RTX 5070
The current RTX 5070 price from retailers, its key specifications, and how it performs for each job.
NVIDIA · GPU · RTX 50
Retailer photo of ASUS DUAL RTX 5070 OC Edition. View this offer in Where to buy
Works well for: 1080p Gaming, 1440p Gaming, Ray Tracing @ 1080p
Trade-offs: Value for money matters more to you than this exact model
- VRAM
- 12 GB
- Memory bandwidth
- 672 GB/s
- Board power
- 250 W
- Architecture
- Blackwell 2.0
- Interface
- PCIe 5.0 x16
Move a slider and the page re-scores this product against the same market frame.
What does it cost today, and is that a good price?
Market confidence: HighAt CAD 1160 the RTX 5070 is priced 7% below its CAD 1245 representative market level. RX 9070 currently does the same job for CAD 990.
Worth putting side by side:Compare with RX 9070
Prices & availability
RTX 5070: current price and offers
Compare the offers we track for this model, across variants and retailers.
8 tracked offers · 3 retailers
| Variant | Store | Condition | Price (snapshot) | Value · Balanced | Checked | Offer link |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ASUS DUAL RTX 5070 OC Edition | Newegg | New | CAD 1,160 | 81 | 2026-10-29 | View offer → |
| MSI RTX 5070 SHADOW 3X OC | Newegg | New | CAD 1,180 | 80 | 2026-10-29 | View offer → |
| ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 5070 OC Edition 12GB | ASUS | New | CAD 1,190 | 80 | 2026-10-29 | View offer → |
| Gigabyte AORUS GeForce RTX 5070 INFINITY 12G | Newegg | New | CAD 1,300 | 75 | 2026-10-29 | View offer → |
| ASUS TUF Gaming RTX 5070 OC Edition | Amazon | New | Check on Amazon | 73 | 2026-10-29 | View offer → |
| RTX 5070Multiple variants available | Amazon Affiliate | Varies | Find on Amazon | Not tracked | No price snapshot | Find on Amazon → |
Prices are dated snapshots, not live quotes — confirm the final price at the store. New, refurbished and used offers are listed separately; used offers carry warranty and seller risk.
Show the other 3 tracked offers
| Variant | Store | Condition | Price (snapshot) | Value · Balanced | Checked | Offer link |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GIGABYTE RTX 5070 WINDFORCE SFF | Newegg | New | CAD 2,400 | 49 | 2026-10-29 | View offer → |
| ASUS DUAL RTX 5070 | Newegg | New | CAD 2,500 | 47 | 2026-10-29 | View offer → |
| ASUS DUAL RTX 5070 OC Edition | Newegg | Refurbished | CAD 1,400 | 69 | 2026-10-28 | View offer → |
Performance and where it ranks
Two different questions, side by side. Performance compares what the hardware can do; Value compares what that capability costs at today’s price. A product can rank high on one and low on the other — that gap is the point.
Performance Balanced
How much it can do. Price plays no part in this ranking.
#12 of 40 graded graphics cards
- #9 NVIDIARTX 5070 Ti 59
- #10 AMDRX 7900 XT 57
- #11 NVIDIARTX 4070 Ti Super 57
- #12 NVIDIARTX 5070 51
- #13 NVIDIARTX 4070 Ti 51
- #14 AMDRX 9070 50
- #15 NVIDIARTX 4070 Super 49
Value Balanced
How much of that you get for today’s price.
#8 of 41 currently priced graphics cards
- #5 AMDRX 9060 XT 8GB 85
- #6 NVIDIARTX 4070 Ti Super 84
- #7 NVIDIARTX 4070 Super 83
- #8 NVIDIARTX 5070 81
- #9 NVIDIARTX 4080 Super 77
- #10 NVIDIARTX 5070 Ti 76
- #11 NVIDIARTX 5060 Ti 8GB 76
Performance 1080p
How much it can do. Price plays no part in this ranking.
#12 of 40 graded graphics cards
- #9 NVIDIARTX 5070 Ti 59
- #10 AMDRX 7900 XT 57
- #11 NVIDIARTX 4070 Ti Super 57
- #12 NVIDIARTX 5070 51
- #13 NVIDIARTX 4070 Ti 51
- #14 AMDRX 9070 50
- #15 NVIDIARTX 4070 Super 49
Value 1080p
How much of that you get for today’s price.
#9 of 41 currently priced graphics cards
- #6 NVIDIARTX 5060 Ti 8GB 81
- #7 NVIDIARTX 5060 80
- #8 NVIDIARTX 4070 Super 79
- #9 NVIDIARTX 5070 75
- #10 NVIDIARTX 4070 Ti Super 74
- #11 AMDRX 7600 70
- #12 NVIDIARTX 4070 66
Performance 1440p
How much it can do. Price plays no part in this ranking.
