Retailer photo of ASUS DUAL RTX 3050 OC 6 GB. View this offer in Where to buy
NVIDIA · GPU · RTX 30
RTX 3050 6GB
The current RTX 3050 6GB price from retailers, its key specifications, and how it performs for each job.
Works well for: Light Use & Efficiency
Trade-offs: you want strong value with Balanced priorities specifically
- Memory bandwidth
- 168 GB/s
- Board power
- 70 W
- Architecture
- Ampere
- Interface
- PCIe 4.0 x8
Move a slider and the page re-scores this product against the same market frame.
What does it cost today, and is that a good price?
Market confidence: MediumAt $307 the RTX 3050 6GB is priced 24% below its $403 representative market level. Arc A380 currently does the same job for $160.
Consider: Arc A750 offers stronger value around $210.Compare
Prices & availability
RTX 3050 6GB: current price and offers
Compare the offers we track for this model, across variants and retailers.
4 tracked offers · 2 retailers
| Variant | Store | Condition | Price (snapshot) | Value · Balanced | Checked | Offer link |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ASUS DUAL RTX 3050 OC 6 GB | Newegg | New | $307 | 51 | 2026-10-17 | View offer → |
| ASUS DUAL RTX 3050 6 GB | Newegg | New | $380 | 44 | 2026-10-11 | View offer → |
| GIGABYTE RTX 3050 OC Low Profile 6 GB | Newegg | New | $426 | 40 | 2026-10-16 | View offer → |
| GIGABYTE RTX 3050 OC Low Profile 6 GB | MemoryC | New | $502 | 36 | 2026-10-11 | View offer → |
| RTX 3050 6GBMultiple variants available | Amazon Affiliate | Varies | Find on Amazon | Not tracked | No price snapshot | Find on Amazon → |
Prices are dated snapshots, not live quotes — confirm the final price at the store. New, refurbished and used offers are listed separately; used offers carry warranty and seller risk.
Performance and where it ranks
Two different questions, side by side. Performance compares what the hardware can do; Value compares what that capability costs at today’s price. A product can rank high on one and low on the other — that gap is the point.
Performance Balanced
How much it can do. Price plays no part in this ranking.
#47 of 51 graded graphics cards
- #44 AMDRX 7600 21
- #45 IntelArc A580 18
- #46 AMDRX 6600 17
- #47 NVIDIARTX 3050 6GB 15
- #48 NVIDIARTX 3050 8GB 15
- #49 AMDRX 6500 XT 4GB 8
- #50 NVIDIAGTX 1650 8
Value Balanced
How much of that you get for today’s price.
#35 of 52 currently priced graphics cards
- #32 NVIDIARTX 4060 54
- #33 NVIDIARTX 3070 Ti 52
- #34 IntelIntel Arc Pro B70 51
- #35 NVIDIARTX 3050 6GB 51
- #36 NVIDIARTX 3060 Ti 50
- #37 NVIDIARTX 3060 12GB 49
- #38 AMDRadeon AI Pro R9700 48
Performance 1080p
How much it can do. Price plays no part in this ranking.
#47 of 51 graded graphics cards
- #44 AMDRX 7600 21
- #45 IntelArc A580 18
- #46 AMDRX 6600 17
- #47 NVIDIARTX 3050 6GB 15
- #48 NVIDIARTX 3050 8GB 15
- #49 AMDRX 6500 XT 4GB 8
- #50 NVIDIAGTX 1650 8
Value 1080p
How much of that you get for today’s price.
#20 of 52 currently priced graphics cards
- #17 NVIDIARTX 4070 58
- #18 NVIDIARTX 5070 Ti 57
- #19 AMDRX 7900 XT 57
- #20 NVIDIARTX 3050 6GB 56
- #21 NVIDIARTX 4060 Ti 8GB 56
- #22 NVIDIARTX 4070 Super 54
- #23 NVIDIARTX 5060 Ti 16GB 54
Performance 1440p
How much it can do. Price plays no part in this ranking.
