Retailer photo of ASRock Arc A750 Challenger D OC. View this offer in Where to buy
Intel · GPU · Arc A
Arc A750
The current Arc A750 price from retailers, its key specifications, and how it performs for each job.
Trade-offs: 4K / VR is what you actually need it for
- VRAM
- 8 GB
- Memory bandwidth
- 512 GB/s
- Board power
- 225 W
- Architecture
- Xe-HPG
- Interface
- PCIe 4.0 x16
Move a slider and the page re-scores this product against the same market frame.
What does it cost today, and is that a good price?
Market confidence: MediumAt $210 the Arc A750 is priced 29% below its $295 representative market level. Only 2 verified new offers stand behind it, so the level can move quickly.
Price looks competitive: the cheapest verified offer is 29% below the current representative level.
Prices & availability
Arc A750: current price and offers
Compare the offers we track for this model, across variants and retailers.
2 tracked offers · 2 retailers
| Variant | Store | Condition | Price (snapshot) | Value · Balanced | Checked | Offer link |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ASRock Arc A750 Challenger D OC | Newegg | New | $210 | 82 | 2026-10-16 | View offer → |
| SPARKLE Arc A750 TITAN OC | MemoryC | New | $379 | 54 | 2026-10-11 | View offer → |
| Arc A750Multiple variants available | Amazon Affiliate | Varies | Find on Amazon | Not tracked | No price snapshot | Find on Amazon → |
Prices are dated snapshots, not live quotes — confirm the final price at the store. New, refurbished and used offers are listed separately; used offers carry warranty and seller risk.
Performance and where it ranks
Two different questions, side by side. Performance compares what the hardware can do; Value compares what that capability costs at today’s price. A product can rank high on one and low on the other — that gap is the point.
Performance Balanced
How much it can do. Price plays no part in this ranking.
#41 of 51 graded graphics cards
- #38 NVIDIARTX 5050 23
- #39 IntelArc A770 22
- #40 NVIDIARTX 2000 Ada 22
- #41 IntelArc A750 22
- #42 NVIDIARTX 3060 12GB 22
- #43 IntelArc B570 22
- #44 AMDRX 7600 21
Value Balanced
How much of that you get for today’s price.
#7 of 52 currently priced graphics cards
- #4 AMDRX 9070 GRE 92
- #5 IntelArc B580 90
- #6 AMDRX 9060 XT 8GB 85
- #7 IntelArc A750 82
- #8 IntelArc B570 81
- #9 NVIDIARTX 5070 81
- #10 NVIDIARTX 5060 Ti 8GB 80
Performance 1080p
How much it can do. Price plays no part in this ranking.
#41 of 51 graded graphics cards
- #38 NVIDIARTX 5050 23
- #39 IntelArc A770 22
- #40 NVIDIARTX 2000 Ada 22
- #41 IntelArc A750 22
- #42 NVIDIARTX 3060 12GB 22
- #43 IntelArc B570 22
- #44 AMDRX 7600 21
Value 1080p
How much of that you get for today’s price.
#1 of 52 currently priced graphics cards
- #1 IntelArc A750 100
- #2 IntelArc B580 93
- #3 IntelArc A580 93
- #4 AMDRX 9060 XT 16GB 92
- #5 AMDRX 9060 XT 8GB 88
- #6 IntelArc B570 87
- #7 AMDRX 9070 GRE 86
Performance 1440p
How much it can do. Price plays no part in this ranking.
#41 of 51 graded graphics cards
- #38 NVIDIARTX 5050 23
- #39 IntelArc A770 22
- #40 NVIDIARTX 2000 Ada 22
- #41 IntelArc A750 22
- #42 NVIDIARTX 3060 12GB 22
- #43 IntelArc B570 22
- #44 AMDRX 7600 21
Value 1440p
How much of that you get for today’s price.
#22 of 52 currently priced graphics cards
- #19 IntelArc B570 57
- #20 NVIDIARTX 5060 Ti 16GB 56
- #21 NVIDIARTX 4070 Ti 56
- #22 IntelArc A750 55
- #23 NVIDIARTX 4080 55
- #24 NVIDIARTX 5090 53
- #25 AMDRX 7700 XT 53
Performance 4K
How much it can do. Price plays no part in this ranking.
#41 of 51 graded graphics cards
- #38 NVIDIARTX 5050 23
- #39 IntelArc A770 22
- #40 NVIDIARTX 2000 Ada 22
- #41 IntelArc A750 22
- #42 NVIDIARTX 3060 12GB 22
- #43 IntelArc B570 22
- #44 AMDRX 7600 21
Value 4K
How much of that you get for today’s price.
