RX 9070 GRE
The current RX 9070 GRE price from retailers, its key specifications, and how it performs for each job.
Navi 48 · GPU · RX 9000
Retailer photo of GIGABYTE Gaming Radeon RX 9070 GRE OC 12GB. View this offer in Where to buy
Works well for: 1080p Gaming, 1440p Gaming
Trade-offs: Not the pick if 3D Rendering is your main use
- VRAM
- 12 GB
- Board power
- 215 W
- Interface
- PCIe 5.0 x16
Move a slider and the page re-scores this product against the same market frame.
What does it cost today, and is that a good price?
Market confidence: HighAt CAD 750 the RX 9070 GRE is priced 6% below its CAD 800 representative market level. Only one retailer currently backs that price, so the level is a single data point rather than a market.
Limited market: only one retailer currently has a verified offer, so treat this price as a single data point.
Prices & availability
RX 9070 GRE: current price and offers
Compare the offers we track for this model, across variants and retailers.
5 tracked offers · 1 retailers
| Variant | Store | Condition | Price (snapshot) | Value · Balanced | Checked | Offer link |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GIGABYTE Gaming Radeon RX 9070 GRE OC 12GB | Newegg | New | CAD 750 | 95 | 2026-10-29 | View offer → |
| ASRock Steel Legend Radeon RX 9070 GRE 12GB | Newegg | New | CAD 760 | 94 | 2026-10-29 | View offer → |
| ASUS PRIME Radeon RX 9070 GRE EVO OC 12GB | Newegg | New | CAD 800 | 91 | 2026-10-29 | View offer → |
| Sapphire PURE RX 9070 GRE | Newegg | New | CAD 1,600 | 56 | 2026-10-29 | View offer → |
| Sapphire PULSE RX 9070 GRE | Newegg | New | CAD 1,600 | 56 | 2026-10-29 | View offer → |
| RX 9070 GREMultiple variants available | Amazon Affiliate | Varies | Find on Amazon | Not tracked | No price snapshot | Find on Amazon → |
Prices are dated snapshots, not live quotes — confirm the final price at the store. New, refurbished and used offers are listed separately; used offers carry warranty and seller risk.
Performance and where it ranks
Two different questions, side by side. Performance compares what the hardware can do; Value compares what that capability costs at today’s price. A product can rank high on one and low on the other — that gap is the point.
Performance Balanced
How much it can do. Price plays no part in this ranking.
#17 of 40 graded graphics cards
- #14 AMDRX 9070 50
- #15 NVIDIARTX 4070 Super 49
- #16 AMDRX 7900 GRE 45
- #17 AMDRX 9070 GRE 43
- #18 AMDRX 7800 XT 43
- #19 NVIDIARTX 4070 42
- #20 IntelIntel Arc Pro B70 42
Value Balanced
How much of that you get for today’s price.
#3 of 41 currently priced graphics cards
- #1 AMDRX 9070 XT 100
- #2 AMDRX 9060 XT 16GB 97
- #3 AMDRX 9070 GRE 95
- #4 AMDRX 9070 94
- #5 AMDRX 9060 XT 8GB 85
- #6 NVIDIARTX 4070 Ti Super 84
- #7 NVIDIARTX 4070 Super 83
Performance 1080p
How much it can do. Price plays no part in this ranking.
#17 of 40 graded graphics cards
- #14 AMDRX 9070 50
- #15 NVIDIARTX 4070 Super 49
- #16 AMDRX 7900 GRE 45
- #17 AMDRX 9070 GRE 43
- #18 AMDRX 7800 XT 43
- #19 NVIDIARTX 4070 42
- #20 IntelIntel Arc Pro B70 42
Value 1080p
How much of that you get for today’s price.
#2 of 41 currently priced graphics cards
- #1 AMDRX 9060 XT 16GB 100
- #2 AMDRX 9070 GRE 100
- #3 AMDRX 9060 XT 8GB 97
- #4 AMDRX 9070 XT 93
- #5 AMDRX 9070 89
- #6 NVIDIARTX 5060 Ti 8GB 81
- #7 NVIDIARTX 5060 80
Performance 1440p
How much it can do. Price plays no part in this ranking.