#47 of 51 graded graphics cards
- #44 AMDRX 7600 21
- #45 IntelArc A580 18
- #46 AMDRX 6600 17
- #47 NVIDIARTX 3050 6GB 15
- #48 NVIDIARTX 3050 8GB 15
- #49 AMDRX 6500 XT 4GB 8
- #50 NVIDIAGTX 1650 8
Value 1440p
How much of that you get for today’s price.
#42 of 52 currently priced graphics cards
- #39 NVIDIARTX 3060 Ti 34
- #40 NVIDIARTX 3060 12GB 34
- #41 IntelArc A770 30
- #42 NVIDIARTX 3050 6GB 28
- #43 NVIDIARTX 3090 28
- #44 NVIDIARTX PRO 4000 Blackwell 27
- #45 NVIDIARTX PRO 2000 Blackwell 25
Performance 4K
How much it can do. Price plays no part in this ranking.
#47 of 51 graded graphics cards
- #44 AMDRX 7600 21
- #45 IntelArc A580 18
- #46 AMDRX 6600 17
- #47 NVIDIARTX 3050 6GB 15
- #48 NVIDIARTX 3050 8GB 15
- #49 AMDRX 6500 XT 4GB 8
- #50 NVIDIAGTX 1650 8
Value 4K
How much of that you get for today’s price.
#46 of 52 currently priced graphics cards
- #43 NVIDIARTX 3060 Ti 17
- #44 AMDRX 7600 16
- #45 NVIDIARTX 2000 Ada 13
- #46 NVIDIARTX 3050 6GB 11
- #47 NVIDIARTX 3050 8GB 10
- #48 AMDRX 6600 9
- #49 IntelArc A380 5
Performance Ray Tracing @ 1080p
How much it can do. Price plays no part in this ranking.
#35 of 41 graded graphics cards
- #32 NVIDIARTX 5050 25
- #33 NVIDIARTX 3060 12GB 24
- #34 IntelArc B570 16
- #35 NVIDIARTX 3050 6GB 16
- #36 NVIDIARTX 3050 8GB 16
- #37 IntelArc A580 13
- #38 AMDRX 7600 13
Value Ray Tracing @ 1080p
How much of that you get for today’s price.
#38 of 52 currently priced graphics cards
- #35 IntelArc A770 33
- #36 NVIDIARTX 3090 Ti 28
- #37 NVIDIARTX 3060 Ti 28
- #38 NVIDIARTX 3050 6GB 26
- #39 AMDRX 7600 25
- #40 NVIDIARTX 3090 23
- #41 NVIDIARTX 3050 8GB 23
Performance Ray Tracing @ 1440p
How much it can do. Price plays no part in this ranking.
#36 of 43 graded graphics cards
Value Ray Tracing @ 1440p
How much of that you get for today’s price.
#40 of 52 currently priced graphics cards
- #37 NVIDIARTX 3060 Ti 23
- #38 NVIDIARTX 3090 23
- #39 AMDRX 7600 21
- #40 NVIDIARTX 3050 6GB 20
- #41 NVIDIARTX 3050 8GB 18
- #42 IntelArc A380 14
- #43 AMDRX 6600 11
Performance Ray Tracing @ 4K
How much it can do. Price plays no part in this ranking.
#33 of 43 graded graphics cards
Value Ray Tracing @ 4K
How much of that you get for today’s price.
#41 of 52 currently priced graphics cards
- #38 NVIDIARTX 3060 Ti 13
- #39 AMDRX 7600 10
- #40 NVIDIARTX 3050 8GB 10
- #41 NVIDIARTX 3050 6GB 9
- #42 IntelIntel Arc Pro B70 8
- #43 IntelIntel Arc Pro B60 8
- #44 AMDRadeon AI Pro R9700 7
Performance AI
How much it can do. Price plays no part in this ranking.
