RTX 5060
The current RTX 5060 price from retailers, its key specifications, and how it performs for each job.
NVIDIA · GPU · RTX 50
Retailer photo of GIGABYTE RTX 5060 WINDFORCE MAX OC. View this offer in Where to buy
Works well for: 1080p Gaming
Trade-offs: Current offer is above the strong-value threshold (~CAD 585); check the price on Amazon
- VRAM
- 8 GB
- Memory bandwidth
- 448 GB/s
- Board power
- 145 W
- Architecture
- Blackwell 2.0
- Interface
- PCIe 5.0 x8
Move a slider and the page re-scores this product against the same market frame.
What does it cost today, and is that a good price?
Market confidence: HighConsider: RX 9070 GRE offers stronger value around CAD 750.Compare
Prices & availability
RTX 5060: current price and offers
Compare the offers we track for this model, across variants and retailers.
10 tracked offers · 2 retailers
| Variant | Store | Condition | Price (snapshot) | Value · Balanced | Checked | Offer link |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ASUS DUAL RTX 5060 | Amazon | New | Check on Amazon | 74 | 2026-10-29 | View offer → |
| GIGABYTE RTX 5060 WINDFORCE MAX OC | Newegg | New | CAD 660 | 74 | 2026-10-29 | View offer → |
| GIGABYTE RTX 5060 GAMING OC | Newegg | New | CAD 690 | 71 | 2026-10-29 | View offer → |
| GIGABYTE RTX 5060 WINDFORCE OC | Amazon | New | Check on Amazon | 70 | 2026-10-29 | View offer → |
| ASUS DUAL RTX 5060 White OC Edition | Newegg | New | CAD 730 | 69 | 2026-10-29 | View offer → |
| RTX 5060Multiple variants available | Amazon Affiliate | Varies | Find on Amazon | Not tracked | No price snapshot | Find on Amazon → |
Prices are dated snapshots, not live quotes — confirm the final price at the store. New, refurbished and used offers are listed separately; used offers carry warranty and seller risk.
Show the other 5 tracked offers
| Variant | Store | Condition | Price (snapshot) | Value · Balanced | Checked | Offer link |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MSI RTX 5060 GAMING OC | Amazon | New | Check on Amazon | 65 | 2026-10-29 | View offer → |
| GIGABYTE RTX 5060 AERO OC | Amazon | New | Check on Amazon | 55 | 2026-10-29 | View offer → |
| ASUS DUAL RTX 5060 | Newegg | New | CAD 1,300 | 46 | 2026-10-29 | View offer → |
| GIGABYTE RTX 5060 AERO OC | Newegg | New | CAD 1,400 | 43 | 2026-10-29 | View offer → |
| GIGABYTE RTX 5060 WINDFORCE | Newegg | New | CAD 1,400 | 43 | 2026-10-29 | View offer → |
Performance and where it ranks
Two different questions, side by side. Performance compares what the hardware can do; Value compares what that capability costs at today’s price. A product can rank high on one and low on the other — that gap is the point.
Performance Balanced
How much it can do. Price plays no part in this ranking.
#28 of 40 graded graphics cards
- #25 AMDRX 7700 XT 35
- #26 NVIDIARTX 3070 Ti 34
- #27 NVIDIARTX 4060 Ti 8GB 33
- #28 NVIDIARTX 5060 31
- #29 NVIDIARTX 3060 Ti 28
- #30 AMDRX 6700 XT 28
- #31 NVIDIARTX 4060 26
Value Balanced
How much of that you get for today’s price.
#12 of 41 currently priced graphics cards
- #9 NVIDIARTX 4080 Super 77
- #10 NVIDIARTX 5070 Ti 76
- #11 NVIDIARTX 5060 Ti 8GB 76
- #12 NVIDIARTX 5060 74
- #13 NVIDIARTX 4070 71
- #14 AMDRX 7800 XT 71
- #15 NVIDIARTX 5080 70
Performance 1080p
How much it can do. Price plays no part in this ranking.
#28 of 40 graded graphics cards
- #25 AMDRX 7700 XT 35
- #26 NVIDIARTX 3070 Ti 34
- #27 NVIDIARTX 4060 Ti 8GB 33
- #28 NVIDIARTX 5060 31
- #29 NVIDIARTX 3060 Ti 28
- #30 AMDRX 6700 XT 28
- #31 NVIDIARTX 4060 26
Value 1080p
How much of that you get for today’s price.
