Retailer photo of GIGABYTE RTX 5070 Ti WINDFORCE OC SFF. View this offer in Where to buy
NVIDIA · GPU · RTX 50
RTX 5070 Ti
The current RTX 5070 Ti price from retailers, its key specifications, and how it performs for each job.
Works well for: 1080p Gaming, 1440p Gaming, Ray Tracing @ 1080p
Trade-offs: Current price sits $83 above the strong-value threshold (~$1087)
- VRAM
- 16 GB
- Memory bandwidth
- 896 GB/s
- Board power
- 300 W
- Architecture
- Blackwell 2.0
- Interface
- PCIe 5.0 x16
Move a slider and the page re-scores this product against the same market frame.
What does it cost today, and is that a good price?
Market confidence: HighAt $1170 the RTX 5070 Ti is priced 10% below its $1300 representative market level. RX 9070 XT currently does the same job for $800.
Worth putting side by side:Compare with RX 9070 XT
Prices & availability
RTX 5070 Ti: current price and offers
Compare the offers we track for this model, across variants and retailers.
31 tracked offers · 3 retailers
Dated price snapshots: $1,170–$1,981
Prices are dated snapshots, not live quotes — confirm the final price at the store. New, refurbished and used offers are listed separately; used offers carry warranty and seller risk.
Performance and where it ranks
Two different questions, side by side. Performance compares what the hardware can do; Value compares what that capability costs at today’s price. A product can rank high on one and low on the other — that gap is the point.
Performance Balanced
How much it can do. Price plays no part in this ranking.
#10 of 51 graded graphics cards
- #7 NVIDIARTX 4080 61
- #8 AMDRX 9070 XT 60
- #9 AMDRadeon AI Pro R9700 60
- #10 NVIDIARTX 5070 Ti 59
- #11 AMDRX 7900 XT 57
- #12 NVIDIARTX 4070 Ti Super 57
- #13 NVIDIARTX 3090 Ti 54
Value Balanced
How much of that you get for today’s price.
#12 of 52 currently priced graphics cards
- #9 NVIDIARTX 5070 81
- #10 NVIDIARTX 5060 Ti 8GB 80
- #11 IntelArc A580 77
- #12 NVIDIARTX 5070 Ti 76
- #13 NVIDIARTX 5060 76
- #14 AMDRX 7900 XT 74
- #15 AMDRX 7800 XT 73
Performance 1080p
How much it can do. Price plays no part in this ranking.
#10 of 51 graded graphics cards
- #7 NVIDIARTX 4080 61
- #8 AMDRX 9070 XT 60
- #9 AMDRadeon AI Pro R9700 60
- #10 NVIDIARTX 5070 Ti 59
- #11 AMDRX 7900 XT 57
- #12 NVIDIARTX 4070 Ti Super 57
- #13 NVIDIARTX 3090 Ti 54
Value 1080p
How much of that you get for today’s price.
#18 of 52 currently priced graphics cards
- #15 AMDRX 7800 XT 61
- #16 AMDRX 7700 XT 59
- #17 NVIDIARTX 4070 58
- #18 NVIDIARTX 5070 Ti 57
- #19 AMDRX 7900 XT 57
- #20 NVIDIARTX 3050 6GB 56
- #21 NVIDIARTX 4060 Ti 8GB 56
Performance 1440p
How much it can do. Price plays no part in this ranking.
#10 of 51 graded graphics cards
- #7 NVIDIARTX 4080 61
- #8 AMDRX 9070 XT 60
- #9 AMDRadeon AI Pro R9700 60
- #10 NVIDIARTX 5070 Ti 59
- #11 AMDRX 7900 XT 57
- #12 NVIDIARTX 4070 Ti Super 57
- #13 NVIDIARTX 3090 Ti 54
Value 1440p
How much of that you get for today’s price.
#5 of 52 currently priced graphics cards
- #2 AMDRX 9070 91
- #3 AMDRX 9060 XT 16GB 84
- #4 AMDRX 9070 GRE 80
- #5 NVIDIARTX 5070 Ti 74
- #6 NVIDIARTX 5070 74
- #7 NVIDIARTX 5080 73
- #8 IntelArc B580 69
Performance 4K
How much it can do. Price plays no part in this ranking.
#10 of 51 graded graphics cards
- #7 NVIDIARTX 4080 61
- #8 AMDRX 9070 XT 60
- #9 AMDRadeon AI Pro R9700 60
- #10 NVIDIARTX 5070 Ti 59
- #11 AMDRX 7900 XT 57
- #12 NVIDIARTX 4070 Ti Super 57
- #13 NVIDIARTX 3090 Ti 54
Value 4K
How much of that you get for today’s price.
#5 of 52 currently priced graphics cards
- #2 AMDRX 9070 XT 84
- #3 NVIDIARTX 5080 78
- #4 AMDRX 9070 70
- #5 NVIDIARTX 5070 Ti 70
- #6 AMDRX 7900 XTX 68
- #7 NVIDIARTX 4080 Super 62
- #8 AMDRX 7900 XT 61
Performance Ray Tracing @ 1080p
How much it can do. Price plays no part in this ranking.
#6 of 41 graded graphics cards
- #3 NVIDIARTX 5080 78
- #4 NVIDIARTX 4080 Super 75
- #5 NVIDIARTX 4080 74
- #6 NVIDIARTX 5070 Ti 72
- #7 NVIDIARTX 4070 Ti Super 70
- #8 NVIDIARTX 4070 Ti 62
- #9 AMDRX 9070 XT 62
Value Ray Tracing @ 1080p
How much of that you get for today’s price.
#6 of 52 currently priced graphics cards
- #3 NVIDIARTX 5070 79
- #4 AMDRX 9070 GRE 78
- #5 NVIDIARTX 5080 77
- #6 NVIDIARTX 5070 Ti 77
- #7 IntelArc B580 74
- #8 AMDRX 9060 XT 16GB 73
- #9 NVIDIARTX 5060 Ti 8GB 69
Performance Ray Tracing @ 1440p
How much it can do. Price plays no part in this ranking.
