RX 9070 XT
The current RX 9070 XT price from retailers, its key specifications, and how it performs for each job.
AMD · GPU · RX 9000
Retailer photo of PowerColor Hellhound Reva RX 9070 XT. View this offer in Where to buy
Works well for: 1080p Gaming, 1440p Gaming, 4K / VR
Trade-offs: Not the pick if Light Use & Efficiency is your main use
- VRAM
- 16 GB
- Memory bandwidth
- 643 GB/s
- Board power
- 304 W
- Architecture
- RDNA 4.0
- Interface
- PCIe 5.0 x16
Move a slider and the page re-scores this product against the same market frame.
What does it cost today, and is that a good price?
Market confidence: MediumAt CAD 1100 the RX 9070 XT is priced 18% below its CAD 1335 representative market level. Nothing in the current frame clears the same bar for less.
Price looks competitive: the cheapest verified offer is 18% below the current representative level.
Prices & availability
RX 9070 XT: current price and offers
Compare the offers we track for this model, across variants and retailers.
8 tracked offers · 2 retailers
| Variant | Store | Condition | Price (snapshot) | Value · Balanced | Checked | Offer link |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PowerColor Hellhound Reva RX 9070 XT | Newegg | New | CAD 1,100 | 100 | 2026-10-29 | View offer → |
| PowerColor Red Devil RX 9070 XT | Newegg | New | CAD 1,170 | 96 | 2026-10-29 | View offer → |
| PowerColor Reaper RX 9070 XT | Amazon | New | Check on Amazon | 86 | 2026-10-29 | View offer → |
| GIGABYTE RX 9070 XT GAMING OC | Newegg | New | CAD 1,500 | 80 | 2026-10-29 | View offer → |
| Sapphire NITRO+ Radeon RX 9070 XT PhantomLink 16GB | Amazon | New | Check on Amazon | 75 | 2026-10-29 | View offer → |
| RX 9070 XTMultiple variants available | Amazon Affiliate | Varies | Find on Amazon | Not tracked | No price snapshot | Find on Amazon → |
Prices are dated snapshots, not live quotes — confirm the final price at the store. New, refurbished and used offers are listed separately; used offers carry warranty and seller risk.
Show the other 3 tracked offers
| Variant | Store | Condition | Price (snapshot) | Value · Balanced | Checked | Offer link |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sapphire METAL Alloy Pulse RX 9070 XT | Newegg | New | CAD 2,100 | 64 | 2026-10-29 | View offer → |
| PowerColor Hellhound Reva RX 9070 XT | Newegg | Refurbished | CAD 927 | 100 | 2026-10-29 | View offer → |
| Gigabyte Radeon RX 9070 XT GAMING OC ICE 16GB | Newegg | Refurbished | CAD 950 | 100 | 2026-10-29 | View offer → |
Performance and where it ranks
Two different questions, side by side. Performance compares what the hardware can do; Value compares what that capability costs at today’s price. A product can rank high on one and low on the other — that gap is the point.
Performance Balanced
How much it can do. Price plays no part in this ranking.
#8 of 40 graded graphics cards
- #5 NVIDIARTX PRO 4000 Blackwell 67
- #6 NVIDIARTX 4080 Super 62
- #7 NVIDIARTX 4080 61
- #8 AMDRX 9070 XT 60
- #9 NVIDIARTX 5070 Ti 59
- #10 AMDRX 7900 XT 57
- #11 NVIDIARTX 4070 Ti Super 57
Value Balanced
How much of that you get for today’s price.
#1 of 41 currently priced graphics cards
- #1 AMDRX 9070 XT 100
- #2 AMDRX 9060 XT 16GB 97
- #3 AMDRX 9070 GRE 95
- #4 AMDRX 9070 94
- #5 AMDRX 9060 XT 8GB 85
- #6 NVIDIARTX 4070 Ti Super 84
- #7 NVIDIARTX 4070 Super 83
Performance 1080p
How much it can do. Price plays no part in this ranking.
#8 of 40 graded graphics cards
- #5 NVIDIARTX PRO 4000 Blackwell 67
- #6 NVIDIARTX 4080 Super 62
- #7 NVIDIARTX 4080 61
- #8 AMDRX 9070 XT 60
- #9 NVIDIARTX 5070 Ti 59
- #10 AMDRX 7900 XT 57
- #11 NVIDIARTX 4070 Ti Super 57
Value 1080p
How much of that you get for today’s price.