#37 of 52 currently priced graphics cards
- #34 NVIDIARTX 5050 24
- #35 NVIDIARTX 3070 Ti 23
- #36 IntelIntel Arc Pro B60 23
- #37 IntelArc A750 23
- #38 IntelArc A770 21
- #39 NVIDIARTX PRO 2000 Blackwell 20
- #40 NVIDIARTX 4060 20
Performance Ray Tracing @ 1440p
How much it can do. Price plays no part in this ranking.
#38 of 43 graded graphics cards
- #35 IntelArc B570 13
- #36 NVIDIARTX 3050 6GB 13
- #37 NVIDIARTX 3050 8GB 13
- #38 IntelArc A750 12
- #39 IntelArc A580 10
- #40 AMDRX 7600 9
- #41 AMDRX 6600 8
Value Ray Tracing @ 1440p
How much of that you get for today’s price.
#25 of 52 currently priced graphics cards
- #22 AMDRX 7800 XT 51
- #23 AMDRX 7700 XT 47
- #24 AMDRX 9060 XT 8GB 46
- #25 IntelArc A750 44
- #26 NVIDIARTX 5050 44
- #27 AMDRX 7900 GRE 43
- #28 NVIDIARTX 4090 42
Performance Ray Tracing @ 4K
How much it can do. Price plays no part in this ranking.
#40 of 43 graded graphics cards
Value Ray Tracing @ 4K
How much of that you get for today’s price.
#34 of 52 currently priced graphics cards
- #31 IntelArc A770 21
- #32 NVIDIARTX 4060 Ti 8GB 21
- #33 NVIDIARTX 3060 12GB 20
- #34 IntelArc A750 19
- #35 NVIDIARTX 3070 Ti 18
- #36 IntelArc A580 17
- #37 NVIDIARTX 4060 16
Performance AI
How much it can do. Price plays no part in this ranking.
#39 of 51 graded graphics cards
- #36 AMDRX 7800 XT 9
- #37 AMDRX 7700 XT 8
- #38 IntelArc A770 7
- #39 IntelArc A750 7
- #40 NVIDIARTX 4060 7
- #41 NVIDIARTX 5050 6
- #42 IntelArc A580 6
Value AI
How much of that you get for today’s price.
#41 of 52 currently priced graphics cards
- #38 NVIDIARTX 5060 7
- #39 NVIDIARTX 3050 6GB 7
- #40 NVIDIARTX 3050 8GB 6
- #41 IntelArc A750 6
- #42 IntelArc A580 6
- #43 IntelIntel Arc Pro B60 5
- #44 NVIDIARTX 5050 5
Performance 3D Rendering
How much it can do. Price plays no part in this ranking.
#34 of 39 graded graphics cards
- #31 AMDRX 7700 XT 15
- #32 IntelArc A770 14
- #33 NVIDIARTX 3060 12GB 14
- #34 IntelArc A750 13
- #35 IntelArc B580 12
- #36 NVIDIARTX 3050 6GB 11
- #37 NVIDIARTX 3050 8GB 11
Value 3D Rendering
How much of that you get for today’s price.
#35 of 52 currently priced graphics cards
- #32 AMDRX 7900 GRE 12
- #33 NVIDIARTX 5060 12
- #34 NVIDIARTX 2000 Ada 11
- #35 IntelArc A750 10
- #36 AMDRX 7700 XT 10
- #37 NVIDIARTX 3050 6GB 10
- #38 IntelArc A580 9
Performance Light Use
How much it can do. Price plays no part in this ranking.
#29 of 50 graded graphics cards
- #26 AMDRX 9070 GRE 65
- #27 AMDRX 9070 63
- #28 NVIDIARTX 4070 Super 63
- #29 IntelArc A750 62
- #30 IntelArc A770 62
- #31 AMDRX 7700 XT 57
- #32 IntelIntel Arc Pro B70 56
Value Light Use
How much of that you get for today’s price.
#15 of 52 currently priced graphics cards
- #12 AMDRX 7600 42
- #13 NVIDIARTX 4060 41
- #14 NVIDIARTX 5060 Ti 8GB 41
- #15 IntelArc A750 41
- #16 NVIDIAGTX 1650 37
- #17 NVIDIARTX PRO 2000 Blackwell 36
- #18 AMDRX 9070 GRE 34
These ladders follow the preset scenario shown above. Your own weights re-score this product, not the whole field.
