32 GB is above what this job needsthe same card with 12 GB grades B for 4K; this one has 32 GB and hits no memory cap
Consider other options if
- Light Use & Efficiency is what you actually need it forit grades only D there
Works well if
- Ray Tracing @ 1080p is your main priority — S here means high-refresh ray tracing with headroomgraded S for Ray Tracing @ 1080p on the same rubric as the tier list, from 126 fps measured natively (upscaling typically adds 40–60% on top)
- You want memory headroom — memory is not what limits it hereno memory cap applies to this grade for Ray Tracing @ 1080p — the raster index sets it, not the frame buffer
- DLSS 4.5 + 5 with multi-frame generation matters to yousecond-generation transformer upscaler + dynamic multi-frame generation; DLSS 5 in supporting games — derived from the blackwell architecture, not from a scraped feature flag
Consider other options if
- You want strong value for Ray Tracing @ 1080p specificallyat today's market no realistic price for this model reaches strong value for Ray Tracing @ 1080p — the calculation only gets there near $3126, against a cheapest tracked $5400
- Light Use & Efficiency is what you actually need it forit grades only D there
Works well if
- Ray Tracing @ 1440p is your main priority — S here means high-refresh ray tracing with headroomgraded S for Ray Tracing @ 1440p on the same rubric as the tier list, from 101 fps measured natively (upscaling typically adds 40–60% on top)
- Strong-value threshold: ~$3748$3748 is where Relative Value reaches 80 for Ray Tracing @ 1440p, in the 2026-10-10–2026-10-17 offer frame
- You want memory headroom — memory is not what limits it hereno memory cap applies to this grade for Ray Tracing @ 1440p — the raster index sets it, not the frame buffer
Consider other options if
- Current price sits $1652 above the strong-value threshold (~$3748)cheapest tracked $5400 against a $3748 calculated threshold for Ray Tracing @ 1440p
- Light Use & Efficiency is what you actually need it forit grades only D there
Works well if
- Ray Tracing @ 4K is your main priority — A here means high-refresh ray tracing with headroomgraded A for Ray Tracing @ 4K on the same rubric as the tier list, from 64 fps measured natively (upscaling typically adds 40–60% on top)
- Today's price already clears the strong-value markcheapest tracked $5400 against a $9433 threshold for Ray Tracing @ 4K
- You want memory headroom — memory is not what limits it hereno memory cap applies to this grade for Ray Tracing @ 4K — the raster index sets it, not the frame buffer
Consider other options if
- Light Use & Efficiency is what you actually need it forit grades only D there
Works well if
- AI is your main prioritygraded S for AI on the same rubric as the tier list
- Today's price already clears the strong-value markcheapest tracked $5400 against a $9433 threshold for AI
- You want memory headroom — 32 GB is above what this job needsthe same card with 16 GB grades A for AI; this one has 32 GB and hits no memory cap
Consider other options if
- Light Use & Efficiency is what you actually need it forit grades only D there
Works well if
- 3D Rendering is your main prioritygraded S for 3D Rendering on the same rubric as the tier list
- Today's price already clears the strong-value markcheapest tracked $5400 against a $7833 threshold for 3D Rendering
- You want memory headroom — 32 GB is above what this job needsthe same card with 10 GB grades A for 3D Rendering; this one has 32 GB and hits no memory cap
Consider other options if
- Light Use & Efficiency is what you actually need it forit grades only D there
For the selected scenario this is not a strong fit — the grade above is the reason, and the models below suit it better.
Works well if
- Light Use is not actually your main job — 1080p Gaming isit grades D for Light Use, but S for 1080p Gaming
Consider other options if
- Light Use is what you actually need it forit grades D there; RX 9070 XT grades D at $800
- You want strong value for Light Use specificallycompeting products deliver so much more for Light Use per dollar that no price this model realistically trades at reaches the strong-value mark for this job
- Value for money matters more to you than this exact modelArc A380 holds Relative Value 100 against its 3 for Light Use, at $160
Every line states the fact it was derived from, for the scenario selected above. Thresholds are calculated points on our value curve — information about where the maths turns, not instructions about what to pay.
Similar options to the RTX 5090
Chosen for Light Use
More head-to-head comparisons in this category
Upgrade planner
Judge the change in the active scenario, then make the cash gap explicit.
Using page scenarioWhat are you upgrading from? These are the axes we compare on, and where this product stands in the current market.
We rank upgrades by out-of-pocket cost — the new price minus what yours is worth — not by sticker price.
Only candidates that clear the configured meaningful-upgrade gate will be shown; roles are omitted rather than filled.