#4 of 41 currently priced graphics cards
- #1 AMDRX 9060 XT 16GB 100
- #2 AMDRX 9070 GRE 100
- #3 AMDRX 9060 XT 8GB 97
- #4 AMDRX 9070 XT 93
- #5 AMDRX 9070 89
- #6 NVIDIARTX 5060 Ti 8GB 81
- #7 NVIDIARTX 5060 80
Performance 1440p
How much it can do. Price plays no part in this ranking.
#8 of 40 graded graphics cards
- #5 NVIDIARTX PRO 4000 Blackwell 67
- #6 NVIDIARTX 4080 Super 62
- #7 NVIDIARTX 4080 61
- #8 AMDRX 9070 XT 60
- #9 NVIDIARTX 5070 Ti 59
- #10 AMDRX 7900 XT 57
- #11 NVIDIARTX 4070 Ti Super 57
Value 1440p
How much of that you get for today’s price.
#1 of 41 currently priced graphics cards
- #1 AMDRX 9070 XT 100
- #2 AMDRX 9070 89
- #3 AMDRX 9060 XT 16GB 83
- #4 AMDRX 9070 GRE 83
- #5 NVIDIARTX 4070 Ti Super 81
- #6 NVIDIARTX 4080 Super 76
- #7 NVIDIARTX 4090 75
Performance 4K
How much it can do. Price plays no part in this ranking.
#8 of 40 graded graphics cards
- #5 NVIDIARTX PRO 4000 Blackwell 67
- #6 NVIDIARTX 4080 Super 62
- #7 NVIDIARTX 4080 61
- #8 AMDRX 9070 XT 60
- #9 NVIDIARTX 5070 Ti 59
- #10 AMDRX 7900 XT 57
- #11 NVIDIARTX 4070 Ti Super 57
Value 4K
How much of that you get for today’s price.
#3 of 41 currently priced graphics cards
- #1 NVIDIARTX 5090 100
- #2 NVIDIARTX 4090 82
- #3 AMDRX 9070 XT 77
- #4 NVIDIARTX 5080 71
- #5 NVIDIARTX 4080 Super 66
- #6 NVIDIARTX 5070 Ti 64
- #7 AMDRX 9070 64
Performance Ray Tracing @ 1080p
How much it can do. Price plays no part in this ranking.
#9 of 35 graded graphics cards
- #6 NVIDIARTX 5070 Ti 72
- #7 NVIDIARTX 4070 Ti Super 70
- #8 NVIDIARTX 4070 Ti 62
- #9 AMDRX 9070 XT 62
- #10 NVIDIARTX 5070 59
- #11 NVIDIARTX 4070 Super 58
- #12 AMDRX 7900 XTX 56
Value Ray Tracing @ 1080p
How much of that you get for today’s price.
#1 of 41 currently priced graphics cards
- #1 AMDRX 9070 XT 100
- #2 AMDRX 9070 90
- #3 NVIDIARTX 4080 Super 80
- #4 AMDRX 9070 GRE 80
- #5 NVIDIARTX 4070 Ti Super 80
- #6 NVIDIARTX 5070 79
- #7 NVIDIARTX 5070 Ti 77
Performance Ray Tracing @ 1440p
How much it can do. Price plays no part in this ranking.
#8 of 35 graded graphics cards
- #5 NVIDIARTX 4080 68
- #6 NVIDIARTX 5070 Ti 66
- #7 NVIDIARTX 4070 Ti Super 60
- #8 AMDRX 9070 XT 55
- #9 NVIDIARTX 4070 Ti 55
- #10 NVIDIARTX 5070 51
- #11 AMDRX 7900 XTX 50
Value Ray Tracing @ 1440p
How much of that you get for today’s price.
#1 of 41 currently priced graphics cards
- #1 AMDRX 9070 XT 100
- #2 AMDRX 9070 87
- #3 NVIDIARTX 4080 Super 80
- #4 NVIDIARTX 4070 Ti Super 79
- #5 NVIDIARTX 5080 77
- #6 NVIDIARTX 5070 Ti 77
- #7 NVIDIARTX 4090 75
Performance Ray Tracing @ 4K
How much it can do. Price plays no part in this ranking.