#7 of 41 currently priced graphics cards
- #4 AMDRX 9070 XT 93
- #5 AMDRX 9070 89
- #6 NVIDIARTX 5060 Ti 8GB 81
- #7 NVIDIARTX 5060 80
- #8 NVIDIARTX 4070 Super 79
- #9 NVIDIARTX 5070 75
- #10 NVIDIARTX 4070 Ti Super 74
Performance 1440p
How much it can do. Price plays no part in this ranking.
#28 of 40 graded graphics cards
- #25 AMDRX 7700 XT 35
- #26 NVIDIARTX 3070 Ti 34
- #27 NVIDIARTX 4060 Ti 8GB 33
- #28 NVIDIARTX 5060 31
- #29 NVIDIARTX 3060 Ti 28
- #30 AMDRX 6700 XT 28
- #31 NVIDIARTX 4060 26
Value 1440p
How much of that you get for today’s price.
#20 of 41 currently priced graphics cards
- #17 AMDRX 7800 XT 60
- #18 NVIDIARTX 4070 Ti 58
- #19 NVIDIARTX 4080 56
- #20 NVIDIARTX 5060 56
- #21 NVIDIARTX 5060 Ti 16GB 55
- #22 AMDRX 7900 XTX 55
- #23 AMDRX 7900 GRE 55
Performance 4K
How much it can do. Price plays no part in this ranking.
#28 of 40 graded graphics cards
- #25 AMDRX 7700 XT 35
- #26 NVIDIARTX 3070 Ti 34
- #27 NVIDIARTX 4060 Ti 8GB 33
- #28 NVIDIARTX 5060 31
- #29 NVIDIARTX 3060 Ti 28
- #30 AMDRX 6700 XT 28
- #31 NVIDIARTX 4060 26
Value 4K
How much of that you get for today’s price.
#24 of 41 currently priced graphics cards
- #21 AMDRX 9060 XT 8GB 34
- #22 NVIDIARTX 5060 Ti 8GB 33
- #23 AMDRX 7700 XT 30
- #24 NVIDIARTX 5060 29
- #25 NVIDIARTX PRO 4000 Blackwell 23
- #26 IntelIntel Arc Pro B70 22
- #27 NVIDIARTX 5050 21
Performance Ray Tracing @ 1080p
How much it can do. Price plays no part in this ranking.
#24 of 35 graded graphics cards
- #21 AMDRX 9060 XT 16GB 36
- #22 NVIDIARTX 3070 Ti 33
- #23 AMDRX 7700 XT 33
- #24 NVIDIARTX 5060 33
- #25 NVIDIARTX 4060 27
- #26 NVIDIARTX 3060 Ti 26
- #27 AMDRX 9060 XT 8GB 26
Value Ray Tracing @ 1080p
How much of that you get for today’s price.
#15 of 41 currently priced graphics cards
- #12 NVIDIARTX 5060 Ti 8GB 66
- #13 NVIDIARTX 5090 62
- #14 NVIDIARTX 4070 Ti 62
- #15 NVIDIARTX 5060 61
- #16 NVIDIARTX 4070 61
- #17 NVIDIARTX 4080 59
- #18 NVIDIARTX 5060 Ti 16GB 58
Performance Ray Tracing @ 1440p
How much it can do. Price plays no part in this ranking.
#24 of 35 graded graphics cards
- #21 NVIDIARTX 3070 Ti 27
- #22 NVIDIARTX 5060 Ti 8GB 26
- #23 AMDRX 7700 XT 25
- #24 NVIDIARTX 5060 24
- #25 NVIDIARTX 3060 Ti 22
- #26 NVIDIARTX 4060 21
- #27 NVIDIARTX 3060 12GB 21
Value Ray Tracing @ 1440p
How much of that you get for today’s price.
#18 of 41 currently priced graphics cards
- #15 NVIDIARTX 4080 58
- #16 NVIDIARTX 4070 57
- #17 NVIDIARTX 5060 Ti 16GB 55
- #18 NVIDIARTX 5060 53
- #19 AMDRX 7900 XT 49
- #20 AMDRX 7800 XT 49
- #21 AMDRX 7900 GRE 48
Performance Ray Tracing @ 4K
How much it can do. Price plays no part in this ranking.
#28 of 35 graded graphics cards
- #25 NVIDIARTX 3060 Ti 12
- #26 AMDRX 9060 XT 8GB 11
- #27 NVIDIARTX 5060 Ti 8GB 11
- #28 NVIDIARTX 5060 11
- #29 NVIDIARTX 4060 11
- #30 NVIDIARTX 5050 10
- #31 NVIDIARTX 3050 6GB 7
Value Ray Tracing @ 4K
How much of that you get for today’s price.