#12 of 40 graded graphics cards
- #9 NVIDIARTX 5070 Ti 59
- #10 AMDRX 7900 XT 57
- #11 NVIDIARTX 4070 Ti Super 57
- #12 NVIDIARTX 5070 51
- #13 NVIDIARTX 4070 Ti 51
- #14 AMDRX 9070 50
- #15 NVIDIARTX 4070 Super 49
Value 1440p
How much of that you get for today’s price.
#9 of 41 currently priced graphics cards
- #6 NVIDIARTX 4080 Super 76
- #7 NVIDIARTX 4090 75
- #8 NVIDIARTX 5070 Ti 75
- #9 NVIDIARTX 5070 75
- #10 NVIDIARTX 4070 Super 74
- #11 NVIDIARTX 5080 72
- #12 AMDRX 9060 XT 8GB 66
Performance 4K
How much it can do. Price plays no part in this ranking.
#12 of 40 graded graphics cards
- #9 NVIDIARTX 5070 Ti 59
- #10 AMDRX 7900 XT 57
- #11 NVIDIARTX 4070 Ti Super 57
- #12 NVIDIARTX 5070 51
- #13 NVIDIARTX 4070 Ti 51
- #14 AMDRX 9070 50
- #15 NVIDIARTX 4070 Super 49
Value 4K
How much of that you get for today’s price.
#10 of 41 currently priced graphics cards
- #7 AMDRX 9070 64
- #8 NVIDIARTX 4070 Ti Super 64
- #9 AMDRX 7900 XTX 57
- #10 NVIDIARTX 5070 54
- #11 AMDRX 7900 XT 52
- #12 AMDRX 9060 XT 16GB 52
- #13 NVIDIARTX 4080 51
Performance Ray Tracing @ 1080p
How much it can do. Price plays no part in this ranking.
#10 of 35 graded graphics cards
- #7 NVIDIARTX 4070 Ti Super 70
- #8 NVIDIARTX 4070 Ti 62
- #9 AMDRX 9070 XT 62
- #10 NVIDIARTX 5070 59
- #11 NVIDIARTX 4070 Super 58
- #12 AMDRX 7900 XTX 56
- #13 AMDRX 9070 54
Value Ray Tracing @ 1080p
How much of that you get for today’s price.
#6 of 41 currently priced graphics cards
- #3 NVIDIARTX 4080 Super 80
- #4 AMDRX 9070 GRE 80
- #5 NVIDIARTX 4070 Ti Super 80
- #6 NVIDIARTX 5070 79
- #7 NVIDIARTX 5070 Ti 77
- #8 NVIDIARTX 5080 76
- #9 NVIDIARTX 4070 Super 76
Performance Ray Tracing @ 1440p
How much it can do. Price plays no part in this ranking.
#10 of 35 graded graphics cards
- #7 NVIDIARTX 4070 Ti Super 60
- #8 AMDRX 9070 XT 55
- #9 NVIDIARTX 4070 Ti 55
- #10 NVIDIARTX 5070 51
- #11 AMDRX 7900 XTX 50
- #12 AMDRX 9070 47
- #13 NVIDIARTX 4070 Super 43
Value Ray Tracing @ 1440p
How much of that you get for today’s price.
#8 of 41 currently priced graphics cards
- #5 NVIDIARTX 5080 77
- #6 NVIDIARTX 5070 Ti 77
- #7 NVIDIARTX 4090 75
- #8 NVIDIARTX 5070 75
- #9 AMDRX 9070 GRE 75
- #10 NVIDIARTX 4070 Super 71
- #11 NVIDIARTX 5090 71
Performance Ray Tracing @ 4K
How much it can do. Price plays no part in this ranking.
#13 of 35 graded graphics cards
- #10 AMDRX 9070 40
- #11 NVIDIARTX 4070 Ti 37
- #12 AMDRX 7900 XT 36
- #13 NVIDIARTX 5070 35
- #14 NVIDIARTX 4070 Super 34
- #15 NVIDIARTX 5060 Ti 16GB 32
- #16 NVIDIARTX 4070 30
Value Ray Tracing @ 4K
How much of that you get for today’s price.
#9 of 41 currently priced graphics cards
- #6 NVIDIARTX 5070 Ti 61
- #7 AMDRX 9070 60
- #8 NVIDIARTX 4070 Ti Super 58
- #9 NVIDIARTX 5070 51
- #10 NVIDIARTX 4080 49
- #11 NVIDIARTX 4070 Super 46
- #12 AMDRX 7900 XTX 45
Performance AI
How much it can do. Price plays no part in this ranking.