#8 of 35 graded graphics cards
- #5 NVIDIARTX 4080 58
- #6 NVIDIARTX 5070 Ti 57
- #7 NVIDIARTX 4070 Ti Super 50
- #8 AMDRX 9070 XT 47
- #9 AMDRX 7900 XTX 43
- #10 AMDRX 9070 40
- #11 NVIDIARTX 4070 Ti 37
Value Ray Tracing @ 4K
How much of that you get for today’s price.
#3 of 41 currently priced graphics cards
- #1 NVIDIARTX 5090 100
- #2 NVIDIARTX 4090 76
- #3 AMDRX 9070 XT 71
- #4 NVIDIARTX 5080 68
- #5 NVIDIARTX 4080 Super 64
- #6 NVIDIARTX 5070 Ti 61
- #7 AMDRX 9070 60
Performance AI
How much it can do. Price plays no part in this ranking.
#13 of 39 graded graphics cards
- #10 NVIDIARTX 4070 Super 34
- #11 NVIDIARTX 5070 29
- #12 NVIDIARTX 4070 28
- #13 AMDRX 9070 XT 23
- #14 NVIDIARTX 4060 Ti 8GB 21
- #15 NVIDIARTX 3070 Ti 21
- #16 AMDRX 9070 17
Value AI
How much of that you get for today’s price.
#11 of 41 currently priced graphics cards
- #8 NVIDIARTX PRO 4000 Blackwell 33
- #9 NVIDIARTX 4070 Super 28
- #10 NVIDIARTX 4070 Ti 25
- #11 AMDRX 9070 XT 25
- #12 NVIDIARTX 5070 24
- #13 NVIDIARTX 4070 21
- #14 AMDRX 9070 19
Performance 3D Rendering
How much it can do. Price plays no part in this ranking.
#21 of 37 graded graphics cards
- #18 NVIDIARTX 5060 24
- #19 NVIDIARTX 3070 Ti 23
- #20 NVIDIARTX 4060 23
- #21 AMDRX 9070 XT 22
- #22 AMDRX 9070 19
- #23 NVIDIARTX 5050 19
- #24 AMDRX 7900 GRE 19
Value 3D Rendering
How much of that you get for today’s price.
#10 of 41 currently priced graphics cards
- #7 NVIDIARTX 4080 44
- #8 NVIDIARTX 4070 Super 42
- #9 NVIDIARTX 4070 Ti 38
- #10 AMDRX 9070 XT 37
- #11 NVIDIARTX 5070 36
- #12 NVIDIARTX 4070 31
- #13 AMDRX 9070 27
Performance Light Use
How much it can do. Price plays no part in this ranking.
#34 of 39 graded graphics cards
- #31 NVIDIARTX 3070 Ti 46
- #32 NVIDIARTX 5070 Ti 44
- #33 AMDRX 7900 XT 44
- #34 AMDRX 9070 XT 43
- #35 NVIDIARTX 4080 39
- #36 NVIDIARTX 4080 Super 39
- #37 AMDRX 7900 XTX 30
Value Light Use
How much of that you get for today’s price.
#20 of 41 currently priced graphics cards
- #17 NVIDIARTX 5070 31
- #18 NVIDIARTX 4070 31
- #19 NVIDIARTX 4060 Ti 8GB 31
- #20 AMDRX 9070 XT 28
- #21 NVIDIARTX 3060 12GB 27
- #22 AMDRX 7700 XT 26
- #23 AMDRX 7800 XT 24
These ladders follow the preset scenario shown above. Your own weights re-score this product, not the whole field.