#6 of 43 graded graphics cards
- #3 NVIDIARTX 5080 73
- #4 NVIDIARTX 4080 Super 69
- #5 NVIDIARTX 4080 68
- #6 NVIDIARTX 5070 Ti 66
- #7 NVIDIARTX 4070 Ti Super 60
- #8 AMDRX 9070 XT 55
- #9 NVIDIARTX 4070 Ti 55
Value Ray Tracing @ 1440p
How much of that you get for today’s price.
#4 of 52 currently priced graphics cards
- #1 AMDRX 9070 XT 100
- #2 AMDRX 9070 89
- #3 NVIDIARTX 5080 78
- #4 NVIDIARTX 5070 Ti 77
- #5 NVIDIARTX 5070 75
- #6 AMDRX 9070 GRE 73
- #7 AMDRX 9060 XT 16GB 69
Performance Ray Tracing @ 4K
How much it can do. Price plays no part in this ranking.
#6 of 43 graded graphics cards
- #3 NVIDIARTX 5080 66
- #4 NVIDIARTX 4080 Super 60
- #5 NVIDIARTX 4080 58
- #6 NVIDIARTX 5070 Ti 57
- #7 NVIDIARTX 4070 Ti Super 50
- #8 AMDRX 9070 XT 47
- #9 NVIDIARTX 3090 Ti 46
Value Ray Tracing @ 4K
How much of that you get for today’s price.
#4 of 52 currently priced graphics cards
- #1 NVIDIARTX 5090 100
- #2 AMDRX 9070 XT 77
- #3 NVIDIARTX 5080 74
- #4 NVIDIARTX 5070 Ti 66
- #5 AMDRX 9070 66
- #6 NVIDIARTX 4080 Super 60
- #7 NVIDIARTX 4090 58
Performance AI
How much it can do. Price plays no part in this ranking.
#7 of 51 graded graphics cards
- #4 NVIDIARTX 4080 Super 50
- #5 NVIDIARTX 4080 48
- #6 NVIDIARTX 4070 Ti Super 42
- #7 NVIDIARTX 5070 Ti 42
- #8 NVIDIARTX PRO 4000 Blackwell 38
- #9 NVIDIARTX 4070 Ti 38
- #10 NVIDIARTX 3090 Ti 38
Value AI
How much of that you get for today’s price.
#4 of 52 currently priced graphics cards
- #1 NVIDIARTX 5090 100
- #2 NVIDIARTX 4090 55
- #3 NVIDIARTX 5080 47
- #4 NVIDIARTX 5070 Ti 42
- #5 NVIDIARTX 4080 Super 41
- #6 NVIDIARTX PRO 4000 Blackwell 39
- #7 NVIDIARTX 4070 Ti Super 38
Performance 3D Rendering
How much it can do. Price plays no part in this ranking.
#6 of 39 graded graphics cards
- #3 NVIDIARTX 5080 61
- #4 NVIDIARTX 4080 56
- #5 NVIDIARTX 4080 Super 55
- #6 NVIDIARTX 5070 Ti 51
- #7 NVIDIARTX 4070 Ti 49
- #8 NVIDIARTX 4070 Ti Super 46
- #9 NVIDIARTX 3090 Ti 43
Value 3D Rendering
How much of that you get for today’s price.
#4 of 52 currently priced graphics cards
- #1 NVIDIARTX 5090 100
- #2 NVIDIARTX 5080 68
- #3 NVIDIARTX 4090 59
- #4 NVIDIARTX 5070 Ti 59
- #5 NVIDIARTX 4080 Super 56
- #6 NVIDIARTX 4070 Ti Super 52
- #7 NVIDIARTX 4080 48
Performance Light Use
How much it can do. Price plays no part in this ranking.
#39 of 50 graded graphics cards
- #36 NVIDIARTX 4070 Ti Super 48
- #37 NVIDIARTX 4070 Ti 48
- #38 NVIDIARTX 3070 Ti 46
- #39 NVIDIARTX 5070 Ti 44
- #40 AMDRX 7900 XT 44
- #41 AMDRadeon AI Pro R9700 44
- #42 AMDRX 9070 XT 43
Value Light Use
How much of that you get for today’s price.
#34 of 52 currently priced graphics cards
- #31 IntelIntel Arc Pro B70 19
- #32 AMDRX 7800 XT 19
- #33 IntelArc A770 18
- #34 NVIDIARTX 5070 Ti 16
- #35 NVIDIARTX 3060 Ti 16
- #36 NVIDIARTX PRO 4000 Blackwell 15
- #37 NVIDIARTX 4070 Ti Super 14
These ladders follow the preset scenario shown above. Your own weights re-score this product, not the whole field.
What it is good for
| Scenario | this productCapability grade · Value at current price | Higher capability | Higher Value with current priorities |
|---|---|---|---|
| Balanced (all-round)Weighted all-round view | GradeNo grade Value76 | — | Higher Value with current priorities RX 9070 XT 100 +1% capability · -32% price |
| 1080p GamingRaster performance · 1080p | GradeS Value57 | — | Higher Value with current priorities RX 9070 XT S 84 +1% capability · -32% price |
| 1440p GamingRaster performance · 1440p | GradeS Value74 | — | Higher Value with current priorities RX 9070 XT S 100 +1% capability · -32% price |
| 4K / VRRaster performance · 4K / VR | GradeA Value70 | — | Higher Value with current priorities RX 9070 XT A 84 +1% capability · -32% price |
| Ray Tracing @ 1080pRay tracing capability · 1080p | GradeS Value77 | — | — |
| Ray Tracing @ 1440pRay tracing capability · 1440p | GradeA Value77 | — | — |
| Ray Tracing @ 4KRay tracing capability · 4K | GradeC Value66 | — | — |
| AI / Local LLMAI compute · memory and ecosystem fit | GradeA Value42 | — | — |
| 3D Rendering3D rendering · creator workloads | GradeA Value59 | — | — |
| Light Use & EfficiencyEfficiency · lighter workloads | GradeC Value16 | Higher capability RTX 3050 6GB S 97 +128% capability · -74% price | Higher Value with current priorities Arc A380 S 100 +125% capability · -86% price |
Balanced has no letter: it is a weighting preset, not a capability rubric. A grade answers “how well does this handle that job?” — price is never part of it. Relative Value puts the current market price back in.