#11 of 39 graded graphics cards
- #8 NVIDIARTX PRO 4000 Blackwell 38
- #9 NVIDIARTX 4070 Ti 38
- #10 NVIDIARTX 4070 Super 34
- #11 NVIDIARTX 5070 29
- #12 NVIDIARTX 4070 28
- #13 AMDRX 9070 XT 23
- #14 NVIDIARTX 4060 Ti 8GB 21
Value AI
How much of that you get for today’s price.
#12 of 41 currently priced graphics cards
- #9 NVIDIARTX 4070 Super 28
- #10 NVIDIARTX 4070 Ti 25
- #11 AMDRX 9070 XT 25
- #12 NVIDIARTX 5070 24
- #13 NVIDIARTX 4070 21
- #14 AMDRX 9070 19
- #15 AMDRX 9070 GRE 16
Performance 3D Rendering
How much it can do. Price plays no part in this ranking.
#10 of 37 graded graphics cards
- #7 NVIDIARTX 4070 Ti 49
- #8 NVIDIARTX 4070 Ti Super 46
- #9 NVIDIARTX PRO 4000 Blackwell 42
- #10 NVIDIARTX 5070 41
- #11 NVIDIARTX 4070 41
- #12 NVIDIARTX 4070 Super 40
- #13 NVIDIARTX 4060 Ti 8GB 28
Value 3D Rendering
How much of that you get for today’s price.
#11 of 41 currently priced graphics cards
- #8 NVIDIARTX 4070 Super 42
- #9 NVIDIARTX 4070 Ti 38
- #10 AMDRX 9070 XT 37
- #11 NVIDIARTX 5070 36
- #12 NVIDIARTX 4070 31
- #13 AMDRX 9070 27
- #14 NVIDIARTX PRO 4000 Blackwell 24
Performance Light Use
How much it can do. Price plays no part in this ranking.
#26 of 39 graded graphics cards
- #23 AMDRX 6700 XT 61
- #24 IntelIntel Arc Pro B70 61
- #25 AMDRX 7700 XT 57
- #26 NVIDIARTX 5070 56
- #27 AMDRX 7900 GRE 54
- #28 AMDRX 7800 XT 53
- #29 NVIDIARTX 4070 Ti 48
Value Light Use
How much of that you get for today’s price.
#17 of 41 currently priced graphics cards
- #14 NVIDIARTX 5060 Ti 16GB 40
- #15 AMDRX 9070 39
- #16 NVIDIARTX 4070 Super 33
- #17 NVIDIARTX 5070 31
- #18 NVIDIARTX 4070 31
- #19 NVIDIARTX 4060 Ti 8GB 31
- #20 AMDRX 9070 XT 28
These ladders follow the preset scenario shown above. Your own weights re-score this product, not the whole field.
What it is good for
| Scenario | this productCapability grade · Value at current price | Higher capability | Higher Value with current priorities |
|---|---|---|---|
| Balanced (all-round)Weighted all-round view | GradeNo grade Value81 | Higher capability Higher capability · Higher Value with current priorities RX 9070 XT 100 +16% capability · -5% price | |
| 1080p GamingRaster performance · 1080p | GradeS Value75 | Higher capability Higher capability · Higher Value with current priorities RX 9070 XT S 93 +16% capability · -5% price | |
| 1440p GamingRaster performance · 1440p | GradeA Value75 | Higher capability Higher capability · Higher Value with current priorities RX 9070 XT S 100 +16% capability · -5% price | |
| 4K / VRRaster performance · 4K / VR | GradeB Value54 | Higher capability Higher capability · Higher Value with current priorities RX 9070 XT A 77 +16% capability · -5% price | |
| Ray Tracing @ 1080pRay tracing capability · 1080p | GradeA Value79 | Higher capability RTX 4070 Ti Super A 80 +19% capability · +11% price | Higher Value with current priorities RX 9070 XT A 100 +5% capability · -5% price |
| Ray Tracing @ 1440pRay tracing capability · 1440p | GradeB Value75 | Higher capability RTX 4070 Ti Super A 79 +17% capability · +11% price | Higher Value with current priorities RX 9070 XT B 100 +8% capability · -5% price |
| Ray Tracing @ 4KRay tracing capability · 4K | GradeD Value51 | Higher capability RTX 4070 Ti Super C 58 +42% capability · +11% price | Higher Value with current priorities RX 9070 XT C 71 +33% capability · -5% price |
| AI / Local LLMAI compute · memory and ecosystem fit | GradeB Value24 | Higher capability RTX 4070 Ti Super A 40 +43% capability · +11% price | Higher Value with current priorities RTX 4070 Super B 28 +15% capability · -12% price |
| 3D Rendering3D rendering · creator workloads | GradeA Value36 | Higher capability RTX 4070 Ti Super A 56 +11% capability · +11% price | Higher Value with current priorities RTX 4070 Super B 42 -4% capability · -12% price |
| Light Use & EfficiencyEfficiency · lighter workloads | GradeC Value31 | Higher capability Higher capability · Higher Value with current priorities RTX 3050 6GB S 100 +78% capability · -48% price | |
Balanced has no letter: it is a weighting preset, not a capability rubric. A grade answers “how well does this handle that job?” — price is never part of it. Relative Value puts the current market price back in.