#33 of 51 graded graphics cards
- #30 NVIDIARTX 5060 Ti 16GB 11
- #31 NVIDIARTX 5060 Ti 8GB 11
- #32 AMDRX 7900 GRE 11
- #33 NVIDIARTX 3050 6GB 11
- #34 NVIDIARTX 3050 8GB 11
- #35 NVIDIARTX 5060 9
- #36 AMDRX 7800 XT 9
Value AI
How much of that you get for today’s price.
#39 of 52 currently priced graphics cards
- #36 IntelArc A770 7
- #37 AMDRX 7700 XT 7
- #38 NVIDIARTX 5060 7
- #39 NVIDIARTX 3050 6GB 7
- #40 NVIDIARTX 3050 8GB 6
- #41 IntelArc A750 6
- #42 IntelArc A580 6
Performance 3D Rendering
How much it can do. Price plays no part in this ranking.
#36 of 39 graded graphics cards
- #33 NVIDIARTX 3060 12GB 14
- #34 IntelArc A750 13
- #35 IntelArc B580 12
- #36 NVIDIARTX 3050 6GB 11
- #37 NVIDIARTX 3050 8GB 11
- #38 IntelArc A580 11
- #39 IntelArc B570 9
Value 3D Rendering
How much of that you get for today’s price.
#37 of 52 currently priced graphics cards
- #34 NVIDIARTX 2000 Ada 11
- #35 IntelArc A750 10
- #36 AMDRX 7700 XT 10
- #37 NVIDIARTX 3050 6GB 10
- #38 IntelArc A580 9
- #39 NVIDIARTX 5050 8
- #40 NVIDIARTX 3050 8GB 8
Performance Light Use
How much it can do. Price plays no part in this ranking.
#3 of 50 graded graphics cards
- #1 NVIDIARTX 2000 Ada 100
- #2 NVIDIARTX PRO 2000 Blackwell 100
- #3 NVIDIARTX 3050 6GB 100
- #4 IntelArc A380 99
- #5 NVIDIAGTX 1650 99
- #6 AMDRX 6500 XT 4GB 91
- #7 NVIDIARTX 3050 8GB 89
These ladders follow the preset scenario shown above. Your own weights re-score this product, not the whole field.
What it is good for
| Scenario | this productCapability grade · Value at current price | Higher capability | Higher Value with current priorities |
|---|---|---|---|
| Balanced (all-round)Weighted all-round view | GradeNo grade Value51 | Higher capability Higher capability · Higher Value with current priorities Arc B580 90 +83% capability · +7% price | |
| 1080p GamingRaster performance · 1080p | GradeC Value56 | Higher capability Arc B580 A 93 +83% capability · +7% price | Higher Value with current priorities Arc A750 B 100 +44% capability · -32% price |
| 1440p GamingRaster performance · 1440p | GradeD Value28 | Higher capability Higher capability · Higher Value with current priorities Arc B580 B 69 +83% capability · +7% price | |
| 4K / VRRaster performance · 4K / VR | GradeF Value11 | Higher capability Higher capability · Higher Value with current priorities Arc B580 D 38 +83% capability · +7% price | |
| Ray Tracing @ 1080pRay tracing capability · 1080p | GradeF Value26 | Higher capability Higher capability · Higher Value with current priorities Arc B580 C 74 +78% capability · +7% price | |
| Ray Tracing @ 1440pRay tracing capability · 1440p | GradeF Value20 | Higher capability Higher capability · Higher Value with current priorities Arc B580 D 68 +83% capability · +7% price | |
| Ray Tracing @ 4KRay tracing capability · 4K | GradeF Value9 | — | — |
| AI / Local LLMAI compute · memory and ecosystem fit | GradeD Value7 | — | — |
| 3D Rendering3D rendering · creator workloads | GradeD Value10 | Higher capability Arc A750 D 10 ⚠ not a drop-in swap +19% capability · -32% price | — |
| Light Use & EfficiencyEfficiency · lighter workloads | GradeS Value97 | — | Higher Value with current priorities Arc A380 S 100 -1% capability · -48% price |
Balanced has no letter: it is a weighting preset, not a capability rubric. A grade answers “how well does this handle that job?” — price is never part of it. Relative Value puts the current market price back in.
