RX 7600
The current RX 7600 price from retailers, its key specifications, and how it performs for each job.
AMD · GPU · RX 7000
Retailer photo of Sapphire PULSE RX 7600 OC. View this offer in Where to buy
Trade-offs: you want strong value with Balanced priorities specifically
- VRAM
- 8 GB
- Memory bandwidth
- 288 GB/s
- Board power
- 165 W
- Architecture
- RDNA 3.0
- Interface
- PCIe 4.0 x8
Move a slider and the page re-scores this product against the same market frame.
What does it cost today, and is that a good price?
Market confidence: MediumAt CAD 463 the RX 7600 is priced 20% below its CAD 582 representative market level. Only 2 verified new offers stand behind it, so the level can move quickly.
Price looks competitive: the cheapest verified offer is 20% below the current representative level.
Prices & availability
RX 7600: current price and offers
Compare the offers we track for this model, across variants and retailers.
5 tracked offers · 3 retailers
| Variant | Store | Condition | Price (snapshot) | Value · Balanced | Checked | Offer link |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ASUS ROG STRIX RX 7600 GAMING OC | ASUS | New | CAD 463 | 57 | 2026-10-29 | View offer → |
| XFX SPEEDSTER SWFT 210 RX 7600 CORE EDITION | Amazon | New | Check on Amazon | 49 | 2026-10-29 | View offer → |
| ASRock RX 7600 Challenger OC | Amazon | New | Check on Amazon | 48 | 2026-10-29 | View offer → |
| Sapphire PULSE RX 7600 OC | Newegg | New | CAD 700 | 43 | 2026-10-29 | View offer → |
| ASUS DUAL RX 7600 EVO OC | Amazon | New | Check on Amazon | 34 | 2026-10-29 | View offer → |
| RX 7600Multiple variants available | Amazon Affiliate | Varies | Find on Amazon | Not tracked | No price snapshot | Find on Amazon → |
Prices are dated snapshots, not live quotes — confirm the final price at the store. New, refurbished and used offers are listed separately; used offers carry warranty and seller risk.
Performance and where it ranks
Two different questions, side by side. Performance compares what the hardware can do; Value compares what that capability costs at today’s price. A product can rank high on one and low on the other — that gap is the point.
Performance Balanced
How much it can do. Price plays no part in this ranking.
#34 of 40 graded graphics cards
- #31 NVIDIARTX 4060 26
- #32 NVIDIARTX 5050 23
- #33 NVIDIARTX 3060 12GB 22
- #34 AMDRX 7600 21
- #35 AMDRX 6600 XT 20
- #36 NVIDIARTX A2000 19
- #37 NVIDIARTX 3050 6GB 15
Value Balanced
How much of that you get for today’s price.
#24 of 41 currently priced graphics cards
- #21 NVIDIARTX 5050 61
- #22 AMDRX 7700 XT 60
- #23 NVIDIARTX 4080 59
- #24 AMDRX 7600 57
- #25 AMDRX 7900 XTX 56
- #26 NVIDIARTX 5090 52
- #27 NVIDIARTX 4060 52
Performance 1080p
How much it can do. Price plays no part in this ranking.
#34 of 40 graded graphics cards
- #31 NVIDIARTX 4060 26
- #32 NVIDIARTX 5050 23
- #33 NVIDIARTX 3060 12GB 22
- #34 AMDRX 7600 21
- #35 AMDRX 6600 XT 20
- #36 NVIDIARTX A2000 19
- #37 NVIDIARTX 3050 6GB 15
Value 1080p
How much of that you get for today’s price.
#11 of 41 currently priced graphics cards
- #8 NVIDIARTX 4070 Super 79
- #9 NVIDIARTX 5070 75
- #10 NVIDIARTX 4070 Ti Super 74
- #11 AMDRX 7600 70
- #12 NVIDIARTX 4070 66
- #13 NVIDIARTX 5050 66
- #14 AMDRX 7800 XT 65
Performance 1440p
How much it can do. Price plays no part in this ranking.
#34 of 40 graded graphics cards
- #31 NVIDIARTX 4060 26
- #32 NVIDIARTX 5050 23
- #33 NVIDIARTX 3060 12GB 22
- #34 AMDRX 7600 21
- #35 AMDRX 6600 XT 20
- #36 NVIDIARTX A2000 19
- #37 NVIDIARTX 3050 6GB 15
Value 1440p
How much of that you get for today’s price.