Compare these grades with the full tier list
Browse shortlists for different uses
Trade-offs
Works well if
- 1080p Gaming is your main prioritygraded S for 1080p Gaming on the same rubric as the tier list
- Today's price already clears the strong-value markcheapest tracked CAD 1160 against a CAD 1180 threshold with Balanced priorities
- You want memory headroom — memory is not what limits it hereno memory cap applies to this grade — the raster index sets it, not the frame buffer
Consider other options if
- Value for money matters more to you than this exact modelRX 9070 XT holds Relative Value 100 against its 81 with Balanced priorities, at CAD 1100
- Not the pick if Light Use & Efficiency is your main useit grades only C there
Works well if
- 1080p is your main priority — S here means 144 Hz+ ultra with headroomgraded S for 1080p on the same rubric as the tier list
- Strong-value threshold: ~CAD 1088CAD 1088 is where Relative Value reaches 80 for 1080p, in the 2026-10-24–2026-10-29 offer frame
- You want memory headroom — 12 GB is above what this job needsthe same card with 8 GB grades A for 1080p; this one has 12 GB and hits no memory cap
Consider other options if
- Current price sits CAD 72 above the strong-value threshold (~CAD 1088)cheapest tracked CAD 1160 against a CAD 1088 calculated threshold for 1080p
- Value for money matters more to you than this exact modelRX 9070 XT holds Relative Value 93 against its 75 for 1080p, at CAD 1100
- Not the pick if Light Use & Efficiency is your main useit grades only C there
Works well if
- 1440p is your main priority — A here means confident 90–130 fps at high settings, 12 GB+ VRAMgraded A for 1440p on the same rubric as the tier list
- Strong-value threshold: ~CAD 1056CAD 1056 is where Relative Value reaches 80 for 1440p, in the 2026-10-24–2026-10-29 offer frame
- You want memory headroom — 12 GB is above what this job needsthe same card with 10 GB grades B for 1440p; this one has 12 GB and hits no memory cap
Consider other options if
- Current price sits CAD 104 above the strong-value threshold (~CAD 1056)cheapest tracked CAD 1160 against a CAD 1056 calculated threshold for 1440p
- Value for money matters more to you than this exact modelRX 9070 XT holds Relative Value 100 against its 75 for 1440p, at CAD 1100
- Not the pick if Light Use & Efficiency is your main useit grades only C there
Works well if
- 4K is your main priority — B here means around 60 fps at 4K high; upscaling keeps it theregraded B for 4K on the same rubric as the tier list
- You want memory headroom — 12 GB is above what this job needsthe same card with 10 GB grades C for 4K; this one has 12 GB and hits no memory cap
- DLSS 4.5 + 5 with multi-frame generation matters to yousecond-generation transformer upscaler + dynamic multi-frame generation; DLSS 5 in supporting games — derived from the blackwell architecture, not from a scraped feature flag
Consider other options if
- You want strong value for 4K specificallyat today's market no realistic price for this model reaches strong value for 4K — the calculation only gets there near CAD 482, against a cheapest tracked CAD 1160
- Value for money matters more to you than this exact modelRX 9070 XT holds Relative Value 77 against its 54 for 4K, at CAD 1100
- Not the pick if Light Use & Efficiency is your main useit grades only C there
Works well if
- Ray Tracing @ 1080p is your main priority — A here means solid — a good base for upscalinggraded A for Ray Tracing @ 1080p on the same rubric as the tier list, from 74 fps measured natively (upscaling typically adds 40–60% on top)
- Strong-value threshold: ~CAD 1138CAD 1138 is where Relative Value reaches 80 for Ray Tracing @ 1080p, in the 2026-10-24–2026-10-29 offer frame
- You want memory headroom — 12 GB is above what this job needsthe same card with 6 GB grades C for Ray Tracing @ 1080p; this one has 12 GB and hits no memory cap
Consider other options if
- Current price sits CAD 22 above the strong-value threshold (~CAD 1138)cheapest tracked CAD 1160 against a CAD 1138 calculated threshold for Ray Tracing @ 1080p
- Value for money matters more to you than this exact modelRX 9070 XT holds Relative Value 100 against its 79 for Ray Tracing @ 1080p, at CAD 1100
- Not the pick if Light Use & Efficiency is your main useit grades only C there
Works well if
- Ray Tracing @ 1440p is your main priority — B here means solid — a good base for upscalinggraded B for Ray Tracing @ 1440p on the same rubric as the tier list, from 52 fps measured natively (upscaling typically adds 40–60% on top)
- Strong-value threshold: ~CAD 1065CAD 1065 is where Relative Value reaches 80 for Ray Tracing @ 1440p, in the 2026-10-24–2026-10-29 offer frame
- You want memory headroom — 12 GB is above what this job needsthe same card with 6 GB grades C for Ray Tracing @ 1440p; this one has 12 GB and hits no memory cap
Consider other options if
- Current price sits CAD 95 above the strong-value threshold (~CAD 1065)cheapest tracked CAD 1160 against a CAD 1065 calculated threshold for Ray Tracing @ 1440p
- Value for money matters more to you than this exact modelRX 9070 XT holds Relative Value 100 against its 75 for Ray Tracing @ 1440p, at CAD 1100
- Not the pick if Light Use & Efficiency is your main useit grades only C there
For the selected scenario this is not a strong fit — the grade above is the reason, and the models below suit it better.