What it is good for
| Scenario | this productCapability grade · Value at current price | Higher capability |
|---|---|---|
| Balanced (all-round)Weighted all-round view | GradeNo grade Value82 | — |
| 1080p GamingRaster performance · 1080p | GradeB Value100 | — |
| 1440p GamingRaster performance · 1440p | GradeC Value55 | — |
| 4K / VRRaster performance · 4K / VR | GradeF Value23 | — |
| Ray Tracing @ 1440pRay tracing capability · 1440p | GradeF Value44 | — |
| Ray Tracing @ 4KRay tracing capability · 4K | GradeF Value19 | — |
| AI / Local LLMAI compute · memory and ecosystem fit | GradeC Value6 | — |
| 3D Rendering3D rendering · creator workloads | GradeD Value10 | — |
| Light Use & EfficiencyEfficiency · lighter workloads | GradeC Value41 | Higher capability Higher capability · Higher Value with current priorities Arc A380 S 100 +59% capability · -24% price |
Balanced has no letter: it is a weighting preset, not a capability rubric. A grade answers “how well does this handle that job?” — price is never part of it. Relative Value puts the current market price back in.
Compare these grades with the full tier list
Browse shortlists for different uses
Trade-offs
Works well if
- 1080p Gaming is your main prioritygraded B for 1080p Gaming on the same rubric as the tier list
- Today's price already clears the strong-value markcheapest tracked $210 against a $218 threshold with Balanced priorities
- You want memory headroom — memory is not what limits it hereno memory cap applies to this grade — the raster index sets it, not the frame buffer
Consider other options if
- 4K / VR is what you actually need it forit grades only F there
Works well if
- 1080p is your main priority — B here means solid 60 fps at high settingsgraded B for 1080p on the same rubric as the tier list
- Today's price already clears the strong-value markcheapest tracked $210 against a $262 threshold for 1080p
- You want memory headroom — memory is not what limits it hereno memory cap applies to this grade for 1080p — the raster index sets it, not the frame buffer
Consider other options if
- 4K / VR is what you actually need it forit grades only F there
For the selected scenario this is not a strong fit — the grade above is the reason, and the models below suit it better.
Works well if
- 1440p is not actually your main job — 1080p Gaming isit grades C for 1440p, but B for 1080p Gaming
Consider other options if
- 1440p is what you actually need it forit grades only C there
- You want strong value for 1440p specificallyat today's market no realistic price for this model reaches strong value for 1440p — the calculation only gets there near $127, against a cheapest tracked $210
For the selected scenario this is not a strong fit — the grade above is the reason, and the models below suit it better.
Works well if
- 4K is not actually your main job — 1080p Gaming isit grades F for 4K, but B for 1080p Gaming
Consider other options if
- 4K is what you actually need it forit grades only F there
- You want strong value for 4K specificallycompeting products deliver so much more for 4K per dollar that no price this model realistically trades at reaches the strong-value mark for this job
For the selected scenario this is not a strong fit — the grade above is the reason, and the models below suit it better.
Works well if
- Ray Tracing @ 1440p is not actually your main job — 1080p Gaming isit grades F for Ray Tracing @ 1440p, but B for 1080p Gaming
Consider other options if
- Ray Tracing @ 1440p is what you actually need it forit grades only F there
- You want strong value for Ray Tracing @ 1440p specificallyat today's market no realistic price for this model reaches strong value for Ray Tracing @ 1440p — the calculation only gets there near $90, against a cheapest tracked $210
- You are buying for Ray Tracing @ 1440p and want no asterisksthe rubric caps this grade: fps estimated (low confidence), not measured
For the selected scenario this is not a strong fit — the grade above is the reason, and the models below suit it better.
Works well if
- Ray Tracing @ 4K is not actually your main job — 1080p Gaming isit grades F for Ray Tracing @ 4K, but B for 1080p Gaming
Consider other options if
- Ray Tracing @ 4K is what you actually need it forit grades only F there
- You want strong value for Ray Tracing @ 4K specificallycompeting products deliver so much more for Ray Tracing @ 4K per dollar that no price this model realistically trades at reaches the strong-value mark for this job
- You are buying for Ray Tracing @ 4K and want no asterisksthe rubric caps this grade: fps estimated (low confidence), not measured
For the selected scenario this is not a strong fit — the grade above is the reason, and the models below suit it better.
Works well if
- AI is not actually your main job — 1080p Gaming isit grades C for AI, but B for 1080p Gaming
Consider other options if
- AI is what you actually need it forit grades only C there
- You want strong value for AI specificallycompeting products deliver so much more for AI per dollar that no price this model realistically trades at reaches the strong-value mark for this job
For the selected scenario this is not a strong fit — the grade above is the reason, and the models below suit it better.