#17 of 40 graded graphics cards
- #14 AMDRX 9070 50
- #15 NVIDIARTX 4070 Super 49
- #16 AMDRX 7900 GRE 45
- #17 AMDRX 9070 GRE 43
- #18 AMDRX 7800 XT 43
- #19 NVIDIARTX 4070 42
- #20 IntelIntel Arc Pro B70 42
Value 1440p
How much of that you get for today’s price.
#4 of 41 currently priced graphics cards
- #1 AMDRX 9070 XT 100
- #2 AMDRX 9070 89
- #3 AMDRX 9060 XT 16GB 83
- #4 AMDRX 9070 GRE 83
- #5 NVIDIARTX 4070 Ti Super 81
- #6 NVIDIARTX 4080 Super 76
- #7 NVIDIARTX 4090 75
Performance 4K
How much it can do. Price plays no part in this ranking.
#17 of 40 graded graphics cards
- #14 AMDRX 9070 50
- #15 NVIDIARTX 4070 Super 49
- #16 AMDRX 7900 GRE 45
- #17 AMDRX 9070 GRE 43
- #18 AMDRX 7800 XT 43
- #19 NVIDIARTX 4070 42
- #20 IntelIntel Arc Pro B70 42
Value 4K
How much of that you get for today’s price.
#14 of 41 currently priced graphics cards
- #11 AMDRX 7900 XT 52
- #12 AMDRX 9060 XT 16GB 52
- #13 NVIDIARTX 4080 51
- #14 AMDRX 9070 GRE 51
- #15 NVIDIARTX 4070 Super 50
- #16 NVIDIARTX 4070 Ti 44
- #17 AMDRX 7800 XT 42
Performance Ray Tracing @ 1080p
How much it can do. Price plays no part in this ranking.
#16 of 35 graded graphics cards
- #13 AMDRX 9070 54
- #14 NVIDIARTX 4070 51
- #15 AMDRX 7900 XT 49
- #16 AMDRX 9070 GRE 46
- #17 AMDRX 7900 GRE 46
- #18 NVIDIARTX 5060 Ti 16GB 45
- #19 AMDRX 7800 XT 39
Value Ray Tracing @ 1080p
How much of that you get for today’s price.
#4 of 41 currently priced graphics cards
- #1 AMDRX 9070 XT 100
- #2 AMDRX 9070 90
- #3 NVIDIARTX 4080 Super 80
- #4 AMDRX 9070 GRE 80
- #5 NVIDIARTX 4070 Ti Super 80
- #6 NVIDIARTX 5070 79
- #7 NVIDIARTX 5070 Ti 77
Performance Ray Tracing @ 1440p
How much it can do. Price plays no part in this ranking.
#17 of 35 graded graphics cards
- #14 AMDRX 7900 XT 43
- #15 NVIDIARTX 5060 Ti 16GB 39
- #16 NVIDIARTX 4070 38
- #17 AMDRX 9070 GRE 37
- #18 AMDRX 7900 GRE 34
- #19 AMDRX 7800 XT 33
- #20 AMDRX 9060 XT 16GB 31
Value Ray Tracing @ 1440p
How much of that you get for today’s price.
#9 of 41 currently priced graphics cards
- #6 NVIDIARTX 5070 Ti 77
- #7 NVIDIARTX 4090 75
- #8 NVIDIARTX 5070 75
- #9 AMDRX 9070 GRE 75
- #10 NVIDIARTX 4070 Super 71
- #11 NVIDIARTX 5090 71
- #12 AMDRX 9060 XT 16GB 68
Performance Ray Tracing @ 4K
How much it can do. Price plays no part in this ranking.
#18 of 35 graded graphics cards
- #15 NVIDIARTX 5060 Ti 16GB 32
- #16 NVIDIARTX 4070 30
- #17 AMDRX 7900 GRE 27
- #18 AMDRX 9070 GRE 24
- #19 AMDRX 7800 XT 24
- #20 AMDRX 9060 XT 16GB 23
- #21 AMDRX 7700 XT 15
Value Ray Tracing @ 4K
How much of that you get for today’s price.