Compare these grades with the full tier list
Browse shortlists for different uses
Trade-offs
Works well if
- 1080p Gaming is your main prioritygraded S for 1080p Gaming on the same rubric as the tier list
- Strong-value threshold: ~$1087$1087 is where Relative Value reaches 80 with Balanced priorities, in the 2026-10-10–2026-10-17 offer frame
- You want memory headroom — memory is not what limits it hereno memory cap applies to this grade — the raster index sets it, not the frame buffer
Consider other options if
- Current price sits $83 above the strong-value threshold (~$1087)cheapest tracked $1170 against a $1087 calculated threshold with Balanced priorities
- Value for money matters more to you than this exact modelRX 9070 XT holds Relative Value 100 against its 76 with Balanced priorities, at $800
- Light Use & Efficiency is what you actually need it forit grades only C there
Works well if
- 1080p is your main priority — S here means 144 Hz+ ultra with headroomgraded S for 1080p on the same rubric as the tier list
- Strong-value threshold: ~$832$832 is where Relative Value reaches 80 for 1080p, in the 2026-10-10–2026-10-17 offer frame
- You want memory headroom — 16 GB is above what this job needsthe same card with 8 GB grades A for 1080p; this one has 16 GB and hits no memory cap
Consider other options if
- Current price sits $338 above the strong-value threshold (~$832)cheapest tracked $1170 against a $832 calculated threshold for 1080p
- Value for money matters more to you than this exact modelRX 9070 XT holds Relative Value 84 against its 57 for 1080p, at $800
- Light Use & Efficiency is what you actually need it forit grades only C there
Works well if
- 1440p is your main prioritygraded S for 1440p on the same rubric as the tier list
- Strong-value threshold: ~$1061$1061 is where Relative Value reaches 80 for 1440p, in the 2026-10-10–2026-10-17 offer frame
- You want memory headroom — 16 GB is above what this job needsthe same card with 12 GB grades A for 1440p; this one has 16 GB and hits no memory cap
Consider other options if
- Current price sits $109 above the strong-value threshold (~$1061)cheapest tracked $1170 against a $1061 calculated threshold for 1440p
- Value for money matters more to you than this exact modelRX 9070 XT holds Relative Value 100 against its 74 for 1440p, at $800
- Light Use & Efficiency is what you actually need it forit grades only C there
Works well if
- 4K is your main prioritygraded A for 4K on the same rubric as the tier list
- Strong-value threshold: ~$867$867 is where Relative Value reaches 80 for 4K, in the 2026-10-10–2026-10-17 offer frame
- You want memory headroom — 16 GB is above what this job needsthe same card with 12 GB grades B for 4K; this one has 16 GB and hits no memory cap
Consider other options if
- Current price sits $303 above the strong-value threshold (~$867)cheapest tracked $1170 against a $867 calculated threshold for 4K
- Value for money matters more to you than this exact modelRX 9070 XT holds Relative Value 84 against its 70 for 4K, at $800
- Light Use & Efficiency is what you actually need it forit grades only C there
Works well if
- Ray Tracing @ 1080p is your main priority — S here means comfortable ray tracinggraded S for Ray Tracing @ 1080p on the same rubric as the tier list, from 90 fps measured natively (upscaling typically adds 40–60% on top)
- Strong-value threshold: ~$1102$1102 is where Relative Value reaches 80 for Ray Tracing @ 1080p, in the 2026-10-10–2026-10-17 offer frame
- You want memory headroom — memory is not what limits it hereno memory cap applies to this grade for Ray Tracing @ 1080p — the raster index sets it, not the frame buffer
Consider other options if
- Current price sits $68 above the strong-value threshold (~$1102)cheapest tracked $1170 against a $1102 calculated threshold for Ray Tracing @ 1080p
- Light Use & Efficiency is what you actually need it forit grades only C there
Works well if
- Ray Tracing @ 1440p is your main priority — A here means comfortable ray tracinggraded A for Ray Tracing @ 1440p on the same rubric as the tier list, from 66 fps measured natively (upscaling typically adds 40–60% on top)
- Strong-value threshold: ~$1100$1100 is where Relative Value reaches 80 for Ray Tracing @ 1440p, in the 2026-10-10–2026-10-17 offer frame
- You want memory headroom — memory is not what limits it hereno memory cap applies to this grade for Ray Tracing @ 1440p — the raster index sets it, not the frame buffer
Consider other options if
- Current price sits $70 above the strong-value threshold (~$1100)cheapest tracked $1170 against a $1100 calculated threshold for Ray Tracing @ 1440p
- Light Use & Efficiency is what you actually need it forit grades only C there
For the selected scenario this is not a strong fit — the grade above is the reason, and the models below suit it better.
