Retailer photo of ASUS DUAL RTX 4070 SUPER EVO. View this offer in Where to buy
NVIDIA · GPU · RTX 40
RTX 4070 Super
The current RTX 4070 Super price from retailers, its key specifications, and how it performs for each job.
Works well for: 1080p Gaming, 1440p Gaming, Ray Tracing @ 1080p
Trade-offs: Current price sits $204 above the strong-value threshold (~$781)
- VRAM
- 12 GB
- Memory bandwidth
- 504 GB/s
- Board power
- 220 W
- Architecture
- Ada Lovelace
- Interface
- PCIe 4.0 x16
Move a slider and the page re-scores this product against the same market frame.
What does it cost today, and is that a good price?
Market confidence: HighAt $985 the RTX 4070 Super is priced 12% below its $1125 representative market level. Only one retailer currently backs that price, so the level is a single data point rather than a market.
Limited market: only one retailer currently has a verified offer, so treat this price as a single data point.
Prices & availability
RTX 4070 Super: current price and offers
Compare the offers we track for this model, across variants and retailers.
8 tracked offers · 1 retailers
Dated price snapshots: $985–$1,200
Prices are dated snapshots, not live quotes — confirm the final price at the store. New, refurbished and used offers are listed separately; used offers carry warranty and seller risk.
Performance and where it ranks
Two different questions, side by side. Performance compares what the hardware can do; Value compares what that capability costs at today’s price. A product can rank high on one and low on the other — that gap is the point.
Performance Balanced
How much it can do. Price plays no part in this ranking.
#18 of 51 graded graphics cards
- #15 NVIDIARTX 4070 Ti 51
- #16 AMDRX 9070 50
- #17 NVIDIARTX 3090 49
- #18 NVIDIARTX 4070 Super 49
- #19 NVIDIARTX 3080 10GB 46
- #20 AMDRX 7900 GRE 45
- #21 NVIDIARTX PRO 2000 Blackwell 44
Value Balanced
How much of that you get for today’s price.
#18 of 52 currently priced graphics cards
- #15 AMDRX 7800 XT 71
- #16 NVIDIARTX 5080 71
- #17 NVIDIARTX 4070 69
- #18 NVIDIARTX 4070 Super 68
- #19 NVIDIARTX 5060 Ti 16GB 67
- #20 AMDRX 7700 XT 67
- #21 NVIDIARTX 5050 66
Performance 1080p
How much it can do. Price plays no part in this ranking.
#18 of 51 graded graphics cards
- #15 NVIDIARTX 4070 Ti 51
- #16 AMDRX 9070 50
- #17 NVIDIARTX 3090 49
- #18 NVIDIARTX 4070 Super 49
- #19 NVIDIARTX 3080 10GB 46
- #20 AMDRX 7900 GRE 45
- #21 NVIDIARTX PRO 2000 Blackwell 44
Value 1080p
How much of that you get for today’s price.
#22 of 52 currently priced graphics cards
- #19 NVIDIARTX 5070 Ti 56
- #20 NVIDIARTX 3050 6GB 56
- #21 NVIDIARTX 4060 Ti 8GB 56
- #22 NVIDIARTX 4070 Super 54
- #23 NVIDIARTX 5060 Ti 16GB 54
- #24 NVIDIARTX 3080 10GB 52
- #25 IntelIntel Arc Pro B60 52
Performance 1440p
How much it can do. Price plays no part in this ranking.
#18 of 51 graded graphics cards
- #15 NVIDIARTX 4070 Ti 51
- #16 AMDRX 9070 50
- #17 NVIDIARTX 3090 49
- #18 NVIDIARTX 4070 Super 49
- #19 NVIDIARTX 3080 10GB 46
- #20 AMDRX 7900 GRE 45
- #21 NVIDIARTX PRO 2000 Blackwell 44
Value 1440p
How much of that you get for today’s price.
#15 of 52 currently priced graphics cards
- #12 NVIDIARTX 5060 Ti 8GB 64
- #13 NVIDIARTX 4070 Ti Super 63
- #14 AMDRX 7800 XT 61
- #15 NVIDIARTX 4070 Super 60
- #16 NVIDIARTX 4080 Super 60
- #17 NVIDIARTX 4070 58
- #18 NVIDIARTX 5060 57
Performance 4K
How much it can do. Price plays no part in this ranking.
#18 of 51 graded graphics cards
- #15 NVIDIARTX 4070 Ti 51
- #16 AMDRX 9070 50
- #17 NVIDIARTX 3090 49
- #18 NVIDIARTX 4070 Super 49
- #19 NVIDIARTX 3080 10GB 46
- #20 AMDRX 7900 GRE 45
- #21 NVIDIARTX PRO 2000 Blackwell 44
Value 4K
How much of that you get for today’s price.