#26 of 41 currently priced graphics cards
- #23 AMDRX 7900 GRE 55
- #24 AMDRX 7700 XT 47
- #25 NVIDIARTX 5050 42
- #26 AMDRX 7600 35
- #27 NVIDIARTX 4060 35
- #28 NVIDIARTX 3070 Ti 32
- #29 NVIDIARTX 3060 Ti 30
Performance 4K
How much it can do. Price plays no part in this ranking.
#34 of 40 graded graphics cards
- #31 NVIDIARTX 4060 26
- #32 NVIDIARTX 5050 23
- #33 NVIDIARTX 3060 12GB 22
- #34 AMDRX 7600 21
- #35 AMDRX 6600 XT 20
- #36 NVIDIARTX A2000 19
- #37 NVIDIARTX 3050 6GB 15
Value 4K
How much of that you get for today’s price.
#33 of 41 currently priced graphics cards
- #30 NVIDIARTX 3060 12GB 17
- #31 AMDRX 6700 XT 15
- #32 NVIDIARTX 3060 Ti 15
- #33 AMDRX 7600 14
- #34 NVIDIARTX 4060 Ti 8GB 12
- #35 NVIDIARTX 3050 8GB 9
- #36 NVIDIARTX 3050 6GB 9
Performance Ray Tracing @ 1080p
How much it can do. Price plays no part in this ranking.
#34 of 35 graded graphics cards
- #29 NVIDIARTX 3060 12GB 24
- #30 AMDRX 6700 XT 22
- #31 NVIDIARTX 3050 6GB 16
- #32 NVIDIARTX 3050 8GB 16
- #33 AMDRX 6600 XT 14
- #34 AMDRX 7600 13
- #35 AMDRX 6500 XT 4GB 7
Value Ray Tracing @ 1080p
How much of that you get for today’s price.
#30 of 41 currently priced graphics cards
- #27 NVIDIARTX 4060 33
- #28 NVIDIARTX 3070 Ti 29
- #29 NVIDIARTX 3060 Ti 25
- #30 AMDRX 7600 25
- #31 NVIDIARTX 3050 8GB 23
- #32 AMDRX 6700 XT 21
- #33 NVIDIARTX 3050 6GB 20
Performance Ray Tracing @ 1440p
How much it can do. Price plays no part in this ranking.
#33 of 35 graded graphics cards
- #29 NVIDIARTX 5050 19
- #30 AMDRX 6700 XT 18
- #31 NVIDIARTX 3050 6GB 13
- #32 NVIDIARTX 3050 8GB 13
- #33 AMDRX 7600 9
- #34 AMDRX 6600 XT 9
- #35 AMDRX 6500 XT 4GB 4
Value Ray Tracing @ 1440p
How much of that you get for today’s price.
#30 of 41 currently priced graphics cards
- #27 NVIDIARTX 4060 28
- #28 NVIDIARTX 3070 Ti 26
- #29 NVIDIARTX 3060 Ti 21
- #30 AMDRX 7600 21
- #31 NVIDIARTX 3050 8GB 19
- #32 AMDRX 6700 XT 19
- #33 NVIDIARTX 3050 6GB 16
Performance Ray Tracing @ 4K
How much it can do. Price plays no part in this ranking.
#33 of 35 graded graphics cards
- #29 NVIDIARTX 4060 11
- #30 NVIDIARTX 5050 10
- #31 NVIDIARTX 3050 6GB 7
- #32 NVIDIARTX 3050 8GB 7
- #33 AMDRX 7600 6
- #34 AMDRX 6600 XT 5
- #35 AMDRX 6500 XT 4GB 2
Value Ray Tracing @ 4K
How much of that you get for today’s price.
#32 of 41 currently priced graphics cards
- #29 AMDRX 6700 XT 14
- #30 NVIDIARTX 3060 Ti 11
- #31 NVIDIARTX 3050 8GB 10
- #32 AMDRX 7600 10
- #33 NVIDIARTX 3050 6GB 7
- #34 IntelIntel Arc Pro B70 6
- #35 AMDRX 6600 XT 6
Performance AI
How much it can do. Price plays no part in this ranking.
#36 of 39 graded graphics cards
- #33 NVIDIARTX 5050 6
- #34 NVIDIAGTX 1650 6
- #35 IntelIntel Arc Pro B70 5
- #36 AMDRX 7600 5
- #37 AMDRX 6700 XT 3
- #38 AMDRX 6600 XT 3
- #39 AMDRX 6500 XT 4GB 1
Value AI
How much of that you get for today’s price.