#22 of 41 currently priced graphics cards
- #19 AMDRX 7900 GRE 36
- #20 AMDRX 7800 XT 34
- #21 NVIDIARTX 5060 Ti 8GB 31
- #22 NVIDIARTX 5060 27
- #23 AMDRX 7700 XT 26
- #24 AMDRX 9060 XT 8GB 24
- #25 NVIDIARTX 5050 20
Performance AI
How much it can do. Price plays no part in this ranking.
#29 of 39 graded graphics cards
- #26 AMDRX 7900 GRE 11
- #27 NVIDIARTX 3050 6GB 11
- #28 NVIDIARTX 3050 8GB 11
- #29 NVIDIARTX 5060 9
- #30 AMDRX 7800 XT 9
- #31 AMDRX 7700 XT 8
- #32 NVIDIARTX 4060 7
Value AI
How much of that you get for today’s price.
#30 of 41 currently priced graphics cards
- #27 NVIDIARTX 5060 Ti 8GB 8
- #28 IntelIntel Arc Pro B70 7
- #29 NVIDIARTX 3060 Ti 7
- #30 NVIDIARTX 5060 6
- #31 AMDRX 7700 XT 6
- #32 NVIDIARTX 3050 8GB 6
- #33 NVIDIARTX 3050 6GB 6
Performance 3D Rendering
How much it can do. Price plays no part in this ranking.
#18 of 37 graded graphics cards
- #15 NVIDIARTX 5060 Ti 16GB 28
- #16 AMDRX 7900 XTX 27
- #17 AMDRX 7900 XT 24
- #18 NVIDIARTX 5060 24
- #19 NVIDIARTX 3070 Ti 23
- #20 NVIDIARTX 4060 23
- #21 AMDRX 9070 XT 22
Value 3D Rendering
How much of that you get for today’s price.
#26 of 41 currently priced graphics cards
- #23 NVIDIARTX 5060 Ti 8GB 13
- #24 AMDRX 7900 GRE 12
- #25 AMDRX 7800 XT 11
- #26 NVIDIARTX 5060 10
- #27 NVIDIARTX 3060 Ti 10
- #28 NVIDIARTX 3060 12GB 10
- #29 AMDRX 7700 XT 8
Performance Light Use
How much it can do. Price plays no part in this ranking.
#9 of 39 graded graphics cards
- #6 NVIDIARTX 5050 85
- #7 NVIDIARTX 3050 8GB 85
- #8 NVIDIARTX PRO 4000 Blackwell 83
- #9 NVIDIARTX 5060 82
- #10 AMDRX 9060 XT 8GB 80
- #11 AMDRX 9060 XT 16GB 78
- #12 NVIDIARTX 4060 Ti 8GB 78
Value Light Use
How much of that you get for today’s price.
#4 of 41 currently priced graphics cards
- #1 NVIDIARTX 3050 6GB 100
- #2 NVIDIAGTX 1650 93
- #3 NVIDIARTX 5050 73
- #4 NVIDIARTX 5060 66
- #5 AMDRX 9060 XT 8GB 63
- #6 AMDRX 9060 XT 16GB 61
- #7 AMDRX 6500 XT 4GB 58
These ladders follow the preset scenario shown above. Your own weights re-score this product, not the whole field.
What it is good for
| Scenario | this productCapability grade · Value at current price | Higher capability | Higher Value with current priorities |
|---|---|---|---|
| Balanced (all-round)Weighted all-round view | GradeNo grade Value74 | Higher capability RX 9070 GRE 95 +41% capability | Higher Value with current priorities RX 9060 XT 8GB 85 +30% capability |
| 1080p GamingRaster performance · 1080p | GradeA Value80 | Higher capability RX 9070 GRE S 100 +41% capability | Higher Value with current priorities RX 9060 XT 8GB A 97 +30% capability |
| 1440p GamingRaster performance · 1440p | GradeB Value56 | Higher capability RX 9070 GRE A 83 +41% capability | Higher Value with current priorities RX 9060 XT 8GB B 66 +30% capability |
| 4K / VRRaster performance · 4K / VR | GradeD Value29 | Higher capability RX 9070 GRE C 51 +41% capability | Higher Value with current priorities RX 9060 XT 8GB C 34 +30% capability |
| Ray Tracing @ 1080pRay tracing capability · 1080p | GradeC Value61 | Higher capability RX 9070 GRE B 80 +43% capability | — |
| Ray Tracing @ 1440pRay tracing capability · 1440p | GradeD Value53 | Higher capability RX 9070 GRE C 75 +52% capability | — |
| Ray Tracing @ 4KRay tracing capability · 4K | GradeF Value27 | Higher capability RX 9070 GRE F 44 +128% capability | — |
| AI / Local LLMAI compute · memory and ecosystem fit | GradeC Value6 | Higher capability RX 9070 GRE B 16 ⚠ not a drop-in swap +78% capability | Higher Value with current priorities RX 9060 XT 8GB C 9 ⚠ not a drop-in swap +33% capability |
| 3D Rendering3D rendering · creator workloads | GradeC Value10 | Higher capability RTX 5060 Ti 8GB B 13 +17% capability | — |
| Light Use & EfficiencyEfficiency · lighter workloads | GradeB Value66 | Higher capability Higher capability · Higher Value with current priorities RTX 3050 6GB S 100 +22% capability | |
Balanced has no letter: it is a weighting preset, not a capability rubric. A grade answers “how well does this handle that job?” — price is never part of it. Relative Value puts the current market price back in.