Capability differences are expressed as tiers and index points, not as benchmark percentages we did not measure.
Specifications and compatibility
What this product is, and what to check before it goes into your build.
Core / Performance
- Architecture
- Blackwell 2.0
- GPU chip
- GB202
- GPU variant
- GB202-300-A1
- Process node
- 5 nm
- Transistors
- 92,200 million
- Shading units
- 21760
Memory
- Capacity
- 32 GB
- Type
- GDDR7
- Bus width
- 512 bit
- Effective speed
- 28 Gbps
- Bandwidth
- 1792 GB/s
Power / Interface
- Board power (TBP)
- 575 W
- Power connector
- Varies by version
- Recommended PSU
- Varies by version
- Bus interface
- PCIe 5.0 x16
Physical / Outputs
- Length
- Varies by version189–359 mm across tracked variants
- Height
- Varies by version140–302 mm across tracked variants
- Width
- Varies by version
- Slot thickness
- Varies by version2–4 across tracked variants
- Fans
- Varies by version3 across tracked variants
- Cooling
- Varies by version
- Outputs
- Varies by version
Power / Interface
- Board power (TBP)
- 575 W
- Power connector
- 1x 16-pin
- Recommended PSU
- 950 W
- Bus interface
- PCIe 5.0 x16
Physical / Outputs
- Length
- 348 mm
- Height
- 146 mm
- Width
- Unknown
- Slot thickness
- 4 slots
- Fans
- 3
- Cooling
- Air
- Outputs
- 3× DisplayPort · 2× HDMI
Exact board / Identity
- Board part number
- TUF-RTX5090-32G-GAMING
- Vendor warranty
- 3 years
Power / Interface
- Board power (TBP)
- 575 W
- Power connector
- 1x 16-pin
- Recommended PSU
- 950 W
- Bus interface
- PCIe 5.0 x16
Physical / Outputs
- Length
- 348 mm
- Height
- 146 mm
- Width
- Unknown
- Slot thickness
- 4 slots
- Fans
- 3
- Cooling
- Air
- Outputs
- 3× DisplayPort · 2× HDMI
Exact board / Identity
- Board part number
- TUF-RTX5090-O32G-GAMING
- Vendor warranty
- 3 years
Power / Interface
- Board power (TBP)
- 575 W
- Power connector
- 1x 16-pin
- Recommended PSU
- 950 W
- Bus interface
- PCIe 5.0 x16
Physical / Outputs
- Length
- 189 mm
- Height
- 302 mm
- Width
- Unknown
- Slot thickness
- 2 slots
- Fans
- 3
- Cooling
- Air
- Outputs
- 3× DisplayPort · 1× HDMI · 1× USB-C
Exact board / Identity
- Board part number
- GV-N5090IXEB-32GD
- Vendor warranty
- 3 years
Power / Interface
- Board power (TBP)
- 575 W
- Power connector
- 1x 16-pin
- Recommended PSU
- 950 W
- Bus interface
- PCIe 5.0 x16
Physical / Outputs
- Length
- 340 mm
- Height
- 140 mm
- Width
- Unknown
- Slot thickness
- 3 slots
- Fans
- 3
- Cooling
- Air
- Outputs
- 3× DisplayPort · 1× HDMI
Exact board / Identity
- Board part number
- GV-N5090GAMING OC-32GD
- Vendor warranty
- 3 years
Power / Interface
- Board power (TBP)
- 575 W
- Power connector
- 1x 16-pin
- Recommended PSU
- 950 W
- Bus interface
- PCIe 5.0 x16
Physical / Outputs
- Length
- 342 mm
- Height
- 150 mm
- Width
- Unknown
- Slot thickness
- 3 slots
- Fans
- 3
- Cooling
- Air
- Outputs
- 3× DisplayPort · 1× HDMI
Exact board / Identity
- Board part number
- GV-N5090WF3-32GD
- Vendor warranty
- 3 years
Power / Interface
- Board power (TBP)
- 575 W
- Power connector
- 1x 16-pin
- Recommended PSU
- 950 W
- Bus interface
- PCIe 5.0 x16
Physical / Outputs
- Length
- 342 mm
- Height
- 150 mm
- Width
- Unknown
- Slot thickness
- 3 slots
- Fans
- 3
- Cooling
- Air
- Outputs
- 3× DisplayPort · 1× HDMI
Exact board / Identity
- Board part number
- GV-N5090WF3OC-32GD
- Vendor warranty
- 3 years
Power / Interface
- Board power (TBP)
- 575 W
- Power connector
- 1x 16-pin
- Recommended PSU
- 950 W
- Bus interface
- PCIe 5.0 x16
Physical / Outputs
- Length
- 359 mm
- Height
- 149 mm
- Width
- Unknown
- Slot thickness
- 3 slots
- Fans
- 3
- Cooling
- Air
- Outputs
- 3× DisplayPort · 1× HDMI
Exact board / Identity
- Board part number
- G5090-32GTC
- Vendor warranty
- 3 years
Select an exact version for physical dimensions and connector details.