Works well if
- 3D Rendering is not actually your main job — 1080p Gaming isit grades D for 3D Rendering, but B for 1080p Gaming
Consider other options if
- 3D Rendering is what you actually need it forit grades only D there
- You want strong value for 3D Rendering specificallycompeting products deliver so much more for 3D Rendering per dollar that no price this model realistically trades at reaches the strong-value mark for this job
For the selected scenario this is not a strong fit — the grade above is the reason, and the models below suit it better.
Works well if
- Light Use is not actually your main job — 1080p Gaming isit grades C for Light Use, but B for 1080p Gaming
Consider other options if
- Light Use is what you actually need it forit grades C there; Arc A380 grades S at $160
- You want strong value for Light Use specificallyat today's market no realistic price for this model reaches strong value for Light Use — the calculation only gets there near $86, against a cheapest tracked $210
- Value for money matters more to you than this exact modelArc A380 holds Relative Value 100 against its 41 for Light Use, at $160
Every line states the fact it was derived from, for the scenario selected above. Thresholds are calculated points on our value curve — information about where the maths turns, not instructions about what to pay.
Similar options to the Arc A750
Chosen for Ray Tracing @ 4K
Chosen for Light Use
More head-to-head comparisons in this category
Upgrade planner
Judge the change in the active scenario, then make the cash gap explicit.
Using page scenarioWhat are you upgrading from? These are the axes we compare on, and where this product stands in the current market.
We rank upgrades by out-of-pocket cost — the new price minus what yours is worth — not by sticker price.
Only candidates that clear the configured meaningful-upgrade gate will be shown; roles are omitted rather than filled.
Capability differences are expressed as tiers and index points, not as benchmark percentages we did not measure.
Specifications and compatibility
What this product is, and what to check before it goes into your build.
Core / Performance
- Architecture
- Xe-HPG
- GPU chip
- DG2-512
- GPU variant
- ACM-G10
- Process node
- 6 nm
- Transistors
- 21,700 million
- Shading units
- 3584
Memory
- Capacity
- 8 GB
- Type
- GDDR6
- Bus width
- 256 bit
- Effective speed
- 16 Gbps
- Bandwidth
- 512 GB/s
Power / Interface
- Board power (TBP)
- 225 W
- Power connector
- Varies by version
- Recommended PSU
- Varies by version
- Bus interface
- PCIe 4.0 x16
Physical / Outputs
- Length
- Varies by version271–306 mm across tracked variants
- Height
- Varies by version103–132 mm across tracked variants
- Width
- Varies by version
- Slot thickness
- Varies by version2–3 across tracked variants
- Fans
- Varies by version2–3 across tracked variants
- Cooling
- Varies by version
- Outputs
- Varies by version
Power / Interface
- Board power (TBP)
- 225 W
- Power connector
- 2x 8-pin
- Recommended PSU
- 550 W
- Bus interface
- PCIe 4.0 x16
Physical / Outputs
- Length
- 271 mm
- Height
- 132 mm
- Width
- Unknown
- Slot thickness
- 2 slots
- Fans
- 2
- Cooling
- Air
- Outputs
- 3× DisplayPort · 1× HDMI
Exact board / Identity
- Board part number
- A750 CLD 8GO
- Vendor warranty
- 2 years
Power / Interface
- Board power (TBP)
- 225 W
- Power connector
- 2x 8-pin
- Recommended PSU
- 550 W
- Bus interface
- PCIe 4.0 x16
Physical / Outputs
- Length
- 306 mm
- Height
- 103 mm
- Width
- Unknown
- Slot thickness
- 3 slots
- Fans
- 3
- Cooling
- Air
- Outputs
- 3× DisplayPort · 1× HDMI
Exact board / Identity
- Board part number
- SA750T-8GOC
- Vendor warranty
- 2 years
Select an exact version for physical dimensions and connector details.
Show all specifications
Core / Performance
- Texture units
- 224
- ROPs
- 112
- Ray tracing cores
- 28
- Tensor cores
- 0
- Base clock
- 2200 MHz
- Boost clock
- 2400 MHz
Features
- Upscaling
- XeSS
- Ray tracing
- Supported
- RGB lighting
- No
Warranty & release
- Release year
- 2022
Hover any value to see where it came from: a manufacturer specification, or a figure The Comparator calculated.
Sources: Comparator offer frame 2026-10-10–2026-10-17
What to check in your build
Varies by version
The exact requirement depends on the version you select.
Varies by version
Select a board to confirm its connector and cable-clearance needs.