#13 of 41 currently priced graphics cards
- #10 NVIDIARTX 4080 49
- #11 NVIDIARTX 4070 Super 46
- #12 AMDRX 7900 XTX 45
- #13 AMDRX 9070 GRE 44
- #14 AMDRX 9060 XT 16GB 43
- #15 AMDRX 7900 XT 41
- #16 NVIDIARTX 4070 Ti 41
Performance AI
How much it can do. Price plays no part in this ranking.
#17 of 39 graded graphics cards
- #14 NVIDIARTX 4060 Ti 8GB 21
- #15 NVIDIARTX 3070 Ti 21
- #16 AMDRX 9070 17
- #17 AMDRX 9070 GRE 16
- #18 NVIDIARTX 3060 Ti 15
- #19 AMDRX 7900 XTX 15
- #20 AMDRX 7900 XT 12
Value AI
How much of that you get for today’s price.
#15 of 41 currently priced graphics cards
- #12 NVIDIARTX 5070 24
- #13 NVIDIARTX 4070 21
- #14 AMDRX 9070 19
- #15 AMDRX 9070 GRE 16
- #16 AMDRX 9060 XT 16GB 16
- #17 AMDRX 7900 XTX 13
- #18 NVIDIARTX PRO 4500 Blackwell 13
Performance 3D Rendering
How much it can do. Price plays no part in this ranking.
#28 of 37 graded graphics cards
- #25 NVIDIARTX 3060 Ti 18
- #26 IntelIntel Arc Pro B70 17
- #27 AMDRX 7800 XT 16
- #28 AMDRX 9070 GRE 16
- #29 AMDRX 7700 XT 15
- #30 NVIDIARTX 3060 12GB 14
- #31 NVIDIARTX A2000 14
Value 3D Rendering
How much of that you get for today’s price.
#15 of 41 currently priced graphics cards
- #12 NVIDIARTX 4070 31
- #13 AMDRX 9070 27
- #14 NVIDIARTX PRO 4000 Blackwell 24
- #15 AMDRX 9070 GRE 24
- #16 AMDRX 9060 XT 16GB 20
- #17 AMDRX 7900 XTX 14
- #18 AMDRX 9060 XT 8GB 14
Performance Light Use
How much it can do. Price plays no part in this ranking.
#20 of 39 graded graphics cards
- #17 NVIDIARTX 5060 Ti 16GB 73
- #18 NVIDIARTX 4070 68
- #19 NVIDIARTX 3060 Ti 68
- #20 AMDRX 9070 GRE 65
- #21 NVIDIARTX 4070 Super 63
- #22 AMDRX 9070 63
- #23 AMDRX 6700 XT 61
Value Light Use
How much of that you get for today’s price.
#12 of 41 currently priced graphics cards
- #9 NVIDIARTX 4060 52
- #10 NVIDIARTX 5060 Ti 8GB 52
- #11 NVIDIARTX A2000 47
- #12 AMDRX 9070 GRE 47
- #13 NVIDIARTX 3050 8GB 43
- #14 NVIDIARTX 5060 Ti 16GB 40
- #15 AMDRX 9070 39
These ladders follow the preset scenario shown above. Your own weights re-score this product, not the whole field.
What it is good for
| Scenario | this productCapability grade · Value at current price | Higher capability |
|---|---|---|
| Balanced (all-round)Weighted all-round view | GradeNo grade Value95 | — |
| 1080p GamingRaster performance · 1080p | GradeS Value100 | — |
| 1440p GamingRaster performance · 1440p | GradeA Value83 | — |
| 4K / VRRaster performance · 4K / VR | GradeC Value51 | — |
| Ray Tracing @ 1080pRay tracing capability · 1080p | GradeB Value80 | — |
| Ray Tracing @ 1440pRay tracing capability · 1440p | GradeC Value75 | — |
| Ray Tracing @ 4KRay tracing capability · 4K | GradeF Value44 | — |
| AI / Local LLMAI compute · memory and ecosystem fit | GradeB Value16 | — |
| 3D Rendering3D rendering · creator workloads | GradeD Value24 | Higher capability RTX 5060 Ti 8GB B 13 +78% capability · -1% price |
| Light Use & EfficiencyEfficiency · lighter workloads | GradeC Value47 | Higher capability Higher capability · Higher Value with current priorities RTX 3050 6GB S 100 +55% capability · -20% price |
Balanced has no letter: it is a weighting preset, not a capability rubric. A grade answers “how well does this handle that job?” — price is never part of it. Relative Value puts the current market price back in.