#36 of 41 currently priced graphics cards
- #33 NVIDIARTX 3050 6GB 6
- #34 NVIDIARTX 5050 5
- #35 NVIDIARTX 4060 4
- #36 AMDRX 7600 4
- #37 NVIDIARTX A2000 3
- #38 NVIDIAGTX 1650 2
- #39 AMDRX 6700 XT 2
Performance 3D Rendering
How much it can do. Price plays no part in this ranking.
#37 of 37 graded graphics cards
- #31 NVIDIARTX A2000 14
- #32 NVIDIARTX 3050 6GB 11
- #33 NVIDIARTX 3050 8GB 11
- #34 AMDRX 9060 XT 16GB 11
- #35 AMDRX 9060 XT 8GB 11
- #36 AMDRX 6700 XT 10
- #37 AMDRX 7600 8
Value 3D Rendering
How much of that you get for today’s price.
#34 of 41 currently priced graphics cards
- #31 NVIDIARTX 3050 8GB 7
- #32 NVIDIARTX 5050 6
- #33 NVIDIARTX 4060 6
- #34 AMDRX 7600 5
- #35 IntelIntel Arc Pro B70 5
- #36 NVIDIARTX PRO 4500 Blackwell 5
- #37 NVIDIAGTX 1650 3
Performance Light Use
How much it can do. Price plays no part in this ranking.
#14 of 39 graded graphics cards
- #11 AMDRX 9060 XT 16GB 78
- #12 NVIDIARTX 4060 Ti 8GB 78
- #13 AMDRX 6600 XT 78
- #14 AMDRX 7600 77
- #15 NVIDIARTX 3060 12GB 76
- #16 NVIDIARTX 5060 Ti 8GB 73
- #17 NVIDIARTX 5060 Ti 16GB 73
Value Light Use
How much of that you get for today’s price.
#8 of 41 currently priced graphics cards
- #5 AMDRX 9060 XT 8GB 63
- #6 AMDRX 9060 XT 16GB 61
- #7 AMDRX 6500 XT 4GB 58
- #8 AMDRX 7600 57
- #9 NVIDIARTX 4060 52
- #10 NVIDIARTX 5060 Ti 8GB 52
- #11 NVIDIARTX A2000 47
These ladders follow the preset scenario shown above. Your own weights re-score this product, not the whole field.
What it is good for
| Scenario | this productCapability grade · Value at current price | Higher capability |
|---|---|---|
| Balanced (all-round)Weighted all-round view | GradeNo grade Value57 | — |
| 1080p GamingRaster performance · 1080p | GradeB Value70 | — |
| 1440p GamingRaster performance · 1440p | GradeC Value35 | — |
| 4K / VRRaster performance · 4K / VR | GradeF Value14 | — |
| Ray Tracing @ 1080pRay tracing capability · 1080p | GradeF Value25 | — |
| Ray Tracing @ 1440pRay tracing capability · 1440p | GradeF Value21 | — |
| Ray Tracing @ 4KRay tracing capability · 4K | GradeF Value10 | — |
| AI / Local LLMAI compute · memory and ecosystem fit | GradeD Value4 | Higher capability GTX 1650 F 2 +7% capability · -55% price |
| 3D Rendering3D rendering · creator workloads | GradeF Value5 | — |
| Light Use & EfficiencyEfficiency · lighter workloads | GradeB Value57 | Higher capability Higher capability · Higher Value with current priorities GTX 1650 B 93 +29% capability · -55% price |
Balanced has no letter: it is a weighting preset, not a capability rubric. A grade answers “how well does this handle that job?” — price is never part of it. Relative Value puts the current market price back in.