Compare these grades with the full tier list
Browse shortlists for different uses
Trade-offs
Works well if
- Light Use & Efficiency is your main prioritygraded S for Light Use & Efficiency on the same rubric as the tier list
- You want memory headroom — memory is not what limits it hereno memory cap applies to this grade — the raster index sets it, not the frame buffer
- DLSS 4.5 matters to yousecond-generation transformer upscaler, but no frame generation on this generation — derived from the ampere architecture, not from a scraped feature flag
Consider other options if
- You want strong value with Balanced priorities specificallyat today's market no realistic price for this model reaches strong value with Balanced priorities — the calculation only gets there near $160, against a cheapest tracked $307
- 4K / VR is what you actually need it forit grades only F there
For the selected scenario this is not a strong fit — the grade above is the reason, and the models below suit it better.
Works well if
- 1080p is not actually your main job — Light Use & Efficiency isit grades C for 1080p, but S for Light Use & Efficiency
- Strong-value threshold: ~$216$216 is where Relative Value reaches 80 for 1080p, in the 2026-10-10–2026-10-17 offer frame
Consider other options if
- 1080p is what you actually need it forit grades C there; Arc B580 grades A at $330
- Current price sits $91 above the strong-value threshold (~$216)cheapest tracked $307 against a $216 calculated threshold for 1080p
- Value for money matters more to you than this exact modelArc A750 holds Relative Value 100 against its 56 for 1080p, at $210
For the selected scenario this is not a strong fit — the grade above is the reason, and the models below suit it better.
Works well if
- 1440p is not actually your main job — Light Use & Efficiency isit grades D for 1440p, but S for Light Use & Efficiency
Consider other options if
- 1440p is what you actually need it forit grades D there; Arc B580 grades B at $330
- You want strong value for 1440p specificallycompeting products deliver so much more for 1440p per dollar that no price this model realistically trades at reaches the strong-value mark for this job
For the selected scenario this is not a strong fit — the grade above is the reason, and the models below suit it better.
Works well if
- 4K is not actually your main job — Light Use & Efficiency isit grades F for 4K, but S for Light Use & Efficiency
Consider other options if
- 4K is what you actually need it forit grades F there; Arc B580 grades D at $330
- You want strong value for 4K specificallycompeting products deliver so much more for 4K per dollar that no price this model realistically trades at reaches the strong-value mark for this job
For the selected scenario this is not a strong fit — the grade above is the reason, and the models below suit it better.
Works well if
- Ray Tracing @ 1080p is not actually your main job — Light Use & Efficiency isit grades F for Ray Tracing @ 1080p, but S for Light Use & Efficiency
Consider other options if
- Ray Tracing @ 1080p is what you actually need it forit grades F there; Arc B580 grades C at $330
- You want strong value for Ray Tracing @ 1080p specificallycompeting products deliver so much more for Ray Tracing @ 1080p per dollar that no price this model realistically trades at reaches the strong-value mark for this job
For the selected scenario this is not a strong fit — the grade above is the reason, and the models below suit it better.
Works well if
- Ray Tracing @ 1440p is not actually your main job — Light Use & Efficiency isit grades F for Ray Tracing @ 1440p, but S for Light Use & Efficiency
Consider other options if
- Ray Tracing @ 1440p is what you actually need it forit grades F there; Arc B580 grades D at $330
- You want strong value for Ray Tracing @ 1440p specificallycompeting products deliver so much more for Ray Tracing @ 1440p per dollar that no price this model realistically trades at reaches the strong-value mark for this job
For the selected scenario this is not a strong fit — the grade above is the reason, and the models below suit it better.