Compare these grades with the full tier list
Browse shortlists for different uses
Trade-offs
Works well if
- 1080p Gaming is your main prioritygraded A for 1080p Gaming on the same rubric as the tier list
- Strong-value threshold: ~CAD 585CAD 585 is where Relative Value reaches 80 with Balanced priorities, in the 2026-10-24–2026-10-29 offer frame
- You want memory headroom — memory is not what limits it hereno memory cap applies to this grade — the raster index sets it, not the frame buffer
Consider other options if
- Current offer is above the strong-value threshold (~CAD 585); check the price on AmazonCAD 585 is where Relative Value reaches 80 with Balanced priorities, in the 2026-10-24–2026-10-29 offer frame
- Not the pick if 4K / VR is your main useit grades only D there
Works well if
- 1080p is your main priority — A here means confident 90–120 fps at high settingsgraded A for 1080p on the same rubric as the tier list
- Today's price already clears the strong-value markCAD 661 is where Relative Value reaches 80 for 1080p, in the 2026-10-24–2026-10-29 offer frame
- You want memory headroom — memory is not what limits it hereno memory cap applies to this grade for 1080p — the raster index sets it, not the frame buffer
Consider other options if
- Not the pick if 4K / VR is your main useit grades only D there
Works well if
- 1440p is your main priority — B here means solid 60 fps at high settingsgraded B for 1440p on the same rubric as the tier list
- You want memory headroom — 8 GB is above what this job needsthe same card with 6 GB grades C for 1440p; this one has 8 GB and hits no memory cap
- DLSS 4.5 + 5 with multi-frame generation matters to yousecond-generation transformer upscaler + dynamic multi-frame generation; DLSS 5 in supporting games — derived from the blackwell architecture, not from a scraped feature flag
Consider other options if
- You want strong value for 1440p specificallyCAD 407 is where Relative Value reaches 80 for 1440p, in the 2026-10-24–2026-10-29 offer frame
- Not the pick if 4K / VR is your main useit grades only D there
For the selected scenario this is not a strong fit — the grade above is the reason, and the models below suit it better.
Works well if
- 4K is not actually your main job — 1080p Gaming isit grades D for 4K, but A for 1080p Gaming
Consider other options if
- Not the pick if 4K is your main useit grades D there; RX 9070 GRE grades C at CAD 750
- You want strong value for 4K specificallycompeting products deliver so much more for 4K per dollar that no price this model realistically trades at reaches the strong-value mark for this job
For the selected scenario this is not a strong fit — the grade above is the reason, and the models below suit it better.
Works well if
- Ray Tracing @ 1080p is not actually your main job — 1080p Gaming isit grades C for Ray Tracing @ 1080p, but A for 1080p Gaming
- Strong-value threshold: ~CAD 453CAD 453 is where Relative Value reaches 80 for Ray Tracing @ 1080p, in the 2026-10-24–2026-10-29 offer frame
Consider other options if
- Not the pick if Ray Tracing @ 1080p is your main useit grades C there; RX 9070 GRE grades B at CAD 750
- Current offer is above the strong-value threshold (~CAD 453); check the price on AmazonCAD 453 is where Relative Value reaches 80 for Ray Tracing @ 1080p, in the 2026-10-24–2026-10-29 offer frame
For the selected scenario this is not a strong fit — the grade above is the reason, and the models below suit it better.
Works well if
- Ray Tracing @ 1440p is not actually your main job — 1080p Gaming isit grades D for Ray Tracing @ 1440p, but A for 1080p Gaming
Consider other options if
- Not the pick if Ray Tracing @ 1440p is your main useit grades D there; RX 9070 GRE grades C at CAD 750
- You want strong value for Ray Tracing @ 1440p specificallyCAD 371 is where Relative Value reaches 80 for Ray Tracing @ 1440p, in the 2026-10-24–2026-10-29 offer frame
For the selected scenario this is not a strong fit — the grade above is the reason, and the models below suit it better.