Compare these grades with the full tier list
Browse shortlists for different uses
Trade-offs
Works well if
- 1080p Gaming is your main prioritygraded S for 1080p Gaming on the same rubric as the tier list
- Today's price already clears the strong-value markcheapest tracked CAD 750 against a CAD 956 threshold with Balanced priorities
- You want memory headroom — memory is not what limits it hereno memory cap applies to this grade — the raster index sets it, not the frame buffer
Consider other options if
- Not the pick if 3D Rendering is your main useit grades only D there
Works well if
- 1080p is your main priority — S here means 144 Hz+ ultra with headroomgraded S for 1080p on the same rubric as the tier list
- Today's price already clears the strong-value markcheapest tracked CAD 750 against a CAD 933 threshold for 1080p
- You want memory headroom — 12 GB is above what this job needsthe same card with 8 GB grades A for 1080p; this one has 12 GB and hits no memory cap
Consider other options if
- Not the pick if 3D Rendering is your main useit grades only D there
Works well if
- 1440p is your main priority — A here means confident 90–130 fps at high settings, 12 GB+ VRAMgraded A for 1440p on the same rubric as the tier list
- Today's price already clears the strong-value markcheapest tracked CAD 750 against a CAD 784 threshold for 1440p
- You want memory headroom — 12 GB is above what this job needsthe same card with 10 GB grades B for 1440p; this one has 12 GB and hits no memory cap
Consider other options if
- Not the pick if 3D Rendering is your main useit grades only D there
For the selected scenario this is not a strong fit — the grade above is the reason, and the models below suit it better.
Works well if
- 4K is not actually your main job — 1080p Gaming isit grades C for 4K, but S for 1080p Gaming
Consider other options if
- Not the pick if 4K is your main useit grades C there; RX 9060 XT 16GB grades C at CAD 730
- You want strong value for 4K specificallyat today's market no realistic price for this model reaches strong value for 4K — the calculation only gets there near CAD 271, against a cheapest tracked CAD 750
- You are buying for 4K and want no asterisksthe rubric caps this grade: upscaler data missing
Works well if
- Ray Tracing @ 1080p is your main priority — B here means playablegraded B for Ray Tracing @ 1080p on the same rubric as the tier list, from 58 fps measured natively (upscaling typically adds 40–60% on top)
- Today's price already clears the strong-value markcheapest tracked CAD 750 against a CAD 751 threshold for Ray Tracing @ 1080p
- You want memory headroom — memory is not what limits it hereno memory cap applies to this grade for Ray Tracing @ 1080p — the raster index sets it, not the frame buffer
Consider other options if
- Not the pick if 3D Rendering is your main useit grades only D there
For the selected scenario this is not a strong fit — the grade above is the reason, and the models below suit it better.
Works well if
- Ray Tracing @ 1440p is not actually your main job — 1080p Gaming isit grades C for Ray Tracing @ 1440p, but S for 1080p Gaming
- Strong-value threshold: ~CAD 688CAD 688 is where Relative Value reaches 80 for Ray Tracing @ 1440p, in the 2026-10-24–2026-10-29 offer frame
Consider other options if
- Not the pick if Ray Tracing @ 1440p is your main useit grades C there; RX 9060 XT 16GB grades C at CAD 730
- Current price sits CAD 62 above the strong-value threshold (~CAD 688)cheapest tracked CAD 750 against a CAD 688 calculated threshold for Ray Tracing @ 1440p
For the selected scenario this is not a strong fit — the grade above is the reason, and the models below suit it better.