Show all specifications
Core / Performance
- Texture units
- 680
- ROPs
- 176
- Ray tracing cores
- 170
- Tensor cores
- 680
- Base clock
- 2017 MHz
- Boost clock
- 2407 MHz
Features
- Upscaling
- DLSS 4.5 + 5
- Frame generation
- multi-frame generation
- Ray tracing
- Supported
- RGB lighting
- No
Warranty & release
- Release year
- 2025
Hover any value to see where it came from: a manufacturer specification, or a figure The Comparator calculated.
Sources: Comparator offer frame 2026-10-10–2026-10-17
What to check in your build
Varies by version
The exact requirement depends on the version you select.
Varies by version
Select a board to confirm its connector and cable-clearance needs.
Varies by version
The exact requirement depends on the version you select.
Varies by version
The exact requirement depends on the version you select.
Varies by version
Slot occupancy depends on the board cooler and thickness.
Select an exact version above for physical dimensions and connector details.
950 W PSU recommended
Whole-system figure from the board vendor — it already allows for the processor and transient spikes.
1x 16-pin required
Adapters work but add connector bulk and need extra cable-bend clearance.
Needs at least 348 mm of GPU clearance
Front radiators and fans eat into the figure a case advertises.
Leave room beyond the card for the cable bend
No verified minimum is published — measure it.
Occupies 4 slots
The cooler covers the slots below it — check nothing adjacent needs that space.
950 W PSU recommended
Whole-system figure from the board vendor — it already allows for the processor and transient spikes.
1x 16-pin required
Adapters work but add connector bulk and need extra cable-bend clearance.
Needs at least 348 mm of GPU clearance
Front radiators and fans eat into the figure a case advertises.
Leave room beyond the card for the cable bend
No verified minimum is published — measure it.
Occupies 4 slots
The cooler covers the slots below it — check nothing adjacent needs that space.
950 W PSU recommended
Whole-system figure from the board vendor — it already allows for the processor and transient spikes.
1x 16-pin required
Adapters work but add connector bulk and need extra cable-bend clearance.
Needs at least 189 mm of GPU clearance
Front radiators and fans eat into the figure a case advertises.
Leave room beyond the card for the cable bend
No verified minimum is published — measure it.
Occupies 2 slots
The cooler covers the slots below it — check nothing adjacent needs that space.
950 W PSU recommended
Whole-system figure from the board vendor — it already allows for the processor and transient spikes.
1x 16-pin required
Adapters work but add connector bulk and need extra cable-bend clearance.
Needs at least 340 mm of GPU clearance
Front radiators and fans eat into the figure a case advertises.
Leave room beyond the card for the cable bend
No verified minimum is published — measure it.
Occupies 3 slots
The cooler covers the slots below it — check nothing adjacent needs that space.
950 W PSU recommended
Whole-system figure from the board vendor — it already allows for the processor and transient spikes.
1x 16-pin required
Adapters work but add connector bulk and need extra cable-bend clearance.
Needs at least 342 mm of GPU clearance
Front radiators and fans eat into the figure a case advertises.
Leave room beyond the card for the cable bend
No verified minimum is published — measure it.
Occupies 3 slots
The cooler covers the slots below it — check nothing adjacent needs that space.
950 W PSU recommended
Whole-system figure from the board vendor — it already allows for the processor and transient spikes.
1x 16-pin required
Adapters work but add connector bulk and need extra cable-bend clearance.
Needs at least 342 mm of GPU clearance
Front radiators and fans eat into the figure a case advertises.
Leave room beyond the card for the cable bend
No verified minimum is published — measure it.
Occupies 3 slots
The cooler covers the slots below it — check nothing adjacent needs that space.
950 W PSU recommended
Whole-system figure from the board vendor — it already allows for the processor and transient spikes.
1x 16-pin required
Adapters work but add connector bulk and need extra cable-bend clearance.
Needs at least 359 mm of GPU clearance
Front radiators and fans eat into the figure a case advertises.
Leave room beyond the card for the cable bend
No verified minimum is published — measure it.
Occupies 3 slots
The cooler covers the slots below it — check nothing adjacent needs that space.