#15 of 52 currently priced graphics cards
- #12 AMDRX 9060 XT 16GB 56
- #13 NVIDIARTX 4080 55
- #14 AMDRX 9070 GRE 54
- #15 NVIDIARTX 4070 Super 48
- #16 NVIDIARTX 4070 Ti 47
- #17 AMDRX 7800 XT 46
- #18 NVIDIARTX 5060 Ti 16GB 43
Performance Ray Tracing @ 1080p
How much it can do. Price plays no part in this ranking.
#11 of 41 graded graphics cards
- #8 NVIDIARTX 4070 Ti 62
- #9 AMDRX 9070 XT 62
- #10 NVIDIARTX 5070 59
- #11 NVIDIARTX 4070 Super 58
- #12 NVIDIARTX 3090 Ti 58
- #13 AMDRX 7900 XTX 56
- #14 AMDRX 9070 54
Value Ray Tracing @ 1080p
How much of that you get for today’s price.
#14 of 52 currently priced graphics cards
- #11 NVIDIARTX 4080 Super 64
- #12 NVIDIARTX 5060 63
- #13 NVIDIARTX 4070 Ti Super 63
- #14 NVIDIARTX 4070 Super 62
- #15 NVIDIARTX 4070 60
- #16 NVIDIARTX 4070 Ti 60
- #17 NVIDIARTX 5060 Ti 16GB 59
Performance Ray Tracing @ 1440p
How much it can do. Price plays no part in this ranking.
#15 of 43 graded graphics cards
- #12 AMDRX 7900 XTX 50
- #13 AMDRX 9070 47
- #14 NVIDIARTX 3090 47
- #15 NVIDIARTX 4070 Super 43
- #16 AMDRX 7900 XT 43
- #17 NVIDIARTX 5060 Ti 16GB 39
- #18 NVIDIARTX 4070 38
Value Ray Tracing @ 1440p
How much of that you get for today’s price.
#13 of 52 currently priced graphics cards
- #10 NVIDIARTX 4070 Ti Super 62
- #11 NVIDIARTX 5090 62
- #12 NVIDIARTX 5060 Ti 8GB 61
- #13 NVIDIARTX 4070 Super 59
- #14 IntelArc B570 57
- #15 NVIDIARTX 4080 57
- #16 NVIDIARTX 4070 Ti 56
Performance Ray Tracing @ 4K
How much it can do. Price plays no part in this ranking.
#16 of 43 graded graphics cards
- #13 NVIDIARTX 4070 Ti 37
- #14 AMDRX 7900 XT 36
- #15 NVIDIARTX 5070 35
- #16 NVIDIARTX 4070 Super 34
- #17 NVIDIARTX 5060 Ti 16GB 32
- #18 NVIDIARTX 4070 30
- #19 AMDRX 9070 GRE 24
Value Ray Tracing @ 4K
How much of that you get for today’s price.
#15 of 52 currently priced graphics cards
- #12 AMDRX 7900 XT 48
- #13 AMDRX 9070 GRE 47
- #14 AMDRX 9060 XT 16GB 47
- #15 NVIDIARTX 4070 Super 44
- #16 NVIDIARTX 4070 Ti 44
- #17 NVIDIARTX 5060 Ti 16GB 42
- #18 NVIDIARTX 4070 38
Performance AI
How much it can do. Price plays no part in this ranking.
#12 of 51 graded graphics cards
- #9 NVIDIARTX 4070 Ti 38
- #10 NVIDIARTX 3090 Ti 38
- #11 NVIDIARTX 3090 34
- #12 NVIDIARTX 4070 Super 34
- #13 NVIDIARTX 5070 29
- #14 NVIDIARTX 3080 10GB 28
- #15 NVIDIARTX 4070 28
Value AI
How much of that you get for today’s price.
#13 of 52 currently priced graphics cards
- #10 NVIDIARTX 3090 Ti 33
- #11 AMDRX 9070 XT 27
- #12 NVIDIARTX 4070 Ti 27
- #13 NVIDIARTX 4070 Super 27
- #14 NVIDIARTX 5070 26
- #15 NVIDIARTX 3090 25
- #16 NVIDIARTX 4070 23
Performance 3D Rendering
How much it can do. Price plays no part in this ranking.
#12 of 39 graded graphics cards
- #9 NVIDIARTX 3090 Ti 43
- #10 NVIDIARTX 5070 41
- #11 NVIDIARTX 4070 41
- #12 NVIDIARTX 4070 Super 40
- #13 NVIDIARTX 3090 35
- #14 NVIDIARTX 3080 10GB 31
- #15 NVIDIARTX 4060 Ti 8GB 28
Value 3D Rendering
How much of that you get for today’s price.