What it is good for
| Scenario | this productCapability grade · Value at current price | Higher capability | Higher Value with current priorities |
|---|---|---|---|
| Balanced (all-round)Weighted all-round view | GradeNo grade Value100 | — | — |
| 1080p GamingRaster performance · 1080p | GradeS Value93 | — | — |
| 1440p GamingRaster performance · 1440p | GradeS Value100 | — | — |
| 4K / VRRaster performance · 4K / VR | GradeA Value77 | — | — |
| Ray Tracing @ 1080pRay tracing capability · 1080p | GradeA Value100 | Higher capability RTX 4070 Ti Super A 80 +13% capability · +17% price | — |
| Ray Tracing @ 1440pRay tracing capability · 1440p | GradeB Value100 | Higher capability RTX 4070 Ti Super A 79 +8% capability · +17% price | — |
| Ray Tracing @ 4KRay tracing capability · 4K | GradeC Value71 | Higher capability RTX 4070 Ti Super C 58 +7% capability · +17% price | — |
| AI / Local LLMAI compute · memory and ecosystem fit | GradeB Value25 | Higher capability RTX 4070 Ti Super A 40 +81% capability · +17% price | Higher Value with current priorities RTX 4070 Super B 28 +46% capability · -7% price |
| 3D Rendering3D rendering · creator workloads | GradeC Value37 | Higher capability RTX 4070 Ti Super A 56 +107% capability · +17% price | Higher Value with current priorities RTX 4070 Super B 42 +78% capability · -7% price |
| Light Use & EfficiencyEfficiency · lighter workloads | GradeD Value28 | Higher capability Higher capability · Higher Value with current priorities RTX 3050 6GB S 100 +133% capability · -45% price | |
Balanced has no letter: it is a weighting preset, not a capability rubric. A grade answers “how well does this handle that job?” — price is never part of it. Relative Value puts the current market price back in.
Compare these grades with the full tier list
Browse shortlists for different uses
Trade-offs
Works well if
- 1080p Gaming is your main prioritygraded S for 1080p Gaming on the same rubric as the tier list
- Today's price already clears the strong-value markcheapest tracked CAD 1100 against a CAD 1513 threshold with Balanced priorities
- You want memory headroom — memory is not what limits it hereno memory cap applies to this grade — the raster index sets it, not the frame buffer
Consider other options if
- Not the pick if Light Use & Efficiency is your main useit grades only D there
Works well if
- 1080p is your main priority — S here means 144 Hz+ ultra with headroomgraded S for 1080p on the same rubric as the tier list
- Today's price already clears the strong-value markcheapest tracked CAD 1100 against a CAD 1279 threshold for 1080p
- You want memory headroom — 16 GB is above what this job needsthe same card with 8 GB grades A for 1080p; this one has 16 GB and hits no memory cap
Consider other options if
- Not the pick if Light Use & Efficiency is your main useit grades only D there
Works well if
- 1440p is your main priority — S here means 120 Hz+ at ultra with headroom (~130 fps+), 16 GB VRAMgraded S for 1440p on the same rubric as the tier list
- Today's price already clears the strong-value markcheapest tracked CAD 1100 against a CAD 1481 threshold for 1440p
- You want memory headroom — 16 GB is above what this job needsthe same card with 12 GB grades A for 1440p; this one has 16 GB and hits no memory cap
Consider other options if
- Not the pick if Light Use & Efficiency is your main useit grades only D there
Works well if
- 4K is your main priority — A here means 4K high at 60+ fps native (~70)graded A for 4K on the same rubric as the tier list
- Strong-value threshold: ~CAD 1014CAD 1014 is where Relative Value reaches 80 for 4K, in the 2026-10-24–2026-10-29 offer frame
- You want memory headroom — 16 GB is above what this job needsthe same card with 12 GB grades B for 4K; this one has 16 GB and hits no memory cap
Consider other options if
- Current price sits CAD 86 above the strong-value threshold (~CAD 1014)cheapest tracked CAD 1100 against a CAD 1014 calculated threshold for 4K
- Not the pick if Light Use & Efficiency is your main useit grades only D there
Works well if
- Ray Tracing @ 1080p is your main priority — A here means solid — a good base for upscalinggraded A for Ray Tracing @ 1080p on the same rubric as the tier list, from 78 fps measured natively (upscaling typically adds 40–60% on top)
- Today's price already clears the strong-value markcheapest tracked CAD 1100 against a CAD 1513 threshold for Ray Tracing @ 1080p
- You want memory headroom — 16 GB is above what this job needsthe same card with 6 GB grades C for Ray Tracing @ 1080p; this one has 16 GB and hits no memory cap
Consider other options if
- Not the pick if Light Use & Efficiency is your main useit grades only D there
Works well if
- Ray Tracing @ 1440p is your main priority — B here means solid — a good base for upscalinggraded B for Ray Tracing @ 1440p on the same rubric as the tier list, from 56 fps measured natively (upscaling typically adds 40–60% on top)
- Today's price already clears the strong-value markcheapest tracked CAD 1100 against a CAD 1513 threshold for Ray Tracing @ 1440p
- You want memory headroom — 16 GB is above what this job needsthe same card with 6 GB grades C for Ray Tracing @ 1440p; this one has 16 GB and hits no memory cap
Consider other options if
- Not the pick if Light Use & Efficiency is your main useit grades only D there
For the selected scenario this is not a strong fit — the grade above is the reason, and the models below suit it better.