Varies by version
The exact requirement depends on the version you select.
Varies by version
The exact requirement depends on the version you select.
Varies by version
Slot occupancy depends on the board cooler and thickness.
Select an exact version above for physical dimensions and connector details.
550 W PSU recommended
Whole-system figure from the board vendor — it already allows for the processor and transient spikes.
2x 8-pin required
Adapters work but add connector bulk and need extra cable-bend clearance.
Needs at least 271 mm of GPU clearance
Front radiators and fans eat into the figure a case advertises.
Leave room beyond the card for the cable bend
No verified minimum is published — measure it.
Occupies 2 slots
The cooler covers the slots below it — check nothing adjacent needs that space.
550 W PSU recommended
Whole-system figure from the board vendor — it already allows for the processor and transient spikes.
2x 8-pin required
Adapters work but add connector bulk and need extra cable-bend clearance.
Needs at least 306 mm of GPU clearance
Front radiators and fans eat into the figure a case advertises.
Leave room beyond the card for the cable bend
No verified minimum is published — measure it.
Occupies 3 slots
The cooler covers the slots below it — check nothing adjacent needs that space.
Compare all 2 board variants
| Variant | Length | Slot thickness | Power connector | Recommended PSU |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ASRock Arc A750 Challenger D OC | 271 mm | 2 | 2x 8-pin | 550 W |
| SPARKLE Arc A750 TITAN OC | 306 mm | 3 | 2x 8-pin | 550 W |
Found an error? Report this specification Email the field, corrected value and an optional source.
Compatibility guidance is practical help, not a score. Missing data is shown as unknown, never invented.
Summary
Arc A750 offers a balanced view across an all-round mix of priorities. It ranks #41 by capability in the current modelled field. Its clearest measured strength is raster index 520. The main limitation appears when 4K / VR becomes the priority, where it grades F.
Arc A750 offers B-grade capability for 1080p. It ranks #41 by capability in the current modelled field. Its clearest measured strength is raster index 520. The main limitation appears when 4K / VR becomes the priority, where it grades F.
Arc A750 offers C-grade capability for 1440p. It ranks #41 by capability in the current modelled field. Its clearest measured strength is raster index 520. The C grade is the decisive limitation for this workload.
Arc A750 offers F-grade capability for 4K. It ranks #41 by capability in the current modelled field. Its clearest measured strength is raster index 520. The F grade is the decisive limitation for this workload.
Arc A750 offers F-grade capability for Ray Tracing @ 1440p. It ranks #38 by capability in the current modelled field. Its clearest measured strength is ray-tracing index 446. The F grade is the decisive limitation for this workload.
Arc A750 offers F-grade capability for Ray Tracing @ 4K. It ranks #40 by capability in the current modelled field. Its clearest measured strength is ray-tracing index 446. The F grade is the decisive limitation for this workload.
Arc A750 offers C-grade capability for AI. It ranks #39 by capability in the current modelled field. Its clearest measured strength is ai compute index 260. The C grade is the decisive limitation for this workload.
Arc A750 offers D-grade capability for 3D Rendering. It ranks #34 by capability in the current modelled field. Its clearest measured strength is raster index 520. The D grade is the decisive limitation for this workload.
Arc A750 offers C-grade capability for Light Use. It ranks #29 by capability in the current modelled field. Its clearest measured strength is raster index 520. The C grade is the decisive limitation for this workload.
FAQ
Do all Arc A750 boards have the same physical design?
No. Dimensions, slot thickness, cooling, power connectors and display outputs belong to the exact board. Use the Exact version selector before checking case or PSU fit.
How much case clearance should I allow for the Arc A750?
Tracked boards range from 271 to 306 mm in length. Select the exact board, then also allow for front radiators or fans, card height, slot thickness and power-cable bend; length alone does not guarantee fit.
Why does Relative Value change when I choose another scenario?
Each scenario changes the weights applied to capability, price and the other published factors. The hardware facts stay fixed, but the value question changes, so its score and rank can change too.
Why can Amazon appear without a tracked price?
Amazon is shown as a discovery link when we do not have a permitted verified price snapshot. It is excluded from price comparisons, rankings and Relative Value until a compliant tracked price exists.
Useful links & sources
offer frame 2026-10-10–2026-10-17 · formula gpu-value-v1.4 · facts facts-2026-10-17 · Relative Value is an estimate from our current dataset, the selected weights and dated market prices — not an official product rating and not a price forecast. Target prices are calculation thresholds, not predictions. Methodology We are not a shop. Affiliate links may earn us a commission; they never change the calculations or the ranking.