Works well if
- Ray Tracing @ 4K is not actually your main job — 1080p Gaming isit grades C for Ray Tracing @ 4K, but S for 1080p Gaming
Consider other options if
- Ray Tracing @ 4K is what you actually need it forit grades only C there
- You want strong value for Ray Tracing @ 4K specificallyat today's market no realistic price for this model reaches strong value for Ray Tracing @ 4K — the calculation only gets there near $715, against a cheapest tracked $1170
Works well if
- AI is your main prioritygraded A for AI on the same rubric as the tier list
- You want memory headroom — 16 GB is above what this job needsthe same card with 12 GB grades B for AI; this one has 16 GB and hits no memory cap
- DLSS 4.5 + 5 with multi-frame generation matters to yousecond-generation transformer upscaler + dynamic multi-frame generation; DLSS 5 in supporting games — derived from the blackwell architecture, not from a scraped feature flag
Consider other options if
- You want strong value for AI specificallycompeting products deliver so much more for AI per dollar that no price this model realistically trades at reaches the strong-value mark for this job
- Light Use & Efficiency is what you actually need it forit grades only C there
Works well if
- 3D Rendering is your main prioritygraded A for 3D Rendering on the same rubric as the tier list
- You want memory headroom — 16 GB is above what this job needsthe same card with 6 GB grades C for 3D Rendering; this one has 16 GB and hits no memory cap
- DLSS 4.5 + 5 with multi-frame generation matters to yousecond-generation transformer upscaler + dynamic multi-frame generation; DLSS 5 in supporting games — derived from the blackwell architecture, not from a scraped feature flag
Consider other options if
- You want strong value for 3D Rendering specificallyat today's market no realistic price for this model reaches strong value for 3D Rendering — the calculation only gets there near $696, against a cheapest tracked $1170
- Light Use & Efficiency is what you actually need it forit grades only C there
For the selected scenario this is not a strong fit — the grade above is the reason, and the models below suit it better.
Works well if
- Light Use is not actually your main job — 1080p Gaming isit grades C for Light Use, but S for 1080p Gaming
Consider other options if
- Light Use is what you actually need it forit grades C there; RTX 3050 6GB grades S at $307
- You want strong value for Light Use specificallycompeting products deliver so much more for Light Use per dollar that no price this model realistically trades at reaches the strong-value mark for this job
- Value for money matters more to you than this exact modelArc A380 holds Relative Value 100 against its 16 for Light Use, at $160
Every line states the fact it was derived from, for the scenario selected above. Thresholds are calculated points on our value curve — information about where the maths turns, not instructions about what to pay.
Similar options to the RTX 5070 Ti
Chosen for Balanced
Chosen for 1080p
Chosen for 1440p
Chosen for 4K
Chosen for AI
This scenario carries a requirement candidates are checked against first: CUDA — Many local-LLM and diffusion toolchains are CUDA-only. ROCm and Vulkan builds exist and work, but they are not drop-in — check your toolchain before treating a non-NVIDIA card as an equivalent swap.
Chosen for 3D Rendering
This scenario carries a requirement candidates are checked against first: OptiX — Blender Cycles reaches its fastest path on NVIDIA OptiX. HIP (AMD) and oneAPI (Intel) render the same scenes, so this is a workflow question, not a capability wall — but render times and add-on support differ.
Chosen for Light Use
Alternatives stay near this product’s price range. Step-up options may exceed the standard budget envelope when the capability gain is meaningful.
More head-to-head comparisons in this category
Upgrade planner
Judge the change in the active scenario, then make the cash gap explicit.
Using page scenarioWhat are you upgrading from? These are the axes we compare on, and where this product stands in the current market.
We rank upgrades by out-of-pocket cost — the new price minus what yours is worth — not by sticker price.
Only candidates that clear the configured meaningful-upgrade gate will be shown; roles are omitted rather than filled.
Capability differences are expressed as tiers and index points, not as benchmark percentages we did not measure.
Specifications and compatibility
What this product is, and what to check before it goes into your build.
Core / Performance
- Architecture
- Blackwell 2.0
- GPU chip
- GB203
- GPU variant
- GB203-300-A1
- Process node
- 5 nm
- Transistors
- 45,600 million
- Shading units
- 8960
Memory
- Capacity
- 16 GB
- Type
- GDDR7
- Bus width
- 256 bit
- Effective speed
- 28 Gbps
- Bandwidth
- 896 GB/s
Power / Interface
- Board power (TBP)
- 300 W
- Power connector
- Varies by version
- Recommended PSU
- Varies by version
- Bus interface
- PCIe 5.0 x16
Physical / Outputs
- Length
- Varies by version300–360 mm across tracked variants
- Height
- Varies by version116–150 mm across tracked variants
- Width
- Varies by version
- Slot thickness