Compare these grades with the full tier list
Browse shortlists for different uses
Trade-offs
Works well if
- 1080p Gaming is your main prioritygraded B for 1080p Gaming on the same rubric as the tier list
- You want memory headroom — memory is not what limits it hereno memory cap applies to this grade — the raster index sets it, not the frame buffer
- FSR 3.1 with frame generation matters to youtemporal upscaler + frame generation, not ML-based — derived from the rdna3 architecture, not from a scraped feature flag
Consider other options if
- You want strong value with Balanced priorities specificallyat today's market no realistic price for this model reaches strong value with Balanced priorities — the calculation only gets there near CAD 289, against a cheapest tracked CAD 463
- Not the pick if 4K / VR is your main useit grades only F there
Works well if
- 1080p is your main priority — B here means solid 60 fps at high settingsgraded B for 1080p on the same rubric as the tier list
- Strong-value threshold: ~CAD 406CAD 406 is where Relative Value reaches 80 for 1080p, in the 2026-10-24–2026-10-29 offer frame
- You want memory headroom — memory is not what limits it hereno memory cap applies to this grade for 1080p — the raster index sets it, not the frame buffer
Consider other options if
- Current price sits CAD 57 above the strong-value threshold (~CAD 406)cheapest tracked CAD 463 against a CAD 406 calculated threshold for 1080p
- Not the pick if 4K / VR is your main useit grades only F there
For the selected scenario this is not a strong fit — the grade above is the reason, and the models below suit it better.
Works well if
- 1440p is not actually your main job — 1080p Gaming isit grades C for 1440p, but B for 1080p Gaming
Consider other options if
- Not the pick if 1440p is your main useit grades only C there
- You want strong value for 1440p specificallyat today's market no realistic price for this model reaches strong value for 1440p — the calculation only gets there near CAD 152, against a cheapest tracked CAD 463
For the selected scenario this is not a strong fit — the grade above is the reason, and the models below suit it better.
Works well if
- 4K is not actually your main job — 1080p Gaming isit grades F for 4K, but B for 1080p Gaming
Consider other options if
- Not the pick if 4K is your main useit grades only F there
- You want strong value for 4K specificallycompeting products deliver so much more for 4K per dollar that no price this model realistically trades at reaches the strong-value mark for this job
For the selected scenario this is not a strong fit — the grade above is the reason, and the models below suit it better.
Works well if
- Ray Tracing @ 1080p is not actually your main job — 1080p Gaming isit grades F for Ray Tracing @ 1080p, but B for 1080p Gaming
Consider other options if
- Not the pick if Ray Tracing @ 1080p is your main useit grades only F there
- You want strong value for Ray Tracing @ 1080p specificallycompeting products deliver so much more for Ray Tracing @ 1080p per dollar that no price this model realistically trades at reaches the strong-value mark for this job
For the selected scenario this is not a strong fit — the grade above is the reason, and the models below suit it better.
Works well if
- Ray Tracing @ 1440p is not actually your main job — 1080p Gaming isit grades F for Ray Tracing @ 1440p, but B for 1080p Gaming
Consider other options if
- Not the pick if Ray Tracing @ 1440p is your main useit grades only F there
- You want strong value for Ray Tracing @ 1440p specificallycompeting products deliver so much more for Ray Tracing @ 1440p per dollar that no price this model realistically trades at reaches the strong-value mark for this job
For the selected scenario this is not a strong fit — the grade above is the reason, and the models below suit it better.
Works well if
- Ray Tracing @ 4K is not actually your main job — 1080p Gaming isit grades F for Ray Tracing @ 4K, but B for 1080p Gaming
Consider other options if
- Not the pick if Ray Tracing @ 4K is your main useit grades only F there
- You want strong value for Ray Tracing @ 4K specificallycompeting products deliver so much more for Ray Tracing @ 4K per dollar that no price this model realistically trades at reaches the strong-value mark for this job
For the selected scenario this is not a strong fit — the grade above is the reason, and the models below suit it better.
Works well if
- AI is not actually your main job — 1080p Gaming isit grades D for AI, but B for 1080p Gaming
Consider other options if
- Not the pick if AI is your main useit grades D there; GTX 1650 grades F at CAD 210
- You want strong value for AI specificallycompeting products deliver so much more for AI per dollar that no price this model realistically trades at reaches the strong-value mark for this job
For the selected scenario this is not a strong fit — the grade above is the reason, and the models below suit it better.