Works well if
- Ray Tracing @ 4K is not actually your main job — 1080p Gaming isit grades D for Ray Tracing @ 4K, but S for 1080p Gaming
Consider other options if
- Not the pick if Ray Tracing @ 4K is your main useit grades D there; RTX 4070 Ti Super grades C at CAD 1283
- You want strong value for Ray Tracing @ 4K specificallyat today's market no realistic price for this model reaches strong value for Ray Tracing @ 4K — the calculation only gets there near CAD 370, against a cheapest tracked CAD 1160
- Value for money matters more to you than this exact modelRX 9070 XT holds Relative Value 71 against its 51 for Ray Tracing @ 4K, at CAD 1100
Works well if
- AI is your main prioritygraded B for AI on the same rubric as the tier list
- You want memory headroom — 12 GB is above what this job needsthe same card with 10 GB grades C for AI; this one has 12 GB and hits no memory cap
- DLSS 4.5 + 5 with multi-frame generation matters to yousecond-generation transformer upscaler + dynamic multi-frame generation; DLSS 5 in supporting games — derived from the blackwell architecture, not from a scraped feature flag
Consider other options if
- You want strong value for AI specificallycompeting products deliver so much more for AI per dollar that no price this model realistically trades at reaches the strong-value mark for this job
- Value for money matters more to you than this exact modelRTX 4070 Super holds Relative Value 28 against its 24 for AI, at CAD 1026
- Not the pick if Light Use & Efficiency is your main useit grades only C there
Works well if
- 3D Rendering is your main prioritygraded A for 3D Rendering on the same rubric as the tier list
- You want memory headroom — 12 GB is above what this job needsthe same card with 6 GB grades C for 3D Rendering; this one has 12 GB and hits no memory cap
- DLSS 4.5 + 5 with multi-frame generation matters to yousecond-generation transformer upscaler + dynamic multi-frame generation; DLSS 5 in supporting games — derived from the blackwell architecture, not from a scraped feature flag
Consider other options if
- You want strong value for 3D Rendering specificallyat today's market no realistic price for this model reaches strong value for 3D Rendering — the calculation only gets there near CAD 313, against a cheapest tracked CAD 1160
- Value for money matters more to you than this exact modelRTX 4070 Super holds Relative Value 42 against its 36 for 3D Rendering, at CAD 1026
- Not the pick if Light Use & Efficiency is your main useit grades only C there
For the selected scenario this is not a strong fit — the grade above is the reason, and the models below suit it better.
Works well if
- Light Use is not actually your main job — 1080p Gaming isit grades C for Light Use, but S for 1080p Gaming
Consider other options if
- Not the pick if Light Use is your main useit grades C there; RTX 3050 6GB grades S at CAD 600
- You want strong value for Light Use specificallyat today's market no realistic price for this model reaches strong value for Light Use — the calculation only gets there near CAD 325, against a cheapest tracked CAD 1160
- Value for money matters more to you than this exact modelRTX 3050 6GB holds Relative Value 100 against its 31 for Light Use, at CAD 600
Every line states the fact it was derived from, for the scenario selected above. Thresholds are calculated points on our value curve — information about where the maths turns, not instructions about what to pay.
Similar options to the RTX 5070
Chosen for Balanced
Chosen for 1080p
Chosen for 1440p
Chosen for 4K
Chosen for Ray Tracing @ 1080p
Chosen for Ray Tracing @ 1440p
Chosen for Ray Tracing @ 4K
Chosen for AI
This scenario carries a requirement candidates are checked against first: CUDA — Many local-LLM and diffusion toolchains are CUDA-only. ROCm and Vulkan builds exist and work, but they are not drop-in — check your toolchain before treating a non-NVIDIA card as an equivalent swap.