- Varies by version2–4 across tracked variants
- Fans
- Varies by version3 across tracked variants
- Cooling
- Varies by version
- Outputs
- Varies by version
Power / Interface
- Board power (TBP)
- 300 W
- Power connector
- 1x 16-pin
- Recommended PSU
- 700 W
- Bus interface
- PCIe 5.0 x16
Physical / Outputs
- Length
- 306 mm
- Height
- 126 mm
- Width
- Unknown
- Slot thickness
- 2 slots
- Fans
- 3
- Cooling
- Air
- Outputs
- 3× DisplayPort · 1× HDMI
Exact board / Identity
- Board part number
- PRIME-RTX5070TI-16G
- Vendor warranty
- 3 years
Power / Interface
- Board power (TBP)
- 300 W
- Power connector
- 1x 16-pin
- Recommended PSU
- 700 W
- Bus interface
- PCIe 5.0 x16
Physical / Outputs
- Length
- 306 mm
- Height
- 126 mm
- Width
- Unknown
- Slot thickness
- 2 slots
- Fans
- 3
- Cooling
- Air
- Outputs
- 3× DisplayPort · 1× HDMI
Exact board / Identity
- Board part number
- PRIME-RTX5070TI-O16G
- Vendor warranty
- 3 years
Power / Interface
- Board power (TBP)
- 300 W
- Power connector
- 1x 16-pin
- Recommended PSU
- 700 W
- Bus interface
- PCIe 5.0 x16
Physical / Outputs
- Length
- 332 mm
- Height
- 147 mm
- Width
- Unknown
- Slot thickness
- 3 slots
- Fans
- 3
- Cooling
- Air
- Outputs
- 3× DisplayPort · 2× HDMI
Exact board / Identity
- Board part number
- ROG-STRIX-RTX5070TI-O16G
- Vendor warranty
- 3 years
Power / Interface
- Board power (TBP)
- 300 W
- Power connector
- 1x 16-pin
- Recommended PSU
- 700 W
- Bus interface
- PCIe 5.0 x16
Physical / Outputs
- Length
- 329 mm
- Height
- 140 mm
- Width
- Unknown
- Slot thickness
- 3 slots
- Fans
- 3
- Cooling
- Air
- Outputs
- 3× DisplayPort · 2× HDMI
Exact board / Identity
- Board part number
- TUF-RTX5070TI-O16G-GAMING
- Vendor warranty
- 3 years
Power / Interface
- Board power (TBP)
- 300 W
- Power connector
- 1x 16-pin
- Recommended PSU
- 700 W
- Bus interface
- PCIe 5.0 x16
Physical / Outputs
- Length
- 360 mm
- Height
- 150 mm
- Width
- Unknown
- Slot thickness
- 4 slots
- Fans
- 3
- Cooling
- Air
- Outputs
- 3× DisplayPort · 1× HDMI
Exact board / Identity
- Board part number
- GV-N507TAORUS M-16GD
- Vendor warranty
- 3 years
Power / Interface
- Board power (TBP)
- 300 W
- Power connector
- 1x 16-pin
- Recommended PSU
- 700 W
- Bus interface
- PCIe 5.0 x16
Physical / Outputs
- Length
- 340 mm
- Height
- 140 mm
- Width
- Unknown
- Slot thickness
- 3 slots
- Fans
- 3
- Cooling
- Air
- Outputs
- 3× DisplayPort · 1× HDMI
Exact board / Identity
- Board part number
- GV-N507TAERO OC-16GD
- Vendor warranty
- 3 years
Power / Interface
- Board power (TBP)
- 300 W
- Power connector
- 1x 16-pin
- Recommended PSU
- 700 W
- Bus interface
- PCIe 5.0 x16
Physical / Outputs
- Length
- 304 mm
- Height
- 126 mm
- Width
- Unknown
- Slot thickness
- 2 slots
- Fans
- 3
- Cooling
- Air
- Outputs
- 3× DisplayPort · 1× HDMI
Exact board / Identity
- Board part number
- GV-N507TEAGLEOC ICE-16GD
- Vendor warranty
- 3 years
Power / Interface
- Board power (TBP)
- 300 W
- Power connector
- 1x 16-pin
- Recommended PSU
- 700 W
- Bus interface
- PCIe 5.0 x16
Physical / Outputs
- Length
- 304 mm
- Height
- 126 mm
- Width
- Unknown
- Slot thickness
- 2 slots
- Fans
- 3
- Cooling
- Air
- Outputs
- 3× DisplayPort · 1× HDMI
Exact board / Identity
- Board part number
- GV-N507TEAGLE OC-16GD
- Vendor warranty
- 3 years
Power / Interface
- Board power (TBP)
- 300 W
- Power connector
- 1x 16-pin
- Recommended PSU
- 700 W
- Bus interface
- PCIe 5.0 x16
Physical / Outputs
- Length
- 340 mm
- Height
- 140 mm
- Width
- Unknown
- Slot thickness
- 3 slots
- Fans
- 3
- Cooling
- Air
- Outputs
- 3× DisplayPort · 1× HDMI
Exact board / Identity
- Board part number
- GV-N507TGAMING OC-16GD
- Vendor warranty
- 3 years
Power / Interface
- Board power (TBP)
- 300 W
- Power connector
- 1x 16-pin
- Recommended PSU
- 700 W
- Bus interface
- PCIe 5.0 x16
Physical / Outputs
- Length
- 304 mm
- Height
- 126 mm
- Width
- Unknown
- Slot thickness
- 2 slots
- Fans
- 3
- Cooling
- Air
- Outputs
- 3× DisplayPort · 1× HDMI
Exact board / Identity
- Board part number
- GV-N507TWF3OC-16GD
- Vendor warranty
- 3 years
Power / Interface
- Board power (TBP)
- 300 W
- Power connector
- 1x 16-pin
- Recommended PSU
- 700 W
- Bus interface
- PCIe 5.0 x16
Physical / Outputs
- Length
- 300 mm
- Height
- 116 mm
- Width
- Unknown
- Slot thickness
- 2 slots
- Fans
- 3
- Cooling
- Air
- Outputs
- 3× DisplayPort · 1× HDMI
Exact board / Identity
- Board part number
- N507T3-16D7-176068N
- Vendor warranty
- 2 years
Power / Interface
- Board power (TBP)
- 300 W
- Power connector
- 1x 16-pin
- Recommended PSU
- 700 W
- Bus interface
- PCIe 5.0 x16
Physical / Outputs
- Length
- 338 mm
- Height
- 140 mm
- Width
- Unknown
- Slot thickness
- 2 slots
- Fans
- 3
- Cooling
- Air
- Outputs
- 3× DisplayPort · 1× HDMI
Exact board / Identity
- Board part number
- G507T-16GTC
- Vendor warranty
- 3 years
Power / Interface
- Board power (TBP)
- 300 W
- Power connector
- 1x 16-pin
- Recommended PSU
- 700 W
- Bus interface
- PCIe 5.0 x16
Physical / Outputs
- Length
- 303 mm
- Height
- 121 mm
- Width
- Unknown
- Slot thickness
- 2 slots
- Fans
- 3
- Cooling
- Air
- Outputs
- 3× DisplayPort · 1× HDMI
Exact board / Identity
- Board part number
- G507T-16S3C