Works well if
- Ray Tracing @ 4K is not actually your main job — 1080p Gaming isit grades C for Ray Tracing @ 4K, but S for 1080p Gaming
- Strong-value threshold: ~CAD 817CAD 817 is where Relative Value reaches 80 for Ray Tracing @ 4K, in the 2026-10-24–2026-10-29 offer frame
Consider other options if
- Not the pick if Ray Tracing @ 4K is your main useit grades C there; RTX 4070 Ti Super grades C at CAD 1283
- Current price sits CAD 283 above the strong-value threshold (~CAD 817)cheapest tracked CAD 1100 against a CAD 817 calculated threshold for Ray Tracing @ 4K
Works well if
- AI is your main prioritygraded B for AI on the same rubric as the tier list
- You want memory headroom — 16 GB is above what this job needsthe same card with 10 GB grades C for AI; this one has 16 GB and hits no memory cap
- FSR 4 with frame generation matters to youML upscaler + frame generation — derived from the rdna4 architecture, not from a scraped feature flag
Consider other options if
- You want strong value for AI specificallycompeting products deliver so much more for AI per dollar that no price this model realistically trades at reaches the strong-value mark for this job
- Value for money matters more to you than this exact modelRTX 4070 Super holds Relative Value 28 against its 25 for AI, at CAD 1026
- Not the pick if Light Use & Efficiency is your main useit grades only D there
For the selected scenario this is not a strong fit — the grade above is the reason, and the models below suit it better.
Works well if
- 3D Rendering is not actually your main job — 1080p Gaming isit grades C for 3D Rendering, but S for 1080p Gaming
Consider other options if
- Not the pick if 3D Rendering is your main useit grades C there; RTX 4070 Ti Super grades A at CAD 1283
- You want strong value for 3D Rendering specificallyat today's market no realistic price for this model reaches strong value for 3D Rendering — the calculation only gets there near CAD 299, against a cheapest tracked CAD 1100
- Value for money matters more to you than this exact modelRTX 4070 Super holds Relative Value 42 against its 37 for 3D Rendering, at CAD 1026
For the selected scenario this is not a strong fit — the grade above is the reason, and the models below suit it better.
Works well if
- Light Use is not actually your main job — 1080p Gaming isit grades D for Light Use, but S for 1080p Gaming
Consider other options if
- Not the pick if Light Use is your main useit grades D there; RTX 3050 6GB grades S at CAD 600
- You want strong value for Light Use specificallyat today's market no realistic price for this model reaches strong value for Light Use — the calculation only gets there near CAD 277, against a cheapest tracked CAD 1100
- Value for money matters more to you than this exact modelRTX 3050 6GB holds Relative Value 100 against its 28 for Light Use, at CAD 600
Every line states the fact it was derived from, for the scenario selected above. Thresholds are calculated points on our value curve — information about where the maths turns, not instructions about what to pay.
Similar options to the RX 9070 XT
Chosen for Ray Tracing @ 1080p
Chosen for Ray Tracing @ 1440p
Chosen for Ray Tracing @ 4K
Chosen for AI
This scenario carries a requirement candidates are checked against first: CUDA — Many local-LLM and diffusion toolchains are CUDA-only. ROCm and Vulkan builds exist and work, but they are not drop-in — check your toolchain before treating a non-NVIDIA card as an equivalent swap.
Chosen for 3D Rendering
This scenario carries a requirement candidates are checked against first: OptiX — Blender Cycles reaches its fastest path on NVIDIA OptiX. HIP (AMD) and oneAPI (Intel) render the same scenes, so this is a workflow question, not a capability wall — but render times and add-on support differ.
Chosen for Light Use
More head-to-head comparisons in this category
Upgrade planner
Judge the change in the active scenario, then make the cash gap explicit.
Using page scenarioWhat are you upgrading from? These are the axes we compare on, and where this product stands in the current market.
We rank upgrades by out-of-pocket cost — the new price minus what yours is worth — not by sticker price.
Only candidates that clear the configured meaningful-upgrade gate will be shown; roles are omitted rather than filled.
Capability differences are expressed as tiers and index points, not as benchmark percentages we did not measure.