Works well if
- Ray Tracing @ 4K is not actually your main job — 1080p Gaming isit grades F for Ray Tracing @ 4K, but S for 1080p Gaming
Consider other options if
- Not the pick if Ray Tracing @ 4K is your main useit grades F there; RX 9060 XT 16GB grades F at CAD 730
- You want strong value for Ray Tracing @ 4K specificallycompeting products deliver so much more for Ray Tracing @ 4K per dollar that no price this model realistically trades at reaches the strong-value mark for this job
Works well if
- AI is your main prioritygraded B for AI on the same rubric as the tier list
- You want memory headroom — 12 GB is above what this job needsthe same card with 10 GB grades C for AI; this one has 12 GB and hits no memory cap
- FSR 4 with frame generation matters to youML upscaler + frame generation — derived from the rdna4 architecture, not from a scraped feature flag
Consider other options if
- You want strong value for AI specificallycompeting products deliver so much more for AI per dollar that no price this model realistically trades at reaches the strong-value mark for this job
- Not the pick if 3D Rendering is your main useit grades only D there
For the selected scenario this is not a strong fit — the grade above is the reason, and the models below suit it better.
Works well if
- 3D Rendering is not actually your main job — 1080p Gaming isit grades D for 3D Rendering, but S for 1080p Gaming
Consider other options if
- Not the pick if 3D Rendering is your main useit grades D there; RTX 5060 Ti 8GB grades B at CAD 740
- You want strong value for 3D Rendering specificallycompeting products deliver so much more for 3D Rendering per dollar that no price this model realistically trades at reaches the strong-value mark for this job
- Value for money matters more to you than this exact modelRTX 5060 holds Relative Value 10 against its 24 for 3D Rendering. Check on Amazon.
For the selected scenario this is not a strong fit — the grade above is the reason, and the models below suit it better.
Works well if
- Light Use is not actually your main job — 1080p Gaming isit grades C for Light Use, but S for 1080p Gaming
Consider other options if
- Not the pick if Light Use is your main useit grades C there; RTX 3050 6GB grades S at CAD 600
- You want strong value for Light Use specificallyat today's market no realistic price for this model reaches strong value for Light Use — the calculation only gets there near CAD 369, against a cheapest tracked CAD 750
- Value for money matters more to you than this exact modelRTX 3050 6GB holds Relative Value 100 against its 47 for Light Use, at CAD 600
Every line states the fact it was derived from, for the scenario selected above. Thresholds are calculated points on our value curve — information about where the maths turns, not instructions about what to pay.
Similar options to the RX 9070 GRE
Chosen for Balanced
Chosen for 1080p
Chosen for 1440p
Chosen for 4K
Chosen for Ray Tracing @ 1080p
Chosen for Ray Tracing @ 1440p
Chosen for Ray Tracing @ 4K
Chosen for AI
This scenario carries a requirement candidates are checked against first: CUDA — Many local-LLM and diffusion toolchains are CUDA-only. ROCm and Vulkan builds exist and work, but they are not drop-in — check your toolchain before treating a non-NVIDIA card as an equivalent swap.
Chosen for 3D Rendering
This scenario carries a requirement candidates are checked against first: OptiX — Blender Cycles reaches its fastest path on NVIDIA OptiX. HIP (AMD) and oneAPI (Intel) render the same scenes, so this is a workflow question, not a capability wall — but render times and add-on support differ.
Chosen for Light Use
Alternatives stay near this product’s price range. Step-up options may exceed the standard budget envelope when the capability gain is meaningful.
More head-to-head comparisons in this category
Upgrade planner
Judge the change in the active scenario, then make the cash gap explicit.
Using page scenarioWhat are you upgrading from? These are the axes we compare on, and where this product stands in the current market.
We rank upgrades by out-of-pocket cost — the new price minus what yours is worth — not by sticker price.
Only candidates that clear the configured meaningful-upgrade gate will be shown; roles are omitted rather than filled.
Capability differences are expressed as tiers and index points, not as benchmark percentages we did not measure.
Specifications and compatibility
What this product is, and what to check before it goes into your build.