- Vendor warranty
- 3 years
Power / Interface
- Board power (TBP)
- 300 W
- Power connector
- 1x 16-pin
- Recommended PSU
- 700 W
- Bus interface
- PCIe 5.0 x16
Physical / Outputs
- Length
- 303 mm
- Height
- 121 mm
- Width
- Unknown
- Slot thickness
- 2 slots
- Fans
- 3
- Cooling
- Air
- Outputs
- 3× DisplayPort · 1× HDMI
Exact board / Identity
- Board part number
- G507T-16V3C
- Vendor warranty
- 3 years
Power / Interface
- Board power (TBP)
- 300 W
- Power connector
- 1x 16-pin
- Recommended PSU
- 700 W
- Bus interface
- PCIe 5.0 x16
Physical / Outputs
- Length
- 303 mm
- Height
- 121 mm
- Width
- Unknown
- Slot thickness
- 2 slots
- Fans
- 3
- Cooling
- Air
- Outputs
- 3× DisplayPort · 1× HDMI
Exact board / Identity
- Board part number
- G507T-16V3ZC
- Vendor warranty
- 3 years
Power / Interface
- Board power (TBP)
- 300 W
- Power connector
- 1x 16-pin
- Recommended PSU
- 700 W
- Bus interface
- PCIe 5.0 x16
Physical / Outputs
- Length
- 332 mm
- Height
- 127 mm
- Width
- Unknown
- Slot thickness
- 2 slots
- Fans
- 3
- Cooling
- Air
- Outputs
- 3× DisplayPort · 1× HDMI
Exact board / Identity
- Board part number
- NE7507TS19T2-GB2031U
- Vendor warranty
- 2 years
Power / Interface
- Board power (TBP)
- 300 W
- Power connector
- 1x 16-pin
- Recommended PSU
- 700 W
- Bus interface
- PCIe 5.0 x16
Physical / Outputs
- Length
- 300 mm
- Height
- 120 mm
- Width
- Unknown
- Slot thickness
- 3 slots
- Fans
- 3
- Cooling
- Air
- Outputs
- 3× DisplayPort · 1× HDMI
Exact board / Identity
- Board part number
- VCG5070T16TFXXPB1-O
- Vendor warranty
- 3 years
Power / Interface
- Board power (TBP)
- 300 W
- Power connector
- 1x 16-pin
- Recommended PSU
- 700 W
- Bus interface
- PCIe 5.0 x16
Physical / Outputs
- Length
- 300 mm
- Height
- 120 mm
- Width
- Unknown
- Slot thickness
- 3 slots
- Fans
- 3
- Cooling
- Air
- Outputs
- 3× DisplayPort · 1× HDMI
Exact board / Identity
- Board part number
- VCG5070T16TFXPB1-O
- Vendor warranty
- 3 years
Power / Interface
- Board power (TBP)
- 300 W
- Power connector
- 1x 16-pin
- Recommended PSU
- 700 W
- Bus interface
- PCIe 5.0 x16
Physical / Outputs
- Length
- Unknown
- Height
- Unknown
- Width
- Unknown
- Slot thickness
- Unknown
- Fans
- Unknown
- Cooling
- Air
- Outputs
- Unknown
Exact board / Identity
- Board part number
- ROG-STRIX-RTX5070TI-16G-GAMING
- Vendor warranty
- 3 years
Power / Interface
- Board power (TBP)
- 300 W
- Power connector
- 1x 16-pin
- Recommended PSU
- 700 W
- Bus interface
- PCIe 5.0 x16
Physical / Outputs
- Length
- Unknown
- Height
- Unknown
- Width
- Unknown
- Slot thickness
- Unknown
- Fans
- Unknown
- Cooling
- Air
- Outputs
- Unknown
Exact board / Identity
- Board part number
- G507T-16GFEOC
- Vendor warranty
- 3 years
Power / Interface
- Board power (TBP)
- 300 W
- Power connector
- 1x 16-pin
- Recommended PSU
- 700 W
- Bus interface
- PCIe 5.0 x16
Physical / Outputs
- Length
- Unknown
- Height
- Unknown
- Width
- Unknown
- Slot thickness
- Unknown
- Fans
- Unknown
- Cooling
- Air
- Outputs
- Unknown
Exact board / Identity
- Board part number
- VCG5070T16DFSXPB1-O
- Vendor warranty
- 3 years
Select an exact version for physical dimensions and connector details.
Show all specifications
Core / Performance
- Texture units
- 280
- ROPs
- 96
- Ray tracing cores
- 70
- Tensor cores
- 280
- Base clock
- 2295 MHz
- Boost clock
- 2497 MHz
Features
- Upscaling
- DLSS 4.5 + 5
- Frame generation
- multi-frame generation
- Ray tracing
- Supported
- RGB lighting
- No
Warranty & release
- Release year
- 2025
Hover any value to see where it came from: a manufacturer specification, or a figure The Comparator calculated.
Sources: Comparator offer frame 2026-10-10–2026-10-17
What to check in your build
Varies by version
The exact requirement depends on the version you select.
Varies by version
Select a board to confirm its connector and cable-clearance needs.
Varies by version
The exact requirement depends on the version you select.
Varies by version
The exact requirement depends on the version you select.
Varies by version
Slot occupancy depends on the board cooler and thickness.
Select an exact version above for physical dimensions and connector details.
700 W PSU recommended
Whole-system figure from the board vendor — it already allows for the processor and transient spikes.
1x 16-pin required
Adapters work but add connector bulk and need extra cable-bend clearance.
Needs at least 306 mm of GPU clearance
Front radiators and fans eat into the figure a case advertises.
Leave room beyond the card for the cable bend
No verified minimum is published — measure it.
Occupies 2 slots
The cooler covers the slots below it — check nothing adjacent needs that space.
700 W PSU recommended
Whole-system figure from the board vendor — it already allows for the processor and transient spikes.
1x 16-pin required
Adapters work but add connector bulk and need extra cable-bend clearance.
Needs at least 306 mm of GPU clearance
Front radiators and fans eat into the figure a case advertises.
Leave room beyond the card for the cable bend
No verified minimum is published — measure it.
Occupies 2 slots
The cooler covers the slots below it — check nothing adjacent needs that space.