#11 of 52 currently priced graphics cards
- #8 AMDRX 9070 XT 41
- #9 NVIDIARTX 4070 Ti 41
- #10 NVIDIARTX 5070 40
- #11 NVIDIARTX 4070 Super 40
- #12 NVIDIARTX 4070 34
- #13 NVIDIARTX 3090 Ti 32
- #14 NVIDIARTX PRO 4000 Blackwell 31
Performance Light Use
How much it can do. Price plays no part in this ranking.
#28 of 50 graded graphics cards
- #25 NVIDIARTX 3060 Ti 68
- #26 AMDRX 9070 GRE 65
- #27 AMDRX 9070 63
- #28 NVIDIARTX 4070 Super 63
- #29 IntelArc A750 62
- #30 IntelArc A770 62
- #31 AMDRX 7700 XT 57
Value Light Use
How much of that you get for today’s price.
#30 of 52 currently priced graphics cards
- #27 NVIDIARTX 4070 22
- #28 AMDRX 7700 XT 22
- #29 AMDRX 9070 XT 21
- #30 NVIDIARTX 4070 Super 20
- #31 IntelIntel Arc Pro B70 19
- #32 AMDRX 7800 XT 18
- #33 IntelArc A770 18
These ladders follow the preset scenario shown above. Your own weights re-score this product, not the whole field.
What it is good for
| Scenario | this productCapability grade · Value at current price | Higher capability | Higher Value with current priorities |
|---|---|---|---|
| Balanced (all-round)Weighted all-round view | GradeNo grade Value68 | Higher capability Higher capability · Higher Value with current priorities RX 9070 XT 100 +22% capability · -19% price | |
| 1080p GamingRaster performance · 1080p | GradeS Value54 | Higher capability Higher capability · Higher Value with current priorities RX 9070 XT S 84 +22% capability · -19% price | |
| 1440p GamingRaster performance · 1440p | GradeA Value60 | Higher capability Higher capability · Higher Value with current priorities RX 9070 XT S 100 +22% capability · -19% price | |
| 4K / VRRaster performance · 4K / VR | GradeB Value48 | Higher capability Higher capability · Higher Value with current priorities RX 9070 XT A 84 +22% capability · -19% price | |
| Ray Tracing @ 1080pRay tracing capability · 1080p | GradeA Value62 | Higher capability RTX 5070 Ti S 76 +25% capability · +20% price | Higher Value with current priorities RX 9070 XT A 100 +7% capability · -19% price |
| Ray Tracing @ 1440pRay tracing capability · 1440p | GradeC Value59 | Higher capability RTX 5070 Ti A 76 +52% capability · +20% price | Higher Value with current priorities RX 9070 XT B 100 +27% capability · -19% price |
| Ray Tracing @ 4KRay tracing capability · 4K | GradeD Value44 | Higher capability RTX 5070 Ti C 65 +66% capability · +20% price | Higher Value with current priorities RX 9070 XT C 77 +36% capability · -19% price |
| AI / Local LLMAI compute · memory and ecosystem fit | GradeB Value27 | Higher capability RTX 5070 Ti A 42 +24% capability · +20% price | — |
| 3D Rendering3D rendering · creator workloads | GradeB Value40 | Higher capability RTX 5070 Ti A 58 +29% capability · +20% price | — |
| Light Use & EfficiencyEfficiency · lighter workloads | GradeC Value20 | Higher capability RTX 3050 6GB S 97 +58% capability · -69% price | Higher Value with current priorities Arc A380 S 100 +56% capability · -84% price |
Balanced has no letter: it is a weighting preset, not a capability rubric. A grade answers “how well does this handle that job?” — price is never part of it. Relative Value puts the current market price back in.