Works well if
- Ray Tracing @ 4K is not actually your main job — Light Use & Efficiency isit grades F for Ray Tracing @ 4K, but S for Light Use & Efficiency
Consider other options if
- Ray Tracing @ 4K is what you actually need it forit grades F there; Arc B580 grades F at $330
- You want strong value for Ray Tracing @ 4K specificallycompeting products deliver so much more for Ray Tracing @ 4K per dollar that no price this model realistically trades at reaches the strong-value mark for this job
For the selected scenario this is not a strong fit — the grade above is the reason, and the models below suit it better.
Works well if
- AI is not actually your main job — Light Use & Efficiency isit grades D for AI, but S for Light Use & Efficiency
Consider other options if
- AI is what you actually need it forit grades D there; Arc B580 grades D at $330
- You want strong value for AI specificallycompeting products deliver so much more for AI per dollar that no price this model realistically trades at reaches the strong-value mark for this job
- You are buying for AI and want no asterisksthe rubric caps this grade: vram below useful llm floor
For the selected scenario this is not a strong fit — the grade above is the reason, and the models below suit it better.
Works well if
- 3D Rendering is not actually your main job — Light Use & Efficiency isit grades D for 3D Rendering, but S for Light Use & Efficiency
Consider other options if
- 3D Rendering is what you actually need it forit grades D there; Arc A750 grades D at $210
- You want strong value for 3D Rendering specificallycompeting products deliver so much more for 3D Rendering per dollar that no price this model realistically trades at reaches the strong-value mark for this job
Works well if
- Light Use is your main prioritygraded S for Light Use on the same rubric as the tier list
- Today's price already clears the strong-value markcheapest tracked $307 against a $398 threshold for Light Use
- You want memory headroom — memory is not what limits it hereno memory cap applies to this grade for Light Use — the raster index sets it, not the frame buffer
Consider other options if
- Value for money matters more to you than this exact modelArc A380 holds Relative Value 100 against its 97 for Light Use, at $160
- 4K / VR is what you actually need it forit grades only F there
Every line states the fact it was derived from, for the scenario selected above. Thresholds are calculated points on our value curve — information about where the maths turns, not instructions about what to pay.
Similar options to the RTX 3050 6GB
Chosen for Balanced
Chosen for 1080p
Chosen for 1440p
Chosen for 4K
Chosen for Ray Tracing @ 1080p
Chosen for Ray Tracing @ 1440p
Chosen for Ray Tracing @ 4K
Chosen for AI
This scenario carries a requirement candidates are checked against first: CUDA — Many local-LLM and diffusion toolchains are CUDA-only. ROCm and Vulkan builds exist and work, but they are not drop-in — check your toolchain before treating a non-NVIDIA card as an equivalent swap.
Chosen for 3D Rendering
This scenario carries a requirement candidates are checked against first: OptiX — Blender Cycles reaches its fastest path on NVIDIA OptiX. HIP (AMD) and oneAPI (Intel) render the same scenes, so this is a workflow question, not a capability wall — but render times and add-on support differ.
Chosen for Light Use
Alternatives stay near this product’s price range. Step-up options may exceed the standard budget envelope when the capability gain is meaningful.
More head-to-head comparisons in this category
Upgrade planner
Judge the change in the active scenario, then make the cash gap explicit.
Using page scenarioWhat are you upgrading from? These are the axes we compare on, and where this product stands in the current market.
We rank upgrades by out-of-pocket cost — the new price minus what yours is worth — not by sticker price.
Only candidates that clear the configured meaningful-upgrade gate will be shown; roles are omitted rather than filled.
Capability differences are expressed as tiers and index points, not as benchmark percentages we did not measure.
Specifications and compatibility
What this product is, and what to check before it goes into your build.