Works well if
- Ray Tracing @ 4K is not actually your main job — 1080p Gaming isit grades F for Ray Tracing @ 4K, but A for 1080p Gaming
Consider other options if
- Not the pick if Ray Tracing @ 4K is your main useit grades F there; RX 9070 GRE grades F at CAD 750
- You want strong value for Ray Tracing @ 4K specificallycompeting products deliver so much more for Ray Tracing @ 4K per dollar that no price this model realistically trades at reaches the strong-value mark for this job
For the selected scenario this is not a strong fit — the grade above is the reason, and the models below suit it better.
Works well if
- AI is not actually your main job — 1080p Gaming isit grades C for AI, but A for 1080p Gaming
Consider other options if
- Not the pick if AI is your main useit grades C there; RX 9070 GRE grades B at CAD 750
- You want strong value for AI specificallycompeting products deliver so much more for AI per dollar that no price this model realistically trades at reaches the strong-value mark for this job
For the selected scenario this is not a strong fit — the grade above is the reason, and the models below suit it better.
Works well if
- 3D Rendering is not actually your main job — 1080p Gaming isit grades C for 3D Rendering, but A for 1080p Gaming
Consider other options if
- Not the pick if 3D Rendering is your main useit grades C there; RTX 5060 Ti 8GB grades B at CAD 740
- You want strong value for 3D Rendering specificallycompeting products deliver so much more for 3D Rendering per dollar that no price this model realistically trades at reaches the strong-value mark for this job
Works well if
- Light Use is your main prioritygraded B for Light Use on the same rubric as the tier list
- Strong-value threshold: ~CAD 510CAD 510 is where Relative Value reaches 80 for Light Use, in the 2026-10-24–2026-10-29 offer frame
- You want memory headroom — memory is not what limits it hereno memory cap applies to this grade for Light Use — the raster index sets it, not the frame buffer
Consider other options if
- Current offer is above the strong-value threshold (~CAD 510); check the price on AmazonCAD 510 is where Relative Value reaches 80 for Light Use, in the 2026-10-24–2026-10-29 offer frame
- Value for money matters more to you than this exact modelRTX 3050 6GB holds Relative Value 100 against its 66 for Light Use, at CAD 600
- Not the pick if 4K / VR is your main useit grades only D there
Every line states the fact it was derived from, for the scenario selected above. Thresholds are calculated points on our value curve — information about where the maths turns, not instructions about what to pay.
Similar options to the RTX 5060
Chosen for Balanced
Chosen for 1080p
Chosen for 1440p
Chosen for 4K
Chosen for Ray Tracing @ 1080p
Chosen for Ray Tracing @ 1440p
Chosen for Ray Tracing @ 4K
Chosen for AI
This scenario carries a requirement candidates are checked against first: CUDA — Many local-LLM and diffusion toolchains are CUDA-only. ROCm and Vulkan builds exist and work, but they are not drop-in — check your toolchain before treating a non-NVIDIA card as an equivalent swap.
Chosen for 3D Rendering
This scenario carries a requirement candidates are checked against first: OptiX — Blender Cycles reaches its fastest path on NVIDIA OptiX. HIP (AMD) and oneAPI (Intel) render the same scenes, so this is a workflow question, not a capability wall — but render times and add-on support differ.
Chosen for Light Use
Alternatives stay near this product’s price range. Step-up options may exceed the standard budget envelope when the capability gain is meaningful.
More head-to-head comparisons in this category
Upgrade planner
Judge the change in the active scenario, then make the cash gap explicit.
Using page scenarioWhat are you upgrading from? These are the axes we compare on, and where this product stands in the current market.
We rank upgrades by out-of-pocket cost — the new price minus what yours is worth — not by sticker price.
Only candidates that clear the configured meaningful-upgrade gate will be shown; roles are omitted rather than filled.
Capability differences are expressed as tiers and index points, not as benchmark percentages we did not measure.
Specifications and compatibility
What this product is, and what to check before it goes into your build.