Compare these grades with the full tier list
Browse shortlists for different uses
Trade-offs
Works well if
- 1080p Gaming is your main prioritygraded S for 1080p Gaming on the same rubric as the tier list
- Strong-value threshold: ~$781$781 is where Relative Value reaches 80 with Balanced priorities, in the 2026-10-10–2026-10-16 offer frame
- You want memory headroom — memory is not what limits it hereno memory cap applies to this grade — the raster index sets it, not the frame buffer
Consider other options if
- Current price sits $204 above the strong-value threshold (~$781)cheapest tracked $985 against a $781 calculated threshold with Balanced priorities
- Value for money matters more to you than this exact modelRX 9070 XT holds Relative Value 100 against its 68 with Balanced priorities, at $800
- Ray Tracing @ 2K (1440p) is what you actually need it forit grades only C there
Works well if
- 1080p is your main priority — S here means 144 Hz+ ultra with headroomgraded S for 1080p on the same rubric as the tier list
- Strong-value threshold: ~$666$666 is where Relative Value reaches 80 for 1080p, in the 2026-10-10–2026-10-16 offer frame
- You want memory headroom — 12 GB is above what this job needsthe same card with 8 GB grades A for 1080p; this one has 12 GB and hits no memory cap
Consider other options if
- Current price sits $319 above the strong-value threshold (~$666)cheapest tracked $985 against a $666 calculated threshold for 1080p
- Value for money matters more to you than this exact modelRX 9070 XT holds Relative Value 84 against its 54 for 1080p, at $800
- Ray Tracing @ 2K (1440p) is what you actually need it forit grades only C there
Works well if
- 1440p is your main prioritygraded A for 1440p on the same rubric as the tier list
- Strong-value threshold: ~$676$676 is where Relative Value reaches 80 for 1440p, in the 2026-10-10–2026-10-16 offer frame
- You want memory headroom — 12 GB is above what this job needsthe same card with 10 GB grades B for 1440p; this one has 12 GB and hits no memory cap
Consider other options if
- Current price sits $309 above the strong-value threshold (~$676)cheapest tracked $985 against a $676 calculated threshold for 1440p
- Value for money matters more to you than this exact modelRX 9070 XT holds Relative Value 100 against its 60 for 1440p, at $800
- Ray Tracing @ 2K (1440p) is what you actually need it forit grades only C there
Works well if
- 4K is your main prioritygraded B for 4K on the same rubric as the tier list
- You want memory headroom — 12 GB is above what this job needsthe same card with 10 GB grades C for 4K; this one has 12 GB and hits no memory cap
- DLSS 4.5 with frame generation matters to yousecond-generation transformer upscaler + frame generation — derived from the ada architecture, not from a scraped feature flag
Consider other options if
- You want strong value for 4K specificallyat today's market no realistic price for this model reaches strong value for 4K — the calculation only gets there near $322, against a cheapest tracked $985
- Value for money matters more to you than this exact modelRX 9070 XT holds Relative Value 84 against its 48 for 4K, at $800
- Ray Tracing @ 2K (1440p) is what you actually need it forit grades only C there
Works well if
- Ray Tracing @ 1080p is your main priority — A here means playablegraded A for Ray Tracing @ 1080p on the same rubric as the tier list, from 73 fps measured natively (upscaling typically adds 40–60% on top)
- Strong-value threshold: ~$689$689 is where Relative Value reaches 80 for Ray Tracing @ 1080p, in the 2026-10-10–2026-10-16 offer frame
- You want memory headroom — memory is not what limits it hereno memory cap applies to this grade for Ray Tracing @ 1080p — the raster index sets it, not the frame buffer
Consider other options if
- Current price sits $296 above the strong-value threshold (~$689)cheapest tracked $985 against a $689 calculated threshold for Ray Tracing @ 1080p
- Value for money matters more to you than this exact modelRX 9070 XT holds Relative Value 100 against its 62 for Ray Tracing @ 1080p, at $800
- Ray Tracing @ 2K (1440p) is what you actually need it forit grades only C there
For the selected scenario this is not a strong fit — the grade above is the reason, and the models below suit it better.
Works well if
- Ray Tracing @ 1440p is not actually your main job — 1080p Gaming isit grades C for Ray Tracing @ 1440p, but S for 1080p Gaming
Consider other options if
- Ray Tracing @ 1440p is what you actually need it forit grades C there; RTX 5070 Ti grades A at $1180
- You want strong value for Ray Tracing @ 1440p specificallyat today's market no realistic price for this model reaches strong value for Ray Tracing @ 1440p — the calculation only gets there near $632, against a cheapest tracked $985
- Value for money matters more to you than this exact modelRX 9070 XT holds Relative Value 100 against its 59 for Ray Tracing @ 1440p, at $800
For the selected scenario this is not a strong fit — the grade above is the reason, and the models below suit it better.