Core / Performance
- Architecture
- Ampere
- GPU chip
- GA107
- GPU variant
- GA107-325-K2-A1
- Process node
- 8 nm
- Transistors
- 8,700 million
- Shading units
- 2304
Memory
- Capacity
- 6 GB
- Type
- GDDR6
- Bus width
- 96 bit
- Effective speed
- 14 Gbps
- Bandwidth
- 168 GB/s
Power / Interface
- Board power (TBP)
- 70 W
- Power connector
- Varies by version
- Recommended PSU
- Varies by version
- Bus interface
- PCIe 4.0 x8
Physical / Outputs
- Length
- Varies by version181–201 mm across tracked variants
- Height
- Varies by version69–120 mm across tracked variants
- Width
- Varies by version
- Slot thickness
- Varies by version2 across tracked variants
- Fans
- Varies by version2 across tracked variants
- Cooling
- Varies by version
- Outputs
- Varies by version
Power / Interface
- Board power (TBP)
- 70 W
- Power connector
- None — powered by the PCIe slot
- Recommended PSU
- 250 W
- Bus interface
- PCIe 4.0 x8
Physical / Outputs
- Length
- 201 mm
- Height
- 120 mm
- Width
- Unknown
- Slot thickness
- 2 slots
- Fans
- 2
- Cooling
- Air
- Outputs
- 1× DisplayPort · 1× HDMI
Exact board / Identity
- Board part number
- DUAL-RTX3050-6G
- Vendor warranty
- 3 years
Power / Interface
- Board power (TBP)
- 70 W
- Power connector
- None — powered by the PCIe slot
- Recommended PSU
- 250 W
- Bus interface
- PCIe 4.0 x8
Physical / Outputs
- Length
- 201 mm
- Height
- 120 mm
- Width
- Unknown
- Slot thickness
- 2 slots
- Fans
- 2
- Cooling
- Air
- Outputs
- 1× DisplayPort · 1× HDMI
Exact board / Identity
- Board part number
- DUAL-RTX3050-O6G
- Vendor warranty
- 3 years
Power / Interface
- Board power (TBP)
- 70 W
- Power connector
- None — powered by the PCIe slot
- Recommended PSU
- 250 W
- Bus interface
- PCIe 4.0 x8
Physical / Outputs
- Length
- 181 mm
- Height
- 69 mm
- Width
- Unknown
- Slot thickness
- 2 slots
- Fans
- 2
- Cooling
- Air
- Outputs
- 2× DisplayPort · 2× HDMI
Exact board / Identity
- Board part number
- GV-N3050OC-6GL
- Vendor warranty
- 3 years
Select an exact version for physical dimensions and connector details.
Show all specifications
Core / Performance
- Texture units
- 72
- ROPs
- 32
- Ray tracing cores
- 18
- Tensor cores
- 72
- Base clock
- 1042 MHz
- Boost clock
- 1507 MHz
Features
- Upscaling
- DLSS 4.5
- Ray tracing
- Supported
- RGB lighting
- No
Warranty & release
- Release year
- 2024
Hover any value to see where it came from: a manufacturer specification, or a figure The Comparator calculated.
Sources: Comparator offer frame 2026-10-10–2026-10-17
What to check in your build
Varies by version
The exact requirement depends on the version you select.
Varies by version
The exact requirement depends on the version you select.
Varies by version
Slot occupancy depends on the board cooler and thickness.
Select an exact version above for physical dimensions and connector details.
250 W PSU recommended
Whole-system figure from the board vendor — it already allows for the processor and transient spikes.
Needs at least 201 mm of GPU clearance
Front radiators and fans eat into the figure a case advertises.
Occupies 2 slots
The cooler covers the slots below it — check nothing adjacent needs that space.
250 W PSU recommended
Whole-system figure from the board vendor — it already allows for the processor and transient spikes.
Needs at least 201 mm of GPU clearance
Front radiators and fans eat into the figure a case advertises.
Occupies 2 slots
The cooler covers the slots below it — check nothing adjacent needs that space.
250 W PSU recommended
Whole-system figure from the board vendor — it already allows for the processor and transient spikes.
Needs at least 181 mm of GPU clearance
Front radiators and fans eat into the figure a case advertises.
Occupies 2 slots
The cooler covers the slots below it — check nothing adjacent needs that space.