700 W PSU recommended
Whole-system figure from the board vendor — it already allows for the processor and transient spikes.
1x 16-pin required
Adapters work but add connector bulk and need extra cable-bend clearance.
Needs at least 332 mm of GPU clearance
Front radiators and fans eat into the figure a case advertises.
Leave room beyond the card for the cable bend
No verified minimum is published — measure it.
Occupies 3 slots
The cooler covers the slots below it — check nothing adjacent needs that space.
700 W PSU recommended
Whole-system figure from the board vendor — it already allows for the processor and transient spikes.
1x 16-pin required
Adapters work but add connector bulk and need extra cable-bend clearance.
Needs at least 329 mm of GPU clearance
Front radiators and fans eat into the figure a case advertises.
Leave room beyond the card for the cable bend
No verified minimum is published — measure it.
Occupies 3 slots
The cooler covers the slots below it — check nothing adjacent needs that space.
700 W PSU recommended
Whole-system figure from the board vendor — it already allows for the processor and transient spikes.
1x 16-pin required
Adapters work but add connector bulk and need extra cable-bend clearance.
Needs at least 360 mm of GPU clearance
Front radiators and fans eat into the figure a case advertises.
Leave room beyond the card for the cable bend
No verified minimum is published — measure it.
Occupies 4 slots
The cooler covers the slots below it — check nothing adjacent needs that space.
700 W PSU recommended
Whole-system figure from the board vendor — it already allows for the processor and transient spikes.
1x 16-pin required
Adapters work but add connector bulk and need extra cable-bend clearance.
Needs at least 340 mm of GPU clearance
Front radiators and fans eat into the figure a case advertises.
Leave room beyond the card for the cable bend
No verified minimum is published — measure it.
Occupies 3 slots
The cooler covers the slots below it — check nothing adjacent needs that space.
700 W PSU recommended
Whole-system figure from the board vendor — it already allows for the processor and transient spikes.
1x 16-pin required
Adapters work but add connector bulk and need extra cable-bend clearance.
Needs at least 304 mm of GPU clearance
Front radiators and fans eat into the figure a case advertises.
Leave room beyond the card for the cable bend
No verified minimum is published — measure it.
Occupies 2 slots
The cooler covers the slots below it — check nothing adjacent needs that space.
700 W PSU recommended
Whole-system figure from the board vendor — it already allows for the processor and transient spikes.
1x 16-pin required
Adapters work but add connector bulk and need extra cable-bend clearance.
Needs at least 304 mm of GPU clearance
Front radiators and fans eat into the figure a case advertises.
Leave room beyond the card for the cable bend
No verified minimum is published — measure it.
Occupies 2 slots
The cooler covers the slots below it — check nothing adjacent needs that space.
700 W PSU recommended
Whole-system figure from the board vendor — it already allows for the processor and transient spikes.
1x 16-pin required
Adapters work but add connector bulk and need extra cable-bend clearance.
Needs at least 340 mm of GPU clearance
Front radiators and fans eat into the figure a case advertises.
Leave room beyond the card for the cable bend
No verified minimum is published — measure it.
Occupies 3 slots
The cooler covers the slots below it — check nothing adjacent needs that space.
700 W PSU recommended
Whole-system figure from the board vendor — it already allows for the processor and transient spikes.
1x 16-pin required
Adapters work but add connector bulk and need extra cable-bend clearance.
Needs at least 304 mm of GPU clearance
Front radiators and fans eat into the figure a case advertises.
Leave room beyond the card for the cable bend
No verified minimum is published — measure it.
Occupies 2 slots
The cooler covers the slots below it — check nothing adjacent needs that space.
700 W PSU recommended
Whole-system figure from the board vendor — it already allows for the processor and transient spikes.
1x 16-pin required
Adapters work but add connector bulk and need extra cable-bend clearance.
Needs at least 300 mm of GPU clearance
Front radiators and fans eat into the figure a case advertises.
Leave room beyond the card for the cable bend
No verified minimum is published — measure it.
Occupies 2 slots
The cooler covers the slots below it — check nothing adjacent needs that space.
700 W PSU recommended
Whole-system figure from the board vendor — it already allows for the processor and transient spikes.
1x 16-pin required
Adapters work but add connector bulk and need extra cable-bend clearance.
Needs at least 338 mm of GPU clearance
Front radiators and fans eat into the figure a case advertises.
Leave room beyond the card for the cable bend
No verified minimum is published — measure it.
Occupies 2 slots
The cooler covers the slots below it — check nothing adjacent needs that space.
700 W PSU recommended
Whole-system figure from the board vendor — it already allows for the processor and transient spikes.
1x 16-pin required
Adapters work but add connector bulk and need extra cable-bend clearance.
Needs at least 303 mm of GPU clearance
Front radiators and fans eat into the figure a case advertises.
Leave room beyond the card for the cable bend
No verified minimum is published — measure it.
Occupies 2 slots
The cooler covers the slots below it — check nothing adjacent needs that space.
700 W PSU recommended
Whole-system figure from the board vendor — it already allows for the processor and transient spikes.
1x 16-pin required
Adapters work but add connector bulk and need extra cable-bend clearance.
Needs at least 303 mm of GPU clearance
Front radiators and fans eat into the figure a case advertises.
Leave room beyond the card for the cable bend
No verified minimum is published — measure it.
Occupies 2 slots
The cooler covers the slots below it — check nothing adjacent needs that space.
700 W PSU recommended
Whole-system figure from the board vendor — it already allows for the processor and transient spikes.
1x 16-pin required
Adapters work but add connector bulk and need extra cable-bend clearance.
Needs at least 303 mm of GPU clearance
Front radiators and fans eat into the figure a case advertises.
Leave room beyond the card for the cable bend
No verified minimum is published — measure it.
Occupies 2 slots
The cooler covers the slots below it — check nothing adjacent needs that space.