Works well if
- Ray Tracing @ 4K is not actually your main job — 1080p Gaming isit grades D for Ray Tracing @ 4K, but S for 1080p Gaming
Consider other options if
- Ray Tracing @ 4K is what you actually need it forit grades D there; RTX 5070 Ti grades C at $1180
- You want strong value for Ray Tracing @ 4K specificallycompeting products deliver so much more for Ray Tracing @ 4K per dollar that no price this model realistically trades at reaches the strong-value mark for this job
- Value for money matters more to you than this exact modelRX 9070 XT holds Relative Value 77 against its 44 for Ray Tracing @ 4K, at $800
Works well if
- AI is your main prioritygraded B for AI on the same rubric as the tier list
- You want memory headroom — 12 GB is above what this job needsthe same card with 10 GB grades C for AI; this one has 12 GB and hits no memory cap
- DLSS 4.5 with frame generation matters to yousecond-generation transformer upscaler + frame generation — derived from the ada architecture, not from a scraped feature flag
Consider other options if
- You want strong value for AI specificallycompeting products deliver so much more for AI per dollar that no price this model realistically trades at reaches the strong-value mark for this job
- Ray Tracing @ 2K (1440p) is what you actually need it forit grades only C there
Works well if
- 3D Rendering is your main prioritygraded B for 3D Rendering on the same rubric as the tier list
- You want memory headroom — 12 GB is above what this job needsthe same card with 6 GB grades C for 3D Rendering; this one has 12 GB and hits no memory cap
- DLSS 4.5 with frame generation matters to yousecond-generation transformer upscaler + frame generation — derived from the ada architecture, not from a scraped feature flag
Consider other options if
- You want strong value for 3D Rendering specificallyat today's market no realistic price for this model reaches strong value for 3D Rendering — the calculation only gets there near $308, against a cheapest tracked $985
- Value for money matters more to you than this exact modelRTX 5070 holds Relative Value 40 against its 40 for 3D Rendering, at $856
- Ray Tracing @ 2K (1440p) is what you actually need it forit grades only C there
For the selected scenario this is not a strong fit — the grade above is the reason, and the models below suit it better.
Works well if
- Light Use is not actually your main job — 1080p Gaming isit grades C for Light Use, but S for 1080p Gaming
Consider other options if
- Light Use is what you actually need it forit grades C there; RTX 3050 6GB grades S at $307
- You want strong value for Light Use specificallycompeting products deliver so much more for Light Use per dollar that no price this model realistically trades at reaches the strong-value mark for this job
- Value for money matters more to you than this exact modelArc A380 holds Relative Value 100 against its 20 for Light Use, at $160
Every line states the fact it was derived from, for the scenario selected above. Thresholds are calculated points on our value curve — information about where the maths turns, not instructions about what to pay.
Similar options to the RTX 4070 Super
Chosen for Balanced
Chosen for 1080p
Chosen for 1440p
Chosen for 4K
Chosen for Ray Tracing @ 1080p
Chosen for Ray Tracing @ 1440p
Chosen for Ray Tracing @ 4K
Chosen for AI
This scenario carries a requirement candidates are checked against first: CUDA — Many local-LLM and diffusion toolchains are CUDA-only. ROCm and Vulkan builds exist and work, but they are not drop-in — check your toolchain before treating a non-NVIDIA card as an equivalent swap.
Chosen for 3D Rendering
This scenario carries a requirement candidates are checked against first: OptiX — Blender Cycles reaches its fastest path on NVIDIA OptiX. HIP (AMD) and oneAPI (Intel) render the same scenes, so this is a workflow question, not a capability wall — but render times and add-on support differ.
Chosen for Light Use
Alternatives stay near this product’s price range. Step-up options may exceed the standard budget envelope when the capability gain is meaningful.
More head-to-head comparisons in this category
Upgrade planner
Judge the change in the active scenario, then make the cash gap explicit.
Using page scenarioWhat are you upgrading from? These are the axes we compare on, and where this product stands in the current market.
We rank upgrades by out-of-pocket cost — the new price minus what yours is worth — not by sticker price.
Only candidates that clear the configured meaningful-upgrade gate will be shown; roles are omitted rather than filled.
Capability differences are expressed as tiers and index points, not as benchmark percentages we did not measure.
Specifications and compatibility
What this product is, and what to check before it goes into your build.