Specifications and compatibility
What this product is, and what to check before it goes into your build.
Core / Performance
- Architecture
- RDNA 4.0
- GPU chip
- Navi 48
- GPU variant
- Navi 48 XTX (215-176600315)
- Process node
- 4 nm
- Transistors
- 53,900 million
- Shading units
- 4096
Memory
Power / Interface
- Board power (TBP)
- 304 W
- Power connector
- Varies by version
- Recommended PSU
- Varies by version
- Bus interface
- PCIe 5.0 x16
Physical / Outputs
- Length
- Varies by version288–340 mm across tracked variants
- Height
- Varies by version111–132 mm across tracked variants
- Width
- Varies by version
- Slot thickness
- Varies by version2–3 across tracked variants
- Fans
- Varies by version2–3 across tracked variants
- Cooling
- Varies by version
- Outputs
- Varies by version
Power / Interface
- Board power (TBP)
- 304 W
- Power connector
- 3x 8-pin
- Recommended PSU
- 700 W
- Bus interface
- PCIe 5.0 x16
Physical / Outputs
- Length
- 288 mm
- Height
- 132 mm
- Width
- Unknown
- Slot thickness
- 3 slots
- Fans
- 3
- Cooling
- Air
- Outputs
- 2× DisplayPort · 2× HDMI
Exact board / Identity
- Board part number
- GV-R9070XTGAMING OC-16GD
- Vendor warranty
- 3 years
Power / Interface
- Board power (TBP)
- 304 W
- Power connector
- 2x 8-pin
- Recommended PSU
- 700 W
- Bus interface
- PCIe 5.0 x16
Physical / Outputs
- Length
- 332 mm
- Height
- 122 mm
- Width
- Unknown
- Slot thickness
- 3 slots
- Fans
- 3
- Cooling
- Air
- Outputs
- 3× DisplayPort · 1× HDMI
Exact board / Identity
- Board part number
- RX9070XT 16G-L/OC/REVA
- Vendor warranty
- 2 years
Power / Interface
- Board power (TBP)
- 304 W
- Power connector
- 2x 8-pin
- Recommended PSU
- 700 W
- Bus interface
- PCIe 5.0 x16
Physical / Outputs
- Length
- 289 mm
- Height
- 111 mm
- Width
- Unknown
- Slot thickness
- 2 slots
- Fans
- 3
- Cooling
- Air
- Outputs
- 3× DisplayPort · 1× HDMI
Exact board / Identity
- Board part number
- RX9070XT 16G-A
- Vendor warranty
- 2 years
Power / Interface
- Board power (TBP)
- 304 W
- Power connector
- 3x 8-pin
- Recommended PSU
- 700 W
- Bus interface
- PCIe 5.0 x16
Physical / Outputs
- Length
- 340 mm
- Height
- 132 mm
- Width
- Unknown
- Slot thickness
- 3 slots
- Fans
- 3
- Cooling
- Air
- Outputs
- 3× DisplayPort · 1× HDMI
Exact board / Identity
- Board part number
- RX9070XT 16G-E/OC
- Vendor warranty
- 2 years
Power / Interface
- Board power (TBP)
- 304 W
- Power connector
- 2x 8-pin
- Recommended PSU
- 700 W
- Bus interface
- PCIe 5.0 x16
Physical / Outputs
- Length
- 320 mm
- Height
- 120 mm
- Width
- Unknown
- Slot thickness
- 3 slots
- Fans
- 2
- Cooling
- Air
- Outputs
- 2× DisplayPort · 2× HDMI
Exact board / Identity
- Board part number
- 11348-07-78
- Vendor warranty
- 2 years
Power / Interface
- Board power (TBP)
- 304 W
- Power connector
- 2x 8-pin
- Recommended PSU
- 700 W
- Bus interface
- PCIe 5.0 x16
Physical / Outputs
- Length
- Unknown
- Height
- Unknown
- Width
- Unknown
- Slot thickness
- Unknown
- Fans
- Unknown
- Cooling
- Air
- Outputs
- Unknown
Exact board / Identity
- Board part number
- GV-R907XGAMINGOCICE-16GD
- Vendor warranty
- 3 months
Power / Interface
- Board power (TBP)
- 304 W
- Power connector
- 2x 8-pin
- Recommended PSU
- 700 W
- Bus interface
- PCIe 5.0 x16
Physical / Outputs
- Length
- Unknown
- Height
- Unknown
- Width
- Unknown
- Slot thickness
- Unknown
- Fans
- Unknown
- Cooling
- Air
- Outputs
- Unknown
Exact board / Identity
- Board part number
- 11348-01-20G
- Vendor warranty
- 2 years
Select an exact version for physical dimensions and connector details.