Memory
Power / Interface
- Board power (TBP)
- 215 W
- Power connector
- Varies by version
- Recommended PSU
- Varies by version
- Bus interface
- PCIe 5.0 x16
Physical / Outputs
- Length
- Varies by version280–320 mm across tracked variants
- Height
- Varies by version120 mm across tracked variants
- Width
- Varies by version
- Slot thickness
- Varies by version2–3 across tracked variants
- Fans
- Varies by version2–3 across tracked variants
- Cooling
- Varies by version
- Outputs
- Varies by version
Power / Interface
- Board power (TBP)
- 215 W
- Power connector
- 2x 8-pin
- Recommended PSU
- 550 W
- Bus interface
- PCIe 5.0 x16
Physical / Outputs
- Length
- 280 mm
- Height
- 120 mm
- Width
- Unknown
- Slot thickness
- 2 slots
- Fans
- 2
- Cooling
- Air
- Outputs
- 2× DisplayPort · 2× HDMI
Exact board / Identity
- Board part number
- 11354-05-78
- Vendor warranty
- 2 years
Power / Interface
- Board power (TBP)
- 215 W
- Power connector
- 2x 8-pin
- Recommended PSU
- 550 W
- Bus interface
- PCIe 5.0 x16
Physical / Outputs
- Length
- 320 mm
- Height
- 120 mm
- Width
- Unknown
- Slot thickness
- 3 slots
- Fans
- 3
- Cooling
- Air
- Outputs
- 2× DisplayPort · 2× HDMI
Exact board / Identity
- Board part number
- 11354-06-78
- Vendor warranty
- 2 years
Power / Interface
- Board power (TBP)
- 215 W
- Power connector
- Unknown
- Recommended PSU
- Unknown
- Bus interface
- PCIe 5.0 x16
Physical / Outputs
- Length
- Unknown
- Height
- Unknown
- Width
- Unknown
- Slot thickness
- Unknown
- Fans
- Unknown
- Cooling
- Air
- Outputs
- Unknown
Exact board / Identity
- Board part number
- RX9070GRE SLD 12GO
- Vendor warranty
- 2 years
Power / Interface
- Board power (TBP)
- 215 W
- Power connector
- Unknown
- Recommended PSU
- Unknown
- Bus interface
- PCIe 5.0 x16
Physical / Outputs
- Length
- Unknown
- Height
- Unknown
- Width
- Unknown
- Slot thickness
- Unknown
- Fans
- Unknown
- Cooling
- Air
- Outputs
- Unknown
Exact board / Identity
- Board part number
- PRIME-RX9070GRE-O12G-EVO
- Vendor warranty
- 3 years
Power / Interface
- Board power (TBP)
- 215 W
- Power connector
- Unknown
- Recommended PSU
- Unknown
- Bus interface
- PCIe 5.0 x16
Physical / Outputs
- Length
- Unknown
- Height
- Unknown
- Width
- Unknown
- Slot thickness
- Unknown
- Fans
- Unknown
- Cooling
- Air
- Outputs
- Unknown
Exact board / Identity
- Board part number
- GV-R907GREGAMING OC-12GD
- Vendor warranty
- 3 years
Select an exact version for physical dimensions and connector details.
Show all specifications
Features
- Upscaling
- FSR 4
- Frame generation
- frame generation
- Ray tracing
- Supported
Warranty & release
- Release year
- 2025
Hover any value to see where it came from: a manufacturer specification, or a figure The Comparator calculated.
Sources: Comparator offer frame 2026-10-24–2026-10-29
What to check in your build
Varies by version
The exact requirement depends on the version you select.
Varies by version
Select a board to confirm its connector and cable-clearance needs.
Varies by version
The exact requirement depends on the version you select.
Varies by version
The exact requirement depends on the version you select.
Varies by version
Slot occupancy depends on the board cooler and thickness.
Select an exact version above for physical dimensions and connector details.
550 W PSU recommended
Whole-system figure from the board vendor — it already allows for the processor and transient spikes.
2x 8-pin required
Adapters work but add connector bulk and need extra cable-bend clearance.
Needs at least 280 mm of GPU clearance
Front radiators and fans eat into the figure a case advertises.
Leave room beyond the card for the cable bend
No verified minimum is published — measure it.
Occupies 2 slots
The cooler covers the slots below it — check nothing adjacent needs that space.
550 W PSU recommended
Whole-system figure from the board vendor — it already allows for the processor and transient spikes.
2x 8-pin required
Adapters work but add connector bulk and need extra cable-bend clearance.
Needs at least 320 mm of GPU clearance
Front radiators and fans eat into the figure a case advertises.
Leave room beyond the card for the cable bend
No verified minimum is published — measure it.
Occupies 3 slots
The cooler covers the slots below it — check nothing adjacent needs that space.