Core / Performance
- Architecture
- Ada Lovelace
- GPU chip
- AD104
- GPU variant
- AD104-350-A1
- Process node
- 5 nm
- Transistors
- 35,800 million
- Shading units
- 7168
Memory
- Capacity
- 12 GB
- Type
- GDDR6X
- Bus width
- 192 bit
- Effective speed
- 21 Gbps
- Bandwidth
- 504 GB/s
Power / Interface
- Board power (TBP)
- 220 W
- Power connector
- Varies by version
- Recommended PSU
- Varies by version
- Bus interface
- PCIe 4.0 x16
Physical / Outputs
- Length
- Varies by version227–339 mm across tracked variants
- Height
- Varies by version120–149 mm across tracked variants
- Width
- Varies by version
- Slot thickness
- Varies by version2–3 across tracked variants
- Fans
- Varies by version2–3 across tracked variants
- Cooling
- Varies by version
- Outputs
- Varies by version
Power / Interface
- Board power (TBP)
- 220 W
- Power connector
- 1x 16-pin
- Recommended PSU
- 550 W
- Bus interface
- PCIe 4.0 x16
Physical / Outputs
- Length
- 227 mm
- Height
- 123 mm
- Width
- Unknown
- Slot thickness
- 2 slots
- Fans
- 2
- Cooling
- Air
- Outputs
- 3× DisplayPort · 1× HDMI
Exact board / Identity
- Board part number
- DUAL-RTX4070S-12G-EVO
- Vendor warranty
- 3 years
Power / Interface
- Board power (TBP)
- 220 W
- Power connector
- 1x 16-pin
- Recommended PSU
- 550 W
- Bus interface
- PCIe 4.0 x16
Physical / Outputs
- Length
- 227 mm
- Height
- 123 mm
- Width
- Unknown
- Slot thickness
- 2 slots
- Fans
- 2
- Cooling
- Air
- Outputs
- 3× DisplayPort · 1× HDMI
Exact board / Identity
- Board part number
- DUAL-RTX4070S-O12G-EVO
- Vendor warranty
- 3 years
Power / Interface
- Board power (TBP)
- 220 W
- Power connector
- 1x 16-pin
- Recommended PSU
- 550 W
- Bus interface
- PCIe 4.0 x16
Physical / Outputs
- Length
- 269 mm
- Height
- 120 mm
- Width
- Unknown
- Slot thickness
- 2 slots
- Fans
- 2
- Cooling
- Air
- Outputs
- 3× DisplayPort · 1× HDMI
Exact board / Identity
- Board part number
- PRIME-RTX4070S-O12G
- Vendor warranty
- 3 years
Power / Interface
- Board power (TBP)
- 220 W
- Power connector
- 1x 16-pin
- Recommended PSU
- 550 W
- Bus interface
- PCIe 4.0 x16
Physical / Outputs
- Length
- 339 mm
- Height
- 149 mm
- Width
- Unknown
- Slot thickness
- 3 slots
- Fans
- 3
- Cooling
- Air
- Outputs
- 3× DisplayPort · 2× HDMI
Exact board / Identity
- Board part number
- ROG-STRIX-RTX4070S-12G-GAMING
- Vendor warranty
- 3 years
Power / Interface
- Board power (TBP)
- 220 W
- Power connector
- 1x 16-pin
- Recommended PSU
- 550 W
- Bus interface
- PCIe 4.0 x16
Physical / Outputs
- Length
- 339 mm
- Height
- 149 mm
- Width
- Unknown
- Slot thickness
- 3 slots
- Fans
- 3
- Cooling
- Air
- Outputs
- 3× DisplayPort · 2× HDMI
Exact board / Identity
- Board part number
- ROG-STRIX-RTX4070S-O12G-GAMING
- Vendor warranty
- 3 years
Power / Interface
- Board power (TBP)
- 220 W
- Power connector
- 1x 16-pin
- Recommended PSU
- 550 W
- Bus interface
- PCIe 4.0 x16
Physical / Outputs
- Length
- 301 mm
- Height
- 139 mm
- Width
- Unknown
- Slot thickness
- 3 slots
- Fans
- 3
- Cooling
- Air
- Outputs
- 3× DisplayPort · 2× HDMI
Exact board / Identity
- Board part number
- TUF-RTX4070S-12G-GAMING
- Vendor warranty
- 3 years
Power / Interface
- Board power (TBP)
- 220 W
- Power connector
- 1x 16-pin
- Recommended PSU
- 550 W
- Bus interface
- PCIe 4.0 x16
Physical / Outputs
- Length
- 301 mm
- Height
- 139 mm
- Width
- Unknown
- Slot thickness
- 3 slots
- Fans
- 3
- Cooling
- Air
- Outputs
- 3× DisplayPort · 2× HDMI
Exact board / Identity
- Board part number
- TUF-RTX4070S-O12G-GAMING
- Vendor warranty
- 3 years
Power / Interface
- Board power (TBP)
- 220 W
- Power connector
- 1x 16-pin
- Recommended PSU
- 550 W
- Bus interface
- PCIe 4.0 x16
Physical / Outputs
- Length
- 261 mm
- Height
- 126 mm
- Width
- Unknown
- Slot thickness
- 2 slots
- Fans
- 2
- Cooling
- Air
- Outputs
- 3× DisplayPort · 1× HDMI
Exact board / Identity
- Board part number
- GV-N407SWF3OC-12GD
- Vendor warranty
- 3 years
Select an exact version for physical dimensions and connector details.
