RTX 5060 Ti 8GB
The current RTX 5060 Ti 8GB price from retailers, its key specifications, and how it performs for each job.
NVIDIA · GPU · RTX 50
Retailer photo of GIGABYTE RTX 5060 Ti EAGLE OC. View this offer in Where to buy
Works well for: 1080p Gaming
Trade-offs: Current price sits CAD 50 above the strong-value threshold (~CAD 690)
- Memory bandwidth
- 448 GB/s
- Board power
- 180 W
- Architecture
- Blackwell 2.0
- Interface
- PCIe 5.0 x8
Move a slider and the page re-scores this product against the same market frame.
What does it cost today, and is that a good price?
Market confidence: MediumAt CAD 740 the RTX 5060 Ti 8GB is priced 34% below its CAD 1117 representative market level. RX 9060 XT 16GB currently does the same job for CAD 730.
Consider: RX 9070 GRE offers stronger value around CAD 750.Compare
Prices & availability
RTX 5060 Ti 8GB: current price and offers
Compare the offers we track for this model, across variants and retailers.
5 tracked offers · 2 retailers
| Variant | Store | Condition | Price (snapshot) | Value · Balanced | Checked | Offer link |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GIGABYTE RTX 5060 Ti EAGLE OC | Newegg | New | CAD 740 | 76 | 2026-10-29 | View offer → |
| ASUS PRIME RTX 5060 Ti | Newegg | New | CAD 745 | 76 | 2026-10-29 | View offer → |
| GIGABYTE RTX 5060 Ti WINDFORCE OC | Amazon | New | Check on Amazon | 70 | 2026-10-29 | View offer → |
| ASUS TUF Gaming RTX 5060 Ti | Newegg | New | CAD 1,489 | 47 | 2026-10-28 | View offer → |
| ASUS DUAL RTX 5060 Ti | Newegg | New | CAD 1,600 | 44 | 2026-10-29 | View offer → |
| RTX 5060 Ti 8GBMultiple variants available | Amazon Affiliate | Varies | Find on Amazon | Not tracked | No price snapshot | Find on Amazon → |
Prices are dated snapshots, not live quotes — confirm the final price at the store. New, refurbished and used offers are listed separately; used offers carry warranty and seller risk.
Performance and where it ranks
Two different questions, side by side. Performance compares what the hardware can do; Value compares what that capability costs at today’s price. A product can rank high on one and low on the other — that gap is the point.
Performance Balanced
How much it can do. Price plays no part in this ranking.
#23 of 40 graded graphics cards
- #20 IntelIntel Arc Pro B70 42
- #21 AMDRX 9060 XT 16GB 40
- #22 AMDRX 9060 XT 8GB 40
- #23 NVIDIARTX 5060 Ti 8GB 36
- #24 NVIDIARTX 5060 Ti 16GB 36
- #25 AMDRX 7700 XT 35
- #26 NVIDIARTX 3070 Ti 34
Value Balanced
How much of that you get for today’s price.
#11 of 41 currently priced graphics cards
- #8 NVIDIARTX 5070 81
- #9 NVIDIARTX 4080 Super 77
- #10 NVIDIARTX 5070 Ti 76
- #11 NVIDIARTX 5060 Ti 8GB 76
- #12 NVIDIARTX 5060 74
- #13 NVIDIARTX 4070 71
- #14 AMDRX 7800 XT 71
Performance 1080p
How much it can do. Price plays no part in this ranking.
#23 of 40 graded graphics cards
- #20 IntelIntel Arc Pro B70 42
- #21 AMDRX 9060 XT 16GB 40
- #22 AMDRX 9060 XT 8GB 40
- #23 NVIDIARTX 5060 Ti 8GB 36
- #24 NVIDIARTX 5060 Ti 16GB 36
- #25 AMDRX 7700 XT 35
- #26 NVIDIARTX 3070 Ti 34
Value 1080p
How much of that you get for today’s price.
#6 of 41 currently priced graphics cards
- #3 AMDRX 9060 XT 8GB 97
- #4 AMDRX 9070 XT 93
- #5 AMDRX 9070 89
- #6 NVIDIARTX 5060 Ti 8GB 81
- #7 NVIDIARTX 5060 80
- #8 NVIDIARTX 4070 Super 79
- #9 NVIDIARTX 5070 75
Performance 1440p
How much it can do. Price plays no part in this ranking.
#23 of 40 graded graphics cards
- #20 IntelIntel Arc Pro B70 42
- #21 AMDRX 9060 XT 16GB 40
- #22 AMDRX 9060 XT 8GB 40
- #23 NVIDIARTX 5060 Ti 8GB 36
- #24 NVIDIARTX 5060 Ti 16GB 36
- #25 AMDRX 7700 XT 35
- #26 NVIDIARTX 3070 Ti 34
Value 1440p
How much of that you get for today’s price.
#14 of 41 currently priced graphics cards
- #11 NVIDIARTX 5080 72
- #12 AMDRX 9060 XT 8GB 66
- #13 NVIDIARTX 5090 62
- #14 NVIDIARTX 5060 Ti 8GB 60
- #15 AMDRX 7900 XT 60
- #16 NVIDIARTX 4070 60
- #17 AMDRX 7800 XT 60
Performance 4K
How much it can do. Price plays no part in this ranking.
#23 of 40 graded graphics cards
- #20 IntelIntel Arc Pro B70 42
- #21 AMDRX 9060 XT 16GB 40
- #22 AMDRX 9060 XT 8GB 40
- #23 NVIDIARTX 5060 Ti 8GB 36
- #24 NVIDIARTX 5060 Ti 16GB 36
- #25 AMDRX 7700 XT 35
- #26 NVIDIARTX 3070 Ti 34
Value 4K
How much of that you get for today’s price.
#22 of 41 currently priced graphics cards
- #19 NVIDIARTX 5060 Ti 16GB 40
- #20 NVIDIARTX 4070 39
- #21 AMDRX 9060 XT 8GB 34
- #22 NVIDIARTX 5060 Ti 8GB 33
- #23 AMDRX 7700 XT 30
- #24 NVIDIARTX 5060 29
- #25 NVIDIARTX PRO 4000 Blackwell 23
Performance Ray Tracing @ 1080p
How much it can do. Price plays no part in this ranking.
#20 of 35 graded graphics cards
- #17 AMDRX 7900 GRE 46
- #18 NVIDIARTX 5060 Ti 16GB 45
- #19 AMDRX 7800 XT 39
- #20 NVIDIARTX 5