Show all specifications
Core / Performance
- Texture units
- 256
- ROPs
- 128
- Ray tracing cores
- 64
- Tensor cores
- 0
- Base clock
- 1660 MHz
- Boost clock
- 3010 MHz
Features
- Upscaling
- FSR 4
- Frame generation
- frame generation
- Ray tracing
- Supported
- RGB lighting
- No
Warranty & release
- Release year
- 2025
Hover any value to see where it came from: a manufacturer specification, or a figure The Comparator calculated.
Sources: Comparator offer frame 2026-10-24–2026-10-29
What to check in your build
Varies by version
The exact requirement depends on the version you select.
Varies by version
Select a board to confirm its connector and cable-clearance needs.
Varies by version
The exact requirement depends on the version you select.
Varies by version
The exact requirement depends on the version you select.
Varies by version
Slot occupancy depends on the board cooler and thickness.
Select an exact version above for physical dimensions and connector details.
700 W PSU recommended
Whole-system figure from the board vendor — it already allows for the processor and transient spikes.
3x 8-pin required
Adapters work but add connector bulk and need extra cable-bend clearance.
Needs at least 288 mm of GPU clearance
Front radiators and fans eat into the figure a case advertises.
Leave room beyond the card for the cable bend
No verified minimum is published — measure it.
Occupies 3 slots
The cooler covers the slots below it — check nothing adjacent needs that space.
700 W PSU recommended
Whole-system figure from the board vendor — it already allows for the processor and transient spikes.
2x 8-pin required
Adapters work but add connector bulk and need extra cable-bend clearance.
Needs at least 332 mm of GPU clearance
Front radiators and fans eat into the figure a case advertises.
Leave room beyond the card for the cable bend
No verified minimum is published — measure it.
Occupies 3 slots
The cooler covers the slots below it — check nothing adjacent needs that space.
700 W PSU recommended
Whole-system figure from the board vendor — it already allows for the processor and transient spikes.
2x 8-pin required
Adapters work but add connector bulk and need extra cable-bend clearance.
Needs at least 289 mm of GPU clearance
Front radiators and fans eat into the figure a case advertises.
Leave room beyond the card for the cable bend
No verified minimum is published — measure it.
Occupies 2 slots
The cooler covers the slots below it — check nothing adjacent needs that space.
700 W PSU recommended
Whole-system figure from the board vendor — it already allows for the processor and transient spikes.
3x 8-pin required
Adapters work but add connector bulk and need extra cable-bend clearance.
Needs at least 340 mm of GPU clearance
Front radiators and fans eat into the figure a case advertises.
Leave room beyond the card for the cable bend
No verified minimum is published — measure it.
Occupies 3 slots
The cooler covers the slots below it — check nothing adjacent needs that space.
700 W PSU recommended
Whole-system figure from the board vendor — it already allows for the processor and transient spikes.
2x 8-pin required
Adapters work but add connector bulk and need extra cable-bend clearance.
Needs at least 320 mm of GPU clearance
Front radiators and fans eat into the figure a case advertises.
Leave room beyond the card for the cable bend
No verified minimum is published — measure it.
Occupies 3 slots
The cooler covers the slots below it — check nothing adjacent needs that space.
700 W PSU recommended
Whole-system figure from the board vendor — it already allows for the processor and transient spikes.
2x 8-pin required
Adapters work but add connector bulk and need extra cable-bend clearance.
Unknown
Leave room beyond the card for the cable bend
No verified minimum is published — measure it.
Unknown
700 W PSU recommended
Whole-system figure from the board vendor — it already allows for the processor and transient spikes.
2x 8-pin required
Adapters work but add connector bulk and need extra cable-bend clearance.
Unknown
Leave room beyond the card for the cable bend
No verified minimum is published — measure it.