Show all specifications
Core / Performance
- Texture units
- 224
- ROPs
- 80
- Ray tracing cores
- 56
- Tensor cores
- 224
- Base clock
- 1980 MHz
- Boost clock
- 2475 MHz
Features
- Upscaling
- DLSS 4.5
- Frame generation
- frame generation
- Ray tracing
- Supported
- RGB lighting
- No
Warranty & release
- Release year
- 2024
Hover any value to see where it came from: a manufacturer specification, or a figure The Comparator calculated.
Sources: Comparator offer frame 2026-10-10–2026-10-16
What to check in your build
Varies by version
The exact requirement depends on the version you select.
Varies by version
Select a board to confirm its connector and cable-clearance needs.
Varies by version
The exact requirement depends on the version you select.
Varies by version
The exact requirement depends on the version you select.
Varies by version
Slot occupancy depends on the board cooler and thickness.
Select an exact version above for physical dimensions and connector details.
550 W PSU recommended
Whole-system figure from the board vendor — it already allows for the processor and transient spikes.
1x 16-pin required
Adapters work but add connector bulk and need extra cable-bend clearance.
Needs at least 227 mm of GPU clearance
Front radiators and fans eat into the figure a case advertises.
Leave room beyond the card for the cable bend
No verified minimum is published — measure it.
Occupies 2 slots
The cooler covers the slots below it — check nothing adjacent needs that space.
550 W PSU recommended
Whole-system figure from the board vendor — it already allows for the processor and transient spikes.
1x 16-pin required
Adapters work but add connector bulk and need extra cable-bend clearance.
Needs at least 227 mm of GPU clearance
Front radiators and fans eat into the figure a case advertises.
Leave room beyond the card for the cable bend
No verified minimum is published — measure it.
Occupies 2 slots
The cooler covers the slots below it — check nothing adjacent needs that space.
550 W PSU recommended
Whole-system figure from the board vendor — it already allows for the processor and transient spikes.
1x 16-pin required
Adapters work but add connector bulk and need extra cable-bend clearance.
Needs at least 269 mm of GPU clearance
Front radiators and fans eat into the figure a case advertises.
Leave room beyond the card for the cable bend
No verified minimum is published — measure it.
Occupies 2 slots
The cooler covers the slots below it — check nothing adjacent needs that space.
550 W PSU recommended
Whole-system figure from the board vendor — it already allows for the processor and transient spikes.
1x 16-pin required
Adapters work but add connector bulk and need extra cable-bend clearance.
Needs at least 339 mm of GPU clearance
Front radiators and fans eat into the figure a case advertises.
Leave room beyond the card for the cable bend
No verified minimum is published — measure it.
Occupies 3 slots
The cooler covers the slots below it — check nothing adjacent needs that space.
550 W PSU recommended
Whole-system figure from the board vendor — it already allows for the processor and transient spikes.
1x 16-pin required
Adapters work but add connector bulk and need extra cable-bend clearance.
Needs at least 339 mm of GPU clearance
Front radiators and fans eat into the figure a case advertises.
Leave room beyond the card for the cable bend
No verified minimum is published — measure it.
Occupies 3 slots
The cooler covers the slots below it — check nothing adjacent needs that space.
550 W PSU recommended
Whole-system figure from the board vendor — it already allows for the processor and transient spikes.
1x 16-pin required
Adapters work but add connector bulk and need extra cable-bend clearance.
Needs at least 301 mm of GPU clearance
Front radiators and fans eat into the figure a case advertises.
Leave room beyond the card for the cable bend
No verified minimum is published — measure it.
Occupies 3 slots
The cooler covers the slots below it — check nothing adjacent needs that space.
550 W PSU recommended
Whole-system figure from the board vendor — it already allows for the processor and transient spikes.
1x 16-pin required
Adapters work but add connector bulk and need extra cable-bend clearance.
Needs at least 301 mm of GPU clearance
Front radiators and fans eat into the figure a case advertises.
Leave room beyond the card for the cable bend
No verified minimum is published — measure it.
Occupies 3 slots
The cooler covers the slots below it — check nothing adjacent needs that space.
550 W PSU recommended
Whole-system figure from the board vendor — it already allows for the processor and transient spikes.
1x 16-pin required
Adapters work but add connector bulk and need extra cable-bend clearance.
Needs at least 261 mm of GPU clearance
Front radiators and fans eat into the figure a case advertises.
Leave room beyond the card for the cable bend
No verified minimum is published — measure it.
Occupies 2 slots
The cooler covers the slots below it — check nothing adjacent needs that space.