Chosen for 3D Rendering
This scenario carries a requirement candidates are checked against first: OptiX — Blender Cycles reaches its fastest path on NVIDIA OptiX. HIP (AMD) and oneAPI (Intel) render the same scenes, so this is a workflow question, not a capability wall — but render times and add-on support differ.
Chosen for Light Use
Alternatives stay near this product’s price range. Step-up options may exceed the standard budget envelope when the capability gain is meaningful.
More head-to-head comparisons in this category
Upgrade planner
Judge the change in the active scenario, then make the cash gap explicit.
Using page scenarioWhat are you upgrading from? These are the axes we compare on, and where this product stands in the current market.
We rank upgrades by out-of-pocket cost — the new price minus what yours is worth — not by sticker price.
Only candidates that clear the configured meaningful-upgrade gate will be shown; roles are omitted rather than filled.
Capability differences are expressed as tiers and index points, not as benchmark percentages we did not measure.
Specifications and compatibility
What this product is, and what to check before it goes into your build.
Core / Performance
- Architecture
- Blackwell 2.0
- GPU chip
- GB205
- GPU variant
- GB205-300-A1
- Process node
- 5 nm
- Transistors
- 31,100 million
- Shading units
- 6144
Memory
Power / Interface
- Board power (TBP)
- 250 W
- Power connector
- Varies by version
- Recommended PSU
- Varies by version
- Bus interface
- PCIe 5.0 x16
Physical / Outputs
- Length
- Varies by version249–329 mm across tracked variants
- Height
- Varies by version110–140 mm across tracked variants
- Width
- Varies by version
- Slot thickness
- Varies by version2–3 across tracked variants
- Fans
- Varies by version2–3 across tracked variants
- Cooling
- Varies by version
- Outputs
- Varies by version
Power / Interface
- Board power (TBP)
- 250 W
- Power connector
- 1x 16-pin
- Recommended PSU
- 600 W
- Bus interface
- PCIe 5.0 x16
Physical / Outputs
- Length
- 249 mm
- Height
- 126 mm
- Width
- Unknown
- Slot thickness
- 2 slots
- Fans
- 2
- Cooling
- Air
- Outputs
- 3× DisplayPort · 1× HDMI
Exact board / Identity
- Board part number
- DUAL-RTX5070-12G
- Vendor warranty
- 3 years
Power / Interface
- Board power (TBP)
- 250 W
- Power connector
- 1x 16-pin
- Recommended PSU
- 600 W
- Bus interface
- PCIe 5.0 x16
Physical / Outputs
- Length
- 249 mm
- Height
- 126 mm
- Width
- Unknown
- Slot thickness
- 2 slots
- Fans
- 2
- Cooling
- Air
- Outputs
- 3× DisplayPort · 1× HDMI
Exact board / Identity
- Board part number
- DUAL-RTX5070-O12G
- Vendor warranty
- 3 years
Power / Interface
- Board power (TBP)
- 250 W
- Power connector
- 1x 16-pin
- Recommended PSU
- 600 W
- Bus interface
- PCIe 5.0 x16
Physical / Outputs
- Length
- 329 mm
- Height
- 140 mm
- Width
- Unknown
- Slot thickness
- 3 slots
- Fans
- 3
- Cooling
- Air
- Outputs
- 3× DisplayPort · 2× HDMI
Exact board / Identity
- Board part number
- TUF-RTX5070-O12G-GAMING
- Vendor warranty
- 3 years
Power / Interface
- Board power (TBP)
- 250 W
- Power connector
- 1x 16-pin
- Recommended PSU
- 600 W
- Bus interface
- PCIe 5.0 x16
Physical / Outputs
- Length
- 282 mm
- Height
- 110 mm
- Width
- Unknown
- Slot thickness
- 2 slots
- Fans
- 3
- Cooling
- Air
- Outputs
- 3× DisplayPort · 1× HDMI
Exact board / Identity
- Board part number
- GV-N5070WF3-12GD
- Vendor warranty
- 3 years
Power / Interface
- Board power (TBP)
- 250 W
- Power connector
- 1x 16-pin
- Recommended PSU
- 600 W
- Bus interface
- PCIe 5.0 x16
Physical / Outputs
- Length
- 303 mm
- Height
- 121 mm
- Width
- Unknown
- Slot thickness
- 2 slots
- Fans
- 3
- Cooling
- Air
- Outputs
- 3× DisplayPort · 1× HDMI
Exact board / Identity
- Board part number
- G5070-12S3C
- Vendor warranty
- 3 years
Power / Interface
- Board power (TBP)
- 250 W
- Power connector
- 1x 16-pin
- Recommended PSU
- 600 W
- Bus interface
- PCIe 5.0 x16
Physical / Outputs
- Length
- Unknown
- Height
- Unknown
- Width
- Unknown
- Slot thickness
- Unknown
- Fans
- Unknown
- Cooling
- Air
- Outputs
- Unknown
Exact board / Identity
- Board part number
- ROG-STRIX-RTX5070-O12G-GAMING
- Vendor warranty
- 3 years
Power / Interface
- Board power (TBP)
- 250 W
- Power connector
- 1x 16-pin
- Recommended PSU
- 600 W
- Bus interface
- PCIe 5.0 x16
Physical / Outputs
- Length
- Unknown
- Height
- Unknown
- Width
- Unknown
- Slot thickness
- Unknown
- Fans
- Unknown
- Cooling
- Air
- Outputs
- Unknown
Exact board / Identity
- Board part number
- GV-N5070AORUS IF-12GD
- Vendor warranty
- 3 years
Select an exact version for physical dimensions and connector details.