Unknown
Compare all 7 board variants
| Variant | Length | Slot thickness | Power connector | Recommended PSU |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GIGABYTE RX 9070 XT GAMING OC | 288 mm | 3 | 3x 8-pin | 700 W |
| PowerColor Hellhound Reva RX 9070 XT | 332 mm | 3 | 2x 8-pin | 700 W |
| PowerColor Reaper RX 9070 XT | 289 mm | 2 | 2x 8-pin | 700 W |
| PowerColor Red Devil RX 9070 XT | 340 mm | 3 | 3x 8-pin | 700 W |
| Sapphire METAL Alloy Pulse RX 9070 XT | 320 mm | 3 | 2x 8-pin | 700 W |
| Gigabyte Radeon RX 9070 XT GAMING OC ICE 16GB | Unknown | Unknown | 2x 8-pin | 700 W |
| Sapphire NITRO+ Radeon RX 9070 XT PhantomLink 16GB | Unknown | Unknown | 2x 8-pin | 700 W |
Found an error? Report this specification Email the field, corrected value and an optional source.
Compatibility guidance is practical help, not a score. Missing data is shown as unknown, never invented.
Summary
RX 9070 XT offers a balanced view across an all-round mix of priorities. It ranks #8 by capability in the current modelled field. Its clearest measured strength is raster index 1420. The main limitation appears when Light Use & Efficiency becomes the priority, where it grades D.
RX 9070 XT offers S-grade capability for 1080p. It ranks #8 by capability in the current modelled field. Its clearest measured strength is raster index 1420. The main limitation appears when Light Use & Efficiency becomes the priority, where it grades D.
RX 9070 XT offers S-grade capability for 1440p. It ranks #8 by capability in the current modelled field. Its clearest measured strength is raster index 1420. The main limitation appears when Light Use & Efficiency becomes the priority, where it grades D.
RX 9070 XT offers A-grade capability for 4K. It ranks #8 by capability in the current modelled field. Its clearest measured strength is raster index 1420. The main limitation appears when Light Use & Efficiency becomes the priority, where it grades D.
RX 9070 XT offers A-grade capability for Ray Tracing @ 1080p. It ranks #9 by capability in the current modelled field. Its clearest measured strength is ray-tracing index 1470. The main limitation appears when Light Use & Efficiency becomes the priority, where it grades D.
RX 9070 XT offers B-grade capability for Ray Tracing @ 1440p. It ranks #8 by capability in the current modelled field. Its clearest measured strength is ray-tracing index 1470. The main limitation appears when Light Use & Efficiency becomes the priority, where it grades D.
RX 9070 XT offers C-grade capability for Ray Tracing @ 4K. It ranks #8 by capability in the current modelled field. Its clearest measured strength is ray-tracing index 1470. The C grade is the decisive limitation for this workload.
RX 9070 XT offers B-grade capability for AI. It ranks #13 by capability in the current modelled field. Its clearest measured strength is ai compute index 835. The main limitation appears when Light Use & Efficiency becomes the priority, where it grades D.
RX 9070 XT offers C-grade capability for 3D Rendering. It ranks #21 by capability in the current modelled field. Its clearest measured strength is raster index 1420. The C grade is the decisive limitation for this workload.
RX 9070 XT offers D-grade capability for Light Use. It ranks #34 by capability in the current modelled field. Its clearest measured strength is raster index 1420. The D grade is the decisive limitation for this workload.
FAQ
Do all RX 9070 XT boards have the same physical design?
No. Dimensions, slot thickness, cooling, power connectors and display outputs belong to the exact board. Use the Exact version selector before checking case or PSU fit.
How much case clearance should I allow for the RX 9070 XT?
Tracked boards range from 288 to 340 mm in length. Select the exact board, then also allow for front radiators or fans, card height, slot thickness and power-cable bend; length alone does not guarantee fit.
Do all RX 9070 XT boards use the same power connector?
No. Tracked versions use 3x 8-pin or 2x 8-pin. The connector shown in Specifications & compatibility changes with the exact board selection.
Why does Relative Value change when I choose another scenario?
Each scenario changes the weights applied to capability, price and the other published factors. The hardware facts stay fixed, but the value question changes, so its score and rank can change too.
Useful links & sources
offer frame 2026-10-24–2026-10-29 · formula gpu-value-v1.4 · facts facts-2026-10-29 · Relative Value is an estimate from our current dataset, the selected weights and dated market prices — not an official product rating and not a price forecast. Target prices are calculation thresholds, not predictions. Methodology We are not a shop. Affiliate links may earn us a commission; they never change the calculations or the ranking.