700 W PSU recommended
Whole-system figure from the board vendor — it already allows for the processor and transient spikes.
1x 16-pin required
Adapters work but add connector bulk and need extra cable-bend clearance.
Needs at least 332 mm of GPU clearance
Front radiators and fans eat into the figure a case advertises.
Leave room beyond the card for the cable bend
No verified minimum is published — measure it.
Occupies 2 slots
The cooler covers the slots below it — check nothing adjacent needs that space.
700 W PSU recommended
Whole-system figure from the board vendor — it already allows for the processor and transient spikes.
1x 16-pin required
Adapters work but add connector bulk and need extra cable-bend clearance.
Needs at least 300 mm of GPU clearance
Front radiators and fans eat into the figure a case advertises.
Leave room beyond the card for the cable bend
No verified minimum is published — measure it.
Occupies 3 slots
The cooler covers the slots below it — check nothing adjacent needs that space.
700 W PSU recommended
Whole-system figure from the board vendor — it already allows for the processor and transient spikes.
1x 16-pin required
Adapters work but add connector bulk and need extra cable-bend clearance.
Needs at least 300 mm of GPU clearance
Front radiators and fans eat into the figure a case advertises.
Leave room beyond the card for the cable bend
No verified minimum is published — measure it.
Occupies 3 slots
The cooler covers the slots below it — check nothing adjacent needs that space.
700 W PSU recommended
Whole-system figure from the board vendor — it already allows for the processor and transient spikes.
1x 16-pin required
Adapters work but add connector bulk and need extra cable-bend clearance.
Unknown
Leave room beyond the card for the cable bend
No verified minimum is published — measure it.
Unknown
700 W PSU recommended
Whole-system figure from the board vendor — it already allows for the processor and transient spikes.
1x 16-pin required
Adapters work but add connector bulk and need extra cable-bend clearance.
Unknown
Leave room beyond the card for the cable bend
No verified minimum is published — measure it.
Unknown
700 W PSU recommended
Whole-system figure from the board vendor — it already allows for the processor and transient spikes.
1x 16-pin required
Adapters work but add connector bulk and need extra cable-bend clearance.
Unknown
Leave room beyond the card for the cable bend
No verified minimum is published — measure it.
Unknown
Compare all 21 board variants
Found an error? Report this specification Email the field, corrected value and an optional source.
Compatibility guidance is practical help, not a score. Missing data is shown as unknown, never invented.
Summary
RTX 5070 Ti offers a balanced view across an all-round mix of priorities. It ranks #10 by capability in the current modelled field. Its clearest measured strength is raster index 1402. RX 9070 XT currently clears the same practical bar with stronger Relative Value.
RTX 5070 Ti offers S-grade capability for 1080p. It ranks #10 by capability in the current modelled field. Its clearest measured strength is raster index 1402. RX 9070 XT currently clears the same practical bar with stronger Relative Value.
RTX 5070 Ti offers S-grade capability for 1440p. It ranks #10 by capability in the current modelled field. Its clearest measured strength is raster index 1402. RX 9070 XT currently clears the same practical bar with stronger Relative Value.
RTX 5070 Ti offers A-grade capability for 4K. It ranks #10 by capability in the current modelled field. Its clearest measured strength is raster index 1402. RX 9070 XT currently clears the same practical bar with stronger Relative Value.
RTX 5070 Ti offers S-grade capability for Ray Tracing @ 1080p. It ranks #6 by capability in the current modelled field. Its clearest measured strength is ray-tracing index 1472. The main limitation appears when Light Use & Efficiency becomes the priority, where it grades C.
RTX 5070 Ti offers A-grade capability for Ray Tracing @ 1440p. It ranks #6 by capability in the current modelled field. Its clearest measured strength is ray-tracing index 1472. The main limitation appears when Light Use & Efficiency becomes the priority, where it grades C.
RTX 5070 Ti offers C-grade capability for Ray Tracing @ 4K. It ranks #6 by capability in the current modelled field. Its clearest measured strength is ray-tracing index 1472. The C grade is the decisive limitation for this workload.
RTX 5070 Ti offers A-grade capability for AI. It ranks #7 by capability in the current modelled field. Its clearest measured strength is ai compute index 1507. The main limitation appears when Light Use & Efficiency becomes the priority, where it grades C.
RTX 5070 Ti offers A-grade capability for 3D Rendering. It ranks #6 by capability in the current modelled field. Its clearest measured strength is raster index 1402. The main limitation appears when Light Use & Efficiency becomes the priority, where it grades C.
RTX 5070 Ti offers C-grade capability for Light Use. It ranks #39 by capability in the current modelled field. Its clearest measured strength is raster index 1402. The C grade is the decisive limitation for this workload.
FAQ
Do all RTX 5070 Ti boards have the same physical design?
No. Dimensions, slot thickness, cooling, power connectors and display outputs belong to the exact board. Use the Exact version selector before checking case or PSU fit.
How much case clearance should I allow for the RTX 5070 Ti?
Tracked boards range from 300 to 360 mm in length. Select the exact board, then also allow for front radiators or fans, card height, slot thickness and power-cable bend; length alone does not guarantee fit.
Why does Relative Value change when I choose another scenario?
Each scenario changes the weights applied to capability, price and the other published factors. The hardware facts stay fixed, but the value question changes, so its score and rank can change too.
Why can Amazon appear without a tracked price?
Amazon is shown as a discovery link when we do not have a permitted verified price snapshot. It is excluded from price comparisons, rankings and Relative Value until a compliant tracked price exists.
Useful links & sources
offer frame 2026-10-10–2026-10-17 · formula gpu-value-v1.4 · facts facts-2026-10-17 · Relative Value is an estimate from our current dataset, the selected weights and dated market prices — not an official product rating and not a price forecast. Target prices are calculation thresholds, not predictions. Methodology We are not a shop. Affiliate links may earn us a commission; they never change the calculations or the ranking.