Works well if
- 3D Rendering is not actually your main job — 1080p Gaming isit grades F for 3D Rendering, but B for 1080p Gaming
Consider other options if
- Not the pick if 3D Rendering is your main useit grades only F there
- You want strong value for 3D Rendering specificallycompeting products deliver so much more for 3D Rendering per dollar that no price this model realistically trades at reaches the strong-value mark for this job
Works well if
- Light Use is your main prioritygraded B for Light Use on the same rubric as the tier list
- You want memory headroom — memory is not what limits it hereno memory cap applies to this grade for Light Use — the raster index sets it, not the frame buffer
- FSR 3.1 with frame generation matters to youtemporal upscaler + frame generation, not ML-based — derived from the rdna3 architecture, not from a scraped feature flag
Consider other options if
- You want strong value for Light Use specificallyat today's market no realistic price for this model reaches strong value for Light Use — the calculation only gets there near CAD 294, against a cheapest tracked CAD 463
- Value for money matters more to you than this exact modelGTX 1650 holds Relative Value 93 against its 57 for Light Use, at CAD 210
- Not the pick if 4K / VR is your main useit grades only F there
Every line states the fact it was derived from, for the scenario selected above. Thresholds are calculated points on our value curve — information about where the maths turns, not instructions about what to pay.
Similar options to the RX 7600
Chosen for Balanced
Chosen for 1080p
Chosen for 1440p
Chosen for 4K
Chosen for Ray Tracing @ 1080p
Chosen for Ray Tracing @ 1440p
Chosen for Ray Tracing @ 4K
Chosen for AI
This scenario carries a requirement candidates are checked against first: CUDA — Many local-LLM and diffusion toolchains are CUDA-only. ROCm and Vulkan builds exist and work, but they are not drop-in — check your toolchain before treating a non-NVIDIA card as an equivalent swap.
Chosen for 3D Rendering
This scenario carries a requirement candidates are checked against first: OptiX — Blender Cycles reaches its fastest path on NVIDIA OptiX. HIP (AMD) and oneAPI (Intel) render the same scenes, so this is a workflow question, not a capability wall — but render times and add-on support differ.
Chosen for Light Use
Alternatives stay near this product’s price range. Step-up options may exceed the standard budget envelope when the capability gain is meaningful.
More head-to-head comparisons in this category
Upgrade planner
Judge the change in the active scenario, then make the cash gap explicit.
Using page scenarioWhat are you upgrading from? These are the axes we compare on, and where this product stands in the current market.
We rank upgrades by out-of-pocket cost — the new price minus what yours is worth — not by sticker price.
Only candidates that clear the configured meaningful-upgrade gate will be shown; roles are omitted rather than filled.
Capability differences are expressed as tiers and index points, not as benchmark percentages we did not measure.
Specifications and compatibility
What this product is, and what to check before it goes into your build.
Core / Performance
- Architecture
- RDNA 3.0
- GPU chip
- Navi 33
- GPU variant
- Navi 33 XL (215-163000057)
- Process node
- 6 nm
- Transistors
- 13,300 million
- Shading units
- 2048
Memory
Power / Interface
- Board power (TBP)
- 165 W
- Power connector
- Varies by version
- Recommended PSU
- Varies by version
- Bus interface
- PCIe 4.0 x8
Physical / Outputs
- Length
- Varies by version229–281 mm across tracked variants
- Height
- Varies by version107–135 mm across tracked variants
- Width
- Varies by version
- Slot thickness
- Varies by version2–3 across tracked variants
- Fans
- Varies by version1–3 across tracked variants
- Cooling
- Varies by version
- Outputs
- Varies by version
Power / Interface
- Board power (TBP)
- 165 W
- Power connector
- 1x 8-pin
- Recommended PSU
- 450 W
- Bus interface
- PCIe 4.0 x8
Physical / Outputs
- Length
- 269 mm
- Height
- 132 mm
- Width
- Unknown
- Slot thickness
- 2 slots
- Fans
- 1
- Cooling
- Air
- Outputs
- 3× DisplayPort · 1× HDMI
Exact board / Identity
- Board part number
- RX 7600 CL 8GO
- Vendor warranty
- 2 years
Power / Interface
- Board power (TBP)
- 165 W
- Power connector
- 1x 8-pin
- Recommended PSU
- 450 W
- Bus interface
- PCIe 4.0 x8
Physical / Outputs
- Length
- 229 mm
- Height
- 123 mm
- Width
- Unknown
- Slot thickness
- 2 slots
- Fans
- 2