Compare all 8 board variants
| Variant | Length | Slot thickness | Power connector | Recommended PSU |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ASUS DUAL RTX 4070 SUPER EVO | 227 mm | 2 | 1x 16-pin | 550 W |
| ASUS DUAL RTX 4070 SUPER EVO OC | 227 mm | 2 | 1x 16-pin | 550 W |
| ASUS PRIME RTX 4070 SUPER OC | 269 mm | 2 | 1x 16-pin | 550 W |
| ASUS ROG STRIX RTX 4070 SUPER GAMING | 339 mm | 3 | 1x 16-pin | 550 W |
| ASUS ROG STRIX RTX 4070 SUPER GAMING OC | 339 mm | 3 | 1x 16-pin | 550 W |
| ASUS TUF RTX 4070 SUPER GAMING | 301 mm | 3 | 1x 16-pin | 550 W |
| ASUS TUF RTX 4070 SUPER GAMING OC | 301 mm | 3 | 1x 16-pin | 550 W |
| GIGABYTE RTX 4070 SUPER WINDFORCE OC | 261 mm | 2 | 1x 16-pin | 550 W |
Found an error? Report this specification Email the field, corrected value and an optional source.
Compatibility guidance is practical help, not a score. Missing data is shown as unknown, never invented.
Summary
RTX 4070 Super offers a balanced view across an all-round mix of priorities. It ranks #18 by capability in the current modelled field. Its clearest measured strength is raster index 1160. The main limitation appears when Ray Tracing @ 2K (1440p) becomes the priority, where it grades C.
RTX 4070 Super offers S-grade capability for 1080p. It ranks #18 by capability in the current modelled field. Its clearest measured strength is raster index 1160. The main limitation appears when Ray Tracing @ 2K (1440p) becomes the priority, where it grades C.
RTX 4070 Super offers A-grade capability for 1440p. It ranks #18 by capability in the current modelled field. Its clearest measured strength is raster index 1160. The main limitation appears when Ray Tracing @ 2K (1440p) becomes the priority, where it grades C.
RTX 4070 Super offers B-grade capability for 4K. It ranks #18 by capability in the current modelled field. Its clearest measured strength is raster index 1160. The main limitation appears when Ray Tracing @ 2K (1440p) becomes the priority, where it grades C.
RTX 4070 Super offers A-grade capability for Ray Tracing @ 1080p. It ranks #11 by capability in the current modelled field. Its clearest measured strength is ray-tracing index 1167. RX 9070 XT currently clears the same practical bar with stronger Relative Value.
RTX 4070 Super offers C-grade capability for Ray Tracing @ 1440p. It ranks #15 by capability in the current modelled field. Its clearest measured strength is ray-tracing index 1167. The C grade is the decisive limitation for this workload.
RTX 4070 Super offers D-grade capability for Ray Tracing @ 4K. It ranks #16 by capability in the current modelled field. Its clearest measured strength is ray-tracing index 1167. The D grade is the decisive limitation for this workload.
RTX 4070 Super offers B-grade capability for AI. It ranks #12 by capability in the current modelled field. Its clearest measured strength is ai compute index 1217. The main limitation appears when Ray Tracing @ 2K (1440p) becomes the priority, where it grades C.
RTX 4070 Super offers B-grade capability for 3D Rendering. It ranks #12 by capability in the current modelled field. Its clearest measured strength is raster index 1160. RTX 5070 currently clears the same practical bar with stronger Relative Value.
RTX 4070 Super offers C-grade capability for Light Use. It ranks #28 by capability in the current modelled field. Its clearest measured strength is raster index 1160. The C grade is the decisive limitation for this workload.
FAQ
Do all RTX 4070 Super boards have the same physical design?
No. Dimensions, slot thickness, cooling, power connectors and display outputs belong to the exact board. Use the Exact version selector before checking case or PSU fit.
How much case clearance should I allow for the RTX 4070 Super?
Tracked boards range from 227 to 339 mm in length. Select the exact board, then also allow for front radiators or fans, card height, slot thickness and power-cable bend; length alone does not guarantee fit.
Why does Relative Value change when I choose another scenario?
Each scenario changes the weights applied to capability, price and the other published factors. The hardware facts stay fixed, but the value question changes, so its score and rank can change too.
Why can Amazon appear without a tracked price?
Amazon is shown as a discovery link when we do not have a permitted verified price snapshot. It is excluded from price comparisons, rankings and Relative Value until a compliant tracked price exists.
Useful links & sources
offer frame 2026-10-10–2026-10-16 · formula gpu-value-v1.4 · facts facts-2026-10-16 · Relative Value is an estimate from our current dataset, the selected weights and dated market prices — not an official product rating and not a price forecast. Target prices are calculation thresholds, not predictions. Methodology We are not a shop. Affiliate links may earn us a commission; they never change the calculations or the ranking.