Compare all 3 board variants
| Variant | Length | Slot thickness | Power connector | Recommended PSU |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ASUS DUAL RTX 3050 6 GB | 201 mm | 2 | None — powered by the PCIe slot | 250 W |
| ASUS DUAL RTX 3050 OC 6 GB | 201 mm | 2 | None — powered by the PCIe slot | 250 W |
| GIGABYTE RTX 3050 OC Low Profile 6 GB | 181 mm | 2 | None — powered by the PCIe slot | 250 W |
Found an error? Report this specification Email the field, corrected value and an optional source.
Compatibility guidance is practical help, not a score. Missing data is shown as unknown, never invented.
Summary
RTX 3050 6GB offers a balanced view across an all-round mix of priorities. It ranks #47 by capability in the current modelled field. Its clearest measured strength is raster index 360. Arc A750 currently clears the same practical bar with stronger Relative Value.
RTX 3050 6GB offers C-grade capability for 1080p. It ranks #47 by capability in the current modelled field. Its clearest measured strength is raster index 360. The C grade is the decisive limitation for this workload.
RTX 3050 6GB offers D-grade capability for 1440p. It ranks #47 by capability in the current modelled field. Its clearest measured strength is raster index 360. The D grade is the decisive limitation for this workload.
RTX 3050 6GB offers F-grade capability for 4K. It ranks #47 by capability in the current modelled field. Its clearest measured strength is raster index 360. The F grade is the decisive limitation for this workload.
RTX 3050 6GB offers F-grade capability for Ray Tracing @ 1080p. It ranks #35 by capability in the current modelled field. Its clearest measured strength is ray-tracing index 263. The F grade is the decisive limitation for this workload.
RTX 3050 6GB offers F-grade capability for Ray Tracing @ 1440p. It ranks #36 by capability in the current modelled field. Its clearest measured strength is ray-tracing index 263. The F grade is the decisive limitation for this workload.
RTX 3050 6GB offers F-grade capability for Ray Tracing @ 4K. It ranks #33 by capability in the current modelled field. Its clearest measured strength is ray-tracing index 263. The F grade is the decisive limitation for this workload.
RTX 3050 6GB offers D-grade capability for AI. It ranks #33 by capability in the current modelled field. Its clearest measured strength is ai compute index 378. The D grade is the decisive limitation for this workload.
RTX 3050 6GB offers D-grade capability for 3D Rendering. It ranks #36 by capability in the current modelled field. Its clearest measured strength is raster index 360. The D grade is the decisive limitation for this workload.
RTX 3050 6GB offers S-grade capability for Light Use. It ranks #3 by capability in the current modelled field. Its clearest measured strength is raster index 360. Arc A380 currently clears the same practical bar with stronger Relative Value.
FAQ
Do all RTX 3050 6GB boards have the same physical design?
No. Dimensions, slot thickness, cooling, power connectors and display outputs belong to the exact board. Use the Exact version selector before checking case or PSU fit.
How much case clearance should I allow for the RTX 3050 6GB?
Tracked boards range from 181 to 201 mm in length. Select the exact board, then also allow for front radiators or fans, card height, slot thickness and power-cable bend; length alone does not guarantee fit.
Why does Relative Value change when I choose another scenario?
Each scenario changes the weights applied to capability, price and the other published factors. The hardware facts stay fixed, but the value question changes, so its score and rank can change too.
Why can Amazon appear without a tracked price?
Amazon is shown as a discovery link when we do not have a permitted verified price snapshot. It is excluded from price comparisons, rankings and Relative Value until a compliant tracked price exists.
Useful links & sources
offer frame 2026-10-10–2026-10-17 · formula gpu-value-v1.4 · facts facts-2026-10-17 · Relative Value is an estimate from our current dataset, the selected weights and dated market prices — not an official product rating and not a price forecast. Target prices are calculation thresholds, not predictions. Methodology We are not a shop. Affiliate links may earn us a commission; they never change the calculations or the ranking.