- Cooling
- Air
- Outputs
- 3× DisplayPort · 1× HDMI
Exact board / Identity
- Board part number
- DUAL-RX7600-O8G-EVO
- Vendor warranty
- 3 years
Power / Interface
- Board power (TBP)
- 165 W
- Power connector
- 1x 8-pin
- Recommended PSU
- 450 W
- Bus interface
- PCIe 4.0 x8
Physical / Outputs
- Length
- 281 mm
- Height
- 135 mm
- Width
- Unknown
- Slot thickness
- 3 slots
- Fans
- 3
- Cooling
- Air
- Outputs
- 3× DisplayPort · 1× HDMI
Exact board / Identity
- Board part number
- ROG-STRIX-RX7600-O8G-GAMING
- Vendor warranty
- 3 years
Power / Interface
- Board power (TBP)
- 165 W
- Power connector
- 1x 8-pin
- Recommended PSU
- 450 W
- Bus interface
- PCIe 4.0 x8
Physical / Outputs
- Length
- 240 mm
- Height
- 107 mm
- Width
- Unknown
- Slot thickness
- 2 slots
- Fans
- 2
- Cooling
- Air
- Outputs
- 3× DisplayPort · 1× HDMI
Exact board / Identity
- Board part number
- 11324-01-20G
- Vendor warranty
- 2 years
Power / Interface
- Board power (TBP)
- 165 W
- Power connector
- 1x 8-pin
- Recommended PSU
- 450 W
- Bus interface
- PCIe 4.0 x8
Physical / Outputs
- Length
- 241 mm
- Height
- 131 mm
- Width
- Unknown
- Slot thickness
- 2 slots
- Fans
- 2
- Cooling
- Air
- Outputs
- 3× DisplayPort · 1× HDMI
Exact board / Identity
- Board part number
- RX-76PSWFTFY
- Vendor warranty
- 3 years
Select an exact version for physical dimensions and connector details.
Show all specifications
Core / Performance
- Texture units
- 128
- ROPs
- 64
- Ray tracing cores
- 32
- Tensor cores
- 0
- Base clock
- 1876 MHz
- Boost clock
- 2754 MHz
Features
- Upscaling
- FSR 3.1
- Frame generation
- frame generation
- Ray tracing
- Supported
- Dual BIOS
- Yes
- RGB lighting
- Yes
Warranty & release
- Release year
- 2023
Hover any value to see where it came from: a manufacturer specification, or a figure The Comparator calculated.
Sources: Comparator offer frame 2026-10-24–2026-10-29
What to check in your build
Varies by version
The exact requirement depends on the version you select.
Varies by version
Select a board to confirm its connector and cable-clearance needs.
Varies by version
The exact requirement depends on the version you select.
Varies by version
The exact requirement depends on the version you select.
Varies by version
Slot occupancy depends on the board cooler and thickness.
Select an exact version above for physical dimensions and connector details.
450 W PSU recommended
Whole-system figure from the board vendor — it already allows for the processor and transient spikes.
1x 8-pin required
Adapters work but add connector bulk and need extra cable-bend clearance.
Needs at least 269 mm of GPU clearance
Front radiators and fans eat into the figure a case advertises.
Leave room beyond the card for the cable bend
No verified minimum is published — measure it.
Occupies 2 slots
The cooler covers the slots below it — check nothing adjacent needs that space.
450 W PSU recommended
Whole-system figure from the board vendor — it already allows for the processor and transient spikes.
1x 8-pin required
Adapters work but add connector bulk and need extra cable-bend clearance.
Needs at least 229 mm of GPU clearance
Front radiators and fans eat into the figure a case advertises.
Leave room beyond the card for the cable bend
No verified minimum is published — measure it.
Occupies 2 slots
The cooler covers the slots below it — check nothing adjacent needs that space.
450 W PSU recommended
Whole-system figure from the board vendor — it already allows for the processor and transient spikes.
1x 8-pin required
Adapters work but add connector bulk and need extra cable-bend clearance.
Needs at least 281 mm of GPU clearance
Front radiators and fans eat into the figure a case advertises.
Leave room beyond the card for the cable bend
No verified minimum is published — measure it.
Occupies 3 slots
The cooler covers the slots below it — check nothing adjacent needs that space.
450 W PSU recommended
Whole-system figure from the board vendor — it already allows for the processor and transient spikes.
1x 8-pin required
Adapters work but add connector bulk and need extra cable-bend clearance.
Needs at least 240 mm of GPU clearance
Front radiators and fans eat into the figure a case advertises.
Leave room beyond the card for the cable bend
No verified minimum is published — measure it.
Occupies 2 slots
The cooler covers the slots below it — check nothing adjacent needs that space.
450 W PSU recommended
Whole-system figure from the board vendor — it already allows for the processor and transient spikes.