Core / Performance
- Architecture
- Blackwell 2.0
- GPU chip
- GB206
- GPU variant
- GB206-250-A1
- Process node
- 5 nm
- Transistors
- 21,900 million
- Shading units
- 3840
Memory
Power / Interface
- Board power (TBP)
- 145 W
- Power connector
- Varies by version
- Recommended PSU
- Varies by version
- Bus interface
- PCIe 5.0 x8
Physical / Outputs
- Length
- Varies by version199–281 mm across tracked variants
- Height
- Varies by version116–135 mm across tracked variants
- Width
- Varies by version
- Slot thickness
- Varies by version2 across tracked variants
- Fans
- Varies by version2 across tracked variants
- Cooling
- Varies by version
- Outputs
- Varies by version
Power / Interface
- Board power (TBP)
- 145 W
- Power connector
- 1x 8-pin
- Recommended PSU
- 300 W
- Bus interface
- PCIe 5.0 x8
Physical / Outputs
- Length
- 228 mm
- Height
- 123 mm
- Width
- Unknown
- Slot thickness
- 2 slots
- Fans
- 2
- Cooling
- Air
- Outputs
- 3× DisplayPort · 1× HDMI
Exact board / Identity
- Board part number
- DUAL-RTX5060-8G
- Vendor warranty
- 3 years
Power / Interface
- Board power (TBP)
- 145 W
- Power connector
- 1x 8-pin
- Recommended PSU
- 300 W
- Bus interface
- PCIe 5.0 x8
Physical / Outputs
- Length
- 228 mm
- Height
- 123 mm
- Width
- Unknown
- Slot thickness
- 2 slots
- Fans
- 2
- Cooling
- Air
- Outputs
- 3× DisplayPort · 1× HDMI
Exact board / Identity
- Board part number
- DUAL-RTX5060-O8G-WHITE
- Vendor warranty
- 3 years
Power / Interface
- Board power (TBP)
- 145 W
- Power connector
- 1x 8-pin
- Recommended PSU
- 300 W
- Bus interface
- PCIe 5.0 x8
Physical / Outputs
- Length
- 281 mm
- Height
- 117 mm
- Width
- Unknown
- Slot thickness
- 2 slots
- Fans
- 2
- Cooling
- Air
- Outputs
- 3× DisplayPort · 1× HDMI
Exact board / Identity
- Board part number
- GV-N5060AERO OC-8GD
- Vendor warranty
- 3 years
Power / Interface
- Board power (TBP)
- 145 W
- Power connector
- 1x 8-pin
- Recommended PSU
- 300 W
- Bus interface
- PCIe 5.0 x8
Physical / Outputs
- Length
- 281 mm
- Height
- 119 mm
- Width
- Unknown
- Slot thickness
- 2 slots
- Fans
- 2
- Cooling
- Air
- Outputs
- 3× DisplayPort · 1× HDMI
Exact board / Identity
- Board part number
- GV-N5060GAMING OC-8GD
- Vendor warranty
- 3 years
Power / Interface
- Board power (TBP)
- 145 W
- Power connector
- 1x 8-pin
- Recommended PSU
- 300 W
- Bus interface
- PCIe 5.0 x8
Physical / Outputs
- Length
- 199 mm
- Height
- 116 mm
- Width
- Unknown
- Slot thickness
- 2 slots
- Fans
- 2
- Cooling
- Air
- Outputs
- 3× DisplayPort · 1× HDMI
Exact board / Identity
- Board part number
- GV-N5060WF2-8GD
- Vendor warranty
- 3 years
Power / Interface
- Board power (TBP)
- 145 W
- Power connector
- 1x 8-pin
- Recommended PSU
- 300 W
- Bus interface
- PCIe 5.0 x8
Physical / Outputs
- Length
- 199 mm
- Height
- 116 mm
- Width
- Unknown
- Slot thickness
- 2 slots
- Fans
- 2
- Cooling
- Air
- Outputs
- 3× DisplayPort · 1× HDMI
Exact board / Identity
- Board part number
- GV-N5060WF2MAX OC-8GD
- Vendor warranty
- 3 years
Power / Interface
- Board power (TBP)
- 145 W
- Power connector
- 1x 8-pin
- Recommended PSU
- 300 W
- Bus interface
- PCIe 5.0 x8
Physical / Outputs
- Length
- 199 mm
- Height
- 116 mm
- Width
- Unknown
- Slot thickness
- 2 slots
- Fans
- 2
- Cooling
- Air
- Outputs
- 3× DisplayPort · 1× HDMI
Exact board / Identity
- Board part number
- GV-N5060WF2OC-8GD
- Vendor warranty
- 3 years
Power / Interface
- Board power (TBP)
- 145 W
- Power connector
- 1x 8-pin
- Recommended PSU
- 450 W
- Bus interface
- PCIe 5.0 x8
Physical / Outputs
- Length
- 248 mm
- Height
- 135 mm
- Width
- Unknown
- Slot thickness
- 2 slots
- Fans
- 2
- Cooling
- Air
- Outputs
- 3× DisplayPort · 1× HDMI
Exact board / Identity
- Board part number
- G5060-8GC
- Vendor warranty
- 3 years
Select an exact version for physical dimensions and connector details.