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Compare all 5 board variants
| Variant | Length | Slot thickness | Power connector | Recommended PSU |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sapphire PULSE RX 9070 GRE | 280 mm | 2 | 2x 8-pin | 550 W |
| Sapphire PURE RX 9070 GRE | 320 mm | 3 | 2x 8-pin | 550 W |
| ASRock Steel Legend Radeon RX 9070 GRE 12GB | Unknown | Unknown | Unknown | Unknown |
| ASUS PRIME Radeon RX 9070 GRE EVO OC 12GB | Unknown | Unknown | Unknown | Unknown |
| GIGABYTE Gaming Radeon RX 9070 GRE OC 12GB | Unknown | Unknown | Unknown | Unknown |
Found an error? Report this specification Email the field, corrected value and an optional source.
Compatibility guidance is practical help, not a score. Missing data is shown as unknown, never invented.
Summary
RX 9070 GRE offers a balanced view across an all-round mix of priorities. It ranks #17 by capability in the current modelled field. Its clearest measured strength is raster index 1030. The main limitation appears when 3D Rendering becomes the priority, where it grades D.
RX 9070 GRE offers S-grade capability for 1080p. It ranks #17 by capability in the current modelled field. Its clearest measured strength is raster index 1030. The main limitation appears when 3D Rendering becomes the priority, where it grades D.
RX 9070 GRE offers A-grade capability for 1440p. It ranks #17 by capability in the current modelled field. Its clearest measured strength is raster index 1030. The main limitation appears when 3D Rendering becomes the priority, where it grades D.
RX 9070 GRE offers C-grade capability for 4K. It ranks #17 by capability in the current modelled field. Its clearest measured strength is raster index 1030. The C grade is the decisive limitation for this workload.
RX 9070 GRE offers B-grade capability for Ray Tracing @ 1080p. It ranks #16 by capability in the current modelled field. Its clearest measured strength is ray-tracing index 967. The main limitation appears when 3D Rendering becomes the priority, where it grades D.
RX 9070 GRE offers C-grade capability for Ray Tracing @ 1440p. It ranks #17 by capability in the current modelled field. Its clearest measured strength is ray-tracing index 967. The C grade is the decisive limitation for this workload.
RX 9070 GRE offers F-grade capability for Ray Tracing @ 4K. It ranks #18 by capability in the current modelled field. Its clearest measured strength is ray-tracing index 967. The F grade is the decisive limitation for this workload.
RX 9070 GRE offers B-grade capability for AI. It ranks #17 by capability in the current modelled field. Its clearest measured strength is ai compute index 587. The main limitation appears when 3D Rendering becomes the priority, where it grades D.
RX 9070 GRE offers D-grade capability for 3D Rendering. It ranks #28 by capability in the current modelled field. Its clearest measured strength is raster index 1030. The D grade is the decisive limitation for this workload.
RX 9070 GRE offers C-grade capability for Light Use. It ranks #20 by capability in the current modelled field. Its clearest measured strength is raster index 1030. The C grade is the decisive limitation for this workload.
FAQ
Do all RX 9070 GRE boards have the same physical design?
No. Dimensions, slot thickness, cooling, power connectors and display outputs belong to the exact board. Use the Exact version selector before checking case or PSU fit.
How much case clearance should I allow for the RX 9070 GRE?
Tracked boards range from 280 to 320 mm in length. Select the exact board, then also allow for front radiators or fans, card height, slot thickness and power-cable bend; length alone does not guarantee fit.
Why does Relative Value change when I choose another scenario?
Each scenario changes the weights applied to capability, price and the other published factors. The hardware facts stay fixed, but the value question changes, so its score and rank can change too.
Why can Amazon appear without a tracked price?
Amazon listing snapshots can participate in Value while fresh. We show Check on Amazon instead of its price; confirm the current price and availability at the store. When no current listing snapshot exists, Amazon is a search link only.
Useful links & sources
offer frame 2026-10-24–2026-10-29 · formula gpu-value-v1.4 · facts facts-2026-10-29 · Relative Value is an estimate from our current dataset, the selected weights and dated market prices — not an official product rating and not a price forecast. Target prices are calculation thresholds, not predictions. Methodology We are not a shop. Affiliate links may earn us a commission; they never change the calculations or the ranking.