1x 8-pin required
Adapters work but add connector bulk and need extra cable-bend clearance.
Needs at least 241 mm of GPU clearance
Front radiators and fans eat into the figure a case advertises.
Leave room beyond the card for the cable bend
No verified minimum is published — measure it.
Occupies 2 slots
The cooler covers the slots below it — check nothing adjacent needs that space.
Compare all 5 board variants
| Variant | Length | Slot thickness | Power connector | Recommended PSU |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ASRock RX 7600 Challenger OC | 269 mm | 2 | 1x 8-pin | 450 W |
| ASUS DUAL RX 7600 EVO OC | 229 mm | 2 | 1x 8-pin | 450 W |
| ASUS ROG STRIX RX 7600 GAMING OC | 281 mm | 3 | 1x 8-pin | 450 W |
| Sapphire PULSE RX 7600 OC | 240 mm | 2 | 1x 8-pin | 450 W |
| XFX SPEEDSTER SWFT 210 RX 7600 CORE EDITION | 241 mm | 2 | 1x 8-pin | 450 W |
Found an error? Report this specification Email the field, corrected value and an optional source.
Compatibility guidance is practical help, not a score. Missing data is shown as unknown, never invented.
Summary
RX 7600 offers a balanced view across an all-round mix of priorities. It ranks #34 by capability in the current modelled field. Its clearest measured strength is raster index 490. The main limitation appears when 4K / VR becomes the priority, where it grades F.
RX 7600 offers B-grade capability for 1080p. It ranks #34 by capability in the current modelled field. Its clearest measured strength is raster index 490. The main limitation appears when 4K / VR becomes the priority, where it grades F.
RX 7600 offers C-grade capability for 1440p. It ranks #34 by capability in the current modelled field. Its clearest measured strength is raster index 490. The C grade is the decisive limitation for this workload.
RX 7600 offers F-grade capability for 4K. It ranks #34 by capability in the current modelled field. Its clearest measured strength is raster index 490. The F grade is the decisive limitation for this workload.
RX 7600 offers F-grade capability for Ray Tracing @ 1080p. It ranks #34 by capability in the current modelled field. Its clearest measured strength is ray-tracing index 275. The F grade is the decisive limitation for this workload.
RX 7600 offers F-grade capability for Ray Tracing @ 1440p. It ranks #33 by capability in the current modelled field. Its clearest measured strength is ray-tracing index 275. The F grade is the decisive limitation for this workload.
RX 7600 offers F-grade capability for Ray Tracing @ 4K. It ranks #33 by capability in the current modelled field. Its clearest measured strength is ray-tracing index 275. The F grade is the decisive limitation for this workload.
RX 7600 offers D-grade capability for AI. It ranks #36 by capability in the current modelled field. Its clearest measured strength is ai compute index 187. The D grade is the decisive limitation for this workload.
RX 7600 offers F-grade capability for 3D Rendering. It ranks #37 by capability in the current modelled field. Its clearest measured strength is raster index 490. The F grade is the decisive limitation for this workload.
RX 7600 offers B-grade capability for Light Use. It ranks #14 by capability in the current modelled field. Its clearest measured strength is raster index 490. The main limitation appears when 4K / VR becomes the priority, where it grades F.
FAQ
Do all RX 7600 boards have the same physical design?
No. Dimensions, slot thickness, cooling, power connectors and display outputs belong to the exact board. Use the Exact version selector before checking case or PSU fit.
How much case clearance should I allow for the RX 7600?
Tracked boards range from 229 to 281 mm in length. Select the exact board, then also allow for front radiators or fans, card height, slot thickness and power-cable bend; length alone does not guarantee fit.
Why does Relative Value change when I choose another scenario?
Each scenario changes the weights applied to capability, price and the other published factors. The hardware facts stay fixed, but the value question changes, so its score and rank can change too.
Why can Amazon appear without a tracked price?
Amazon listing snapshots can participate in Value while fresh. We show Check on Amazon instead of its price; confirm the current price and availability at the store. When no current listing snapshot exists, Amazon is a search link only.
Useful links & sources
offer frame 2026-10-24–2026-10-29 · formula gpu-value-v1.4 · facts facts-2026-10-29 · Relative Value is an estimate from our current dataset, the selected weights and dated market prices — not an official product rating and not a price forecast. Target prices are calculation thresholds, not predictions. Methodology We are not a shop. Affiliate links may earn us a commission; they never change the calculations or the ranking.