Show all specifications
Core / Performance
- Texture units
- 192
- ROPs
- 80
- Ray tracing cores
- 48
- Tensor cores
- 192
- Base clock
- 2325 MHz
- Boost clock
- 2542 MHz
Features
- Upscaling
- DLSS 4.5 + 5
- Frame generation
- multi-frame generation
- Ray tracing
- Supported
- RGB lighting
- No
Warranty & release
- Release year
- 2025
Hover any value to see where it came from: a manufacturer specification, or a figure The Comparator calculated.
Sources: Comparator offer frame 2026-10-24–2026-10-29
What to check in your build
Varies by version
The exact requirement depends on the version you select.
Varies by version
Select a board to confirm its connector and cable-clearance needs.
Varies by version
The exact requirement depends on the version you select.
Varies by version
The exact requirement depends on the version you select.
Varies by version
Slot occupancy depends on the board cooler and thickness.
Select an exact version above for physical dimensions and connector details.
600 W PSU recommended
Whole-system figure from the board vendor — it already allows for the processor and transient spikes.
1x 16-pin required
Adapters work but add connector bulk and need extra cable-bend clearance.
Needs at least 249 mm of GPU clearance
Front radiators and fans eat into the figure a case advertises.
Leave room beyond the card for the cable bend
No verified minimum is published — measure it.
Occupies 2 slots
The cooler covers the slots below it — check nothing adjacent needs that space.
600 W PSU recommended
Whole-system figure from the board vendor — it already allows for the processor and transient spikes.
1x 16-pin required
Adapters work but add connector bulk and need extra cable-bend clearance.
Needs at least 249 mm of GPU clearance
Front radiators and fans eat into the figure a case advertises.
Leave room beyond the card for the cable bend
No verified minimum is published — measure it.
Occupies 2 slots
The cooler covers the slots below it — check nothing adjacent needs that space.
600 W PSU recommended
Whole-system figure from the board vendor — it already allows for the processor and transient spikes.
1x 16-pin required
Adapters work but add connector bulk and need extra cable-bend clearance.
Needs at least 329 mm of GPU clearance
Front radiators and fans eat into the figure a case advertises.
Leave room beyond the card for the cable bend
No verified minimum is published — measure it.
Occupies 3 slots
The cooler covers the slots below it — check nothing adjacent needs that space.
600 W PSU recommended
Whole-system figure from the board vendor — it already allows for the processor and transient spikes.
1x 16-pin required
Adapters work but add connector bulk and need extra cable-bend clearance.
Needs at least 282 mm of GPU clearance
Front radiators and fans eat into the figure a case advertises.
Leave room beyond the card for the cable bend
No verified minimum is published — measure it.
Occupies 2 slots
The cooler covers the slots below it — check nothing adjacent needs that space.
600 W PSU recommended
Whole-system figure from the board vendor — it already allows for the processor and transient spikes.
1x 16-pin required
Adapters work but add connector bulk and need extra cable-bend clearance.
Needs at least 303 mm of GPU clearance
Front radiators and fans eat into the figure a case advertises.
Leave room beyond the card for the cable bend
No verified minimum is published — measure it.
Occupies 2 slots
The cooler covers the slots below it — check nothing adjacent needs that space.
600 W PSU recommended
Whole-system figure from the board vendor — it already allows for the processor and transient spikes.
1x 16-pin required
Adapters work but add connector bulk and need extra cable-bend clearance.
Unknown
Leave room beyond the card for the cable bend
No verified minimum is published — measure it.
Unknown
600 W PSU recommended
Whole-system figure from the board vendor — it already allows for the processor and transient spikes.