Show all specifications
Core / Performance
- Texture units
- 120
- ROPs
- 48
- Ray tracing cores
- 30
- Tensor cores
- 120
- Base clock
- 2280 MHz
- Boost clock
- 2497 MHz
Features
- Upscaling
- DLSS 4.5 + 5
- Frame generation
- multi-frame generation
- Ray tracing
- Supported
- RGB lighting
- No
Warranty & release
- Release year
- 2025
Hover any value to see where it came from: a manufacturer specification, or a figure The Comparator calculated.
Sources: Comparator offer frame 2026-10-24–2026-10-29
What to check in your build
Varies by version
The exact requirement depends on the version you select.
Varies by version
Select a board to confirm its connector and cable-clearance needs.
Varies by version
The exact requirement depends on the version you select.
Varies by version
The exact requirement depends on the version you select.
Varies by version
Slot occupancy depends on the board cooler and thickness.
Select an exact version above for physical dimensions and connector details.
300 W PSU recommended
Whole-system figure from the board vendor — it already allows for the processor and transient spikes.
1x 8-pin required
Adapters work but add connector bulk and need extra cable-bend clearance.
Needs at least 228 mm of GPU clearance
Front radiators and fans eat into the figure a case advertises.
Leave room beyond the card for the cable bend
No verified minimum is published — measure it.
Occupies 2 slots
The cooler covers the slots below it — check nothing adjacent needs that space.
300 W PSU recommended
Whole-system figure from the board vendor — it already allows for the processor and transient spikes.
1x 8-pin required
Adapters work but add connector bulk and need extra cable-bend clearance.
Needs at least 228 mm of GPU clearance
Front radiators and fans eat into the figure a case advertises.
Leave room beyond the card for the cable bend
No verified minimum is published — measure it.
Occupies 2 slots
The cooler covers the slots below it — check nothing adjacent needs that space.
300 W PSU recommended
Whole-system figure from the board vendor — it already allows for the processor and transient spikes.
1x 8-pin required
Adapters work but add connector bulk and need extra cable-bend clearance.
Needs at least 281 mm of GPU clearance
Front radiators and fans eat into the figure a case advertises.
Leave room beyond the card for the cable bend
No verified minimum is published — measure it.
Occupies 2 slots
The cooler covers the slots below it — check nothing adjacent needs that space.
300 W PSU recommended
Whole-system figure from the board vendor — it already allows for the processor and transient spikes.
1x 8-pin required
Adapters work but add connector bulk and need extra cable-bend clearance.
Needs at least 281 mm of GPU clearance
Front radiators and fans eat into the figure a case advertises.
Leave room beyond the card for the cable bend
No verified minimum is published — measure it.
Occupies 2 slots
The cooler covers the slots below it — check nothing adjacent needs that space.
300 W PSU recommended
Whole-system figure from the board vendor — it already allows for the processor and transient spikes.
1x 8-pin required
Adapters work but add connector bulk and need extra cable-bend clearance.
Needs at least 199 mm of GPU clearance
Front radiators and fans eat into the figure a case advertises.
Leave room beyond the card for the cable bend
No verified minimum is published — measure it.
Occupies 2 slots
The cooler covers the slots below it — check nothing adjacent needs that space.
300 W PSU recommended
Whole-system figure from the board vendor — it already allows for the processor and transient spikes.
1x 8-pin required
Adapters work but add connector bulk and need extra cable-bend clearance.
Needs at least 199 mm of GPU clearance
Front radiators and fans eat into the figure a case advertises.
Leave room beyond the card for the cable bend
No verified minimum is published — measure it.
Occupies 2 slots
The cooler covers the slots below it — check nothing adjacent needs that space.
300 W PSU recommended
Whole-system figure from the board vendor — it already allows for the processor and transient spikes.
1x 8-pin required
Adapters work but add connector bulk and need extra cable-bend clearance.
Needs at least 199 mm of GPU clearance
Front radiators and fans eat into the figure a case advertises.
Leave room beyond the card for the cable bend
No verified minimum is published — measure it.
Occupies 2 slots
The cooler covers the slots below it — check nothing adjacent needs that space.
450 W PSU recommended
Whole-system figure from the board vendor — it already allows for the processor and transient spikes.
1x 8-pin required
Adapters work but add connector bulk and need extra cable-bend clearance.
Needs at least 248 mm of GPU clearance
Front radiators and fans eat into the figure a case advertises.