Compare all 7 board variants
| Variant | Length | Slot thickness | Power connector | Recommended PSU |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ASUS TUF Gaming RTX 5090 | 348 mm | 4 | 1x 16-pin | 950 W |
| ASUS TUF Gaming RTX 5090 OC Edition | 348 mm | 4 | 1x 16-pin | 950 W |
| GIGABYTE AORUS RTX 5090 AI BOX | 189 mm | 2 | 1x 16-pin | 950 W |
| GIGABYTE RTX 5090 GAMING OC | 340 mm | 3 | 1x 16-pin | 950 W |
| GIGABYTE RTX 5090 WINDFORCE | 342 mm | 3 | 1x 16-pin | 950 W |
| GIGABYTE RTX 5090 WINDFORCE OC | 342 mm | 3 | 1x 16-pin | 950 W |
| MSI RTX 5090 GAMING TRIO OC | 359 mm | 3 | 1x 16-pin | 950 W |
Found an error? Report this specification Email the field, corrected value and an optional source.
Compatibility guidance is practical help, not a score. Missing data is shown as unknown, never invented.
Summary
RTX 5090 offers a balanced view across an all-round mix of priorities. It ranks #1 by capability in the current modelled field. Its clearest measured strength is raster index 2383. The main limitation appears when Light Use & Efficiency becomes the priority, where it grades D.
RTX 5090 offers S-grade capability for 1080p. It ranks #1 by capability in the current modelled field. Its clearest measured strength is raster index 2383. The main limitation appears when Light Use & Efficiency becomes the priority, where it grades D.
RTX 5090 offers S-grade capability for 1440p. It ranks #1 by capability in the current modelled field. Its clearest measured strength is raster index 2383. The main limitation appears when Light Use & Efficiency becomes the priority, where it grades D.
RTX 5090 offers S-grade capability for 4K. It ranks #1 by capability in the current modelled field. Its clearest measured strength is raster index 2383. The main limitation appears when Light Use & Efficiency becomes the priority, where it grades D.
RTX 5090 offers S-grade capability for Ray Tracing @ 1080p. It ranks #1 by capability in the current modelled field. Its clearest measured strength is ray-tracing index 2621. The main limitation appears when Light Use & Efficiency becomes the priority, where it grades D.
RTX 5090 offers S-grade capability for Ray Tracing @ 1440p. It ranks #1 by capability in the current modelled field. Its clearest measured strength is ray-tracing index 2621. The main limitation appears when Light Use & Efficiency becomes the priority, where it grades D.
RTX 5090 offers A-grade capability for Ray Tracing @ 4K. It ranks #1 by capability in the current modelled field. Its clearest measured strength is ray-tracing index 2621. The main limitation appears when Light Use & Efficiency becomes the priority, where it grades D.
RTX 5090 offers S-grade capability for AI. It ranks #1 by capability in the current modelled field. Its clearest measured strength is ai compute index 3593. The main limitation appears when Light Use & Efficiency becomes the priority, where it grades D.
RTX 5090 offers S-grade capability for 3D Rendering. It ranks #1 by capability in the current modelled field. Its clearest measured strength is raster index 2383. The main limitation appears when Light Use & Efficiency becomes the priority, where it grades D.
RTX 5090 offers D-grade capability for Light Use. Its clearest measured strength is raster index 2383. The D grade is the decisive limitation for this workload.
FAQ
Do all RTX 5090 boards have the same physical design?
No. Dimensions, slot thickness, cooling, power connectors and display outputs belong to the exact board. Use the Exact version selector before checking case or PSU fit.
How much case clearance should I allow for the RTX 5090?
Tracked boards range from 189 to 359 mm in length. Select the exact board, then also allow for front radiators or fans, card height, slot thickness and power-cable bend; length alone does not guarantee fit.
Why does Relative Value change when I choose another scenario?
Each scenario changes the weights applied to capability, price and the other published factors. The hardware facts stay fixed, but the value question changes, so its score and rank can change too.
Why can Amazon appear without a tracked price?
Amazon is shown as a discovery link when we do not have a permitted verified price snapshot. It is excluded from price comparisons, rankings and Relative Value until a compliant tracked price exists.
Useful links & sources
offer frame 2026-10-10–2026-10-17 · formula gpu-value-v1.4 · facts facts-2026-10-17 · Relative Value is an estimate from our current dataset, the selected weights and dated market prices — not an official product rating and not a price forecast. Target prices are calculation thresholds, not predictions. Methodology We are not a shop. Affiliate links may earn us a commission; they never change the calculations or the ranking.