1x 16-pin required
Adapters work but add connector bulk and need extra cable-bend clearance.
Unknown
Leave room beyond the card for the cable bend
No verified minimum is published — measure it.
Unknown
Compare all 7 board variants
| Variant | Length | Slot thickness | Power connector | Recommended PSU |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ASUS DUAL RTX 5070 | 249 mm | 2 | 1x 16-pin | 600 W |
| ASUS DUAL RTX 5070 OC Edition | 249 mm | 2 | 1x 16-pin | 600 W |
| ASUS TUF Gaming RTX 5070 OC Edition | 329 mm | 3 | 1x 16-pin | 600 W |
| GIGABYTE RTX 5070 WINDFORCE SFF | 282 mm | 2 | 1x 16-pin | 600 W |
| MSI RTX 5070 SHADOW 3X OC | 303 mm | 2 | 1x 16-pin | 600 W |
| ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 5070 OC Edition 12GB | Unknown | Unknown | 1x 16-pin | 600 W |
| Gigabyte AORUS GeForce RTX 5070 INFINITY 12G | Unknown | Unknown | 1x 16-pin | 600 W |
Found an error? Report this specification Email the field, corrected value and an optional source.
Compatibility guidance is practical help, not a score. Missing data is shown as unknown, never invented.
Summary
RTX 5070 offers a balanced view across an all-round mix of priorities. It ranks #12 by capability in the current modelled field. Its clearest measured strength is raster index 1219. RX 9070 currently clears the same practical bar with stronger Relative Value.
RTX 5070 offers S-grade capability for 1080p. It ranks #12 by capability in the current modelled field. Its clearest measured strength is raster index 1219. RX 9070 currently clears the same practical bar with stronger Relative Value.
RTX 5070 offers A-grade capability for 1440p. It ranks #12 by capability in the current modelled field. Its clearest measured strength is raster index 1219. RX 9070 currently clears the same practical bar with stronger Relative Value.
RTX 5070 offers B-grade capability for 4K. It ranks #12 by capability in the current modelled field. Its clearest measured strength is raster index 1219. RX 9070 currently clears the same practical bar with stronger Relative Value.
RTX 5070 offers A-grade capability for Ray Tracing @ 1080p. It ranks #10 by capability in the current modelled field. Its clearest measured strength is ray-tracing index 1280. RTX 4070 Super currently clears the same practical bar with stronger Relative Value.
RTX 5070 offers B-grade capability for Ray Tracing @ 1440p. It ranks #10 by capability in the current modelled field. Its clearest measured strength is ray-tracing index 1280. RX 9070 currently clears the same practical bar with stronger Relative Value.
RTX 5070 offers D-grade capability for Ray Tracing @ 4K. It ranks #13 by capability in the current modelled field. Its clearest measured strength is ray-tracing index 1280. The D grade is the decisive limitation for this workload.
RTX 5070 offers B-grade capability for AI. It ranks #11 by capability in the current modelled field. Its clearest measured strength is ai compute index 1059. RTX 4070 Super currently clears the same practical bar with stronger Relative Value.
RTX 5070 offers A-grade capability for 3D Rendering. It ranks #10 by capability in the current modelled field. Its clearest measured strength is raster index 1219. RTX 4070 currently clears the same practical bar with stronger Relative Value.
RTX 5070 offers C-grade capability for Light Use. It ranks #26 by capability in the current modelled field. Its clearest measured strength is raster index 1219. The C grade is the decisive limitation for this workload.
FAQ
Do all RTX 5070 boards have the same physical design?
No. Dimensions, slot thickness, cooling, power connectors and display outputs belong to the exact board. Use the Exact version selector before checking case or PSU fit.
How much case clearance should I allow for the RTX 5070?
Tracked boards range from 249 to 329 mm in length. Select the exact board, then also allow for front radiators or fans, card height, slot thickness and power-cable bend; length alone does not guarantee fit.
Why does Relative Value change when I choose another scenario?
Each scenario changes the weights applied to capability, price and the other published factors. The hardware facts stay fixed, but the value question changes, so its score and rank can change too.
Why can Amazon appear without a tracked price?
Amazon listing snapshots can participate in Value while fresh. We show Check on Amazon instead of its price; confirm the current price and availability at the store. When no current listing snapshot exists, Amazon is a search link only.
Useful links & sources
offer frame 2026-10-24–2026-10-29 · formula gpu-value-v1.4 · facts facts-2026-10-29 · Relative Value is an estimate from our current dataset, the selected weights and dated market prices — not an official product rating and not a price forecast. Target prices are calculation thresholds, not predictions. Methodology We are not a shop. Affiliate links may earn us a commission; they never change the calculations or the ranking.