Leave room beyond the card for the cable bend
No verified minimum is published — measure it.
Occupies 2 slots
The cooler covers the slots below it — check nothing adjacent needs that space.
Compare all 8 board variants
| Variant | Length | Slot thickness | Power connector | Recommended PSU |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ASUS DUAL RTX 5060 | 228 mm | 2 | 1x 8-pin | 300 W |
| ASUS DUAL RTX 5060 White OC Edition | 228 mm | 2 | 1x 8-pin | 300 W |
| GIGABYTE RTX 5060 AERO OC | 281 mm | 2 | 1x 8-pin | 300 W |
| GIGABYTE RTX 5060 GAMING OC | 281 mm | 2 | 1x 8-pin | 300 W |
| GIGABYTE RTX 5060 WINDFORCE | 199 mm | 2 | 1x 8-pin | 300 W |
| GIGABYTE RTX 5060 WINDFORCE MAX OC | 199 mm | 2 | 1x 8-pin | 300 W |
| GIGABYTE RTX 5060 WINDFORCE OC | 199 mm | 2 | 1x 8-pin | 300 W |
| MSI RTX 5060 GAMING OC | 248 mm | 2 | 1x 8-pin | 450 W |
Found an error? Report this specification Email the field, corrected value and an optional source.
Compatibility guidance is practical help, not a score. Missing data is shown as unknown, never invented.
Summary
RTX 5060 offers a balanced view across an all-round mix of priorities. It ranks #28 by capability in the current modelled field. Its clearest measured strength is raster index 730. The main limitation appears when 4K / VR becomes the priority, where it grades D.
RTX 5060 offers A-grade capability for 1080p. It ranks #28 by capability in the current modelled field. Its clearest measured strength is raster index 730. The main limitation appears when 4K / VR becomes the priority, where it grades D.
RTX 5060 offers B-grade capability for 1440p. It ranks #28 by capability in the current modelled field. Its clearest measured strength is raster index 730. The main limitation appears when 4K / VR becomes the priority, where it grades D.
RTX 5060 offers D-grade capability for 4K. It ranks #28 by capability in the current modelled field. Its clearest measured strength is raster index 730. The D grade is the decisive limitation for this workload.
RTX 5060 offers C-grade capability for Ray Tracing @ 1080p. It ranks #24 by capability in the current modelled field. Its clearest measured strength is ray-tracing index 745. The C grade is the decisive limitation for this workload.
RTX 5060 offers D-grade capability for Ray Tracing @ 1440p. It ranks #24 by capability in the current modelled field. Its clearest measured strength is ray-tracing index 745. The D grade is the decisive limitation for this workload.
RTX 5060 offers F-grade capability for Ray Tracing @ 4K. It ranks #28 by capability in the current modelled field. Its clearest measured strength is ray-tracing index 745. The F grade is the decisive limitation for this workload.
RTX 5060 offers C-grade capability for AI. It ranks #29 by capability in the current modelled field. Its clearest measured strength is ai compute index 329. The C grade is the decisive limitation for this workload.
RTX 5060 offers C-grade capability for 3D Rendering. It ranks #18 by capability in the current modelled field. Its clearest measured strength is raster index 730. The C grade is the decisive limitation for this workload.
RTX 5060 offers B-grade capability for Light Use. It ranks #9 by capability in the current modelled field. Its clearest measured strength is raster index 730. RX 7600 currently clears the same practical bar with stronger Relative Value.
FAQ
Do all RTX 5060 boards have the same physical design?
No. Dimensions, slot thickness, cooling, power connectors and display outputs belong to the exact board. Use the Exact version selector before checking case or PSU fit.
How much case clearance should I allow for the RTX 5060?
Tracked boards range from 199 to 281 mm in length. Select the exact board, then also allow for front radiators or fans, card height, slot thickness and power-cable bend; length alone does not guarantee fit.
Why does Relative Value change when I choose another scenario?
Each scenario changes the weights applied to capability, price and the other published factors. The hardware facts stay fixed, but the value question changes, so its score and rank can change too.
Why can Amazon appear without a tracked price?
Amazon listing snapshots can participate in Value while fresh. We show Check on Amazon instead of its price; confirm the current price and availability at the store. When no current listing snapshot exists, Amazon is a search link only.
Useful links & sources
offer frame 2026-10-24–2026-10-29 · formula gpu-value-v1.4 · facts facts-2026-10-29 · Relative Value is an estimate from our current dataset, the selected weights and dated market prices — not an official product rating and not a price forecast. Target prices are calculation thresholds, not predictions. Methodology We are not a shop. Affiliate links may earn us a commission; they never change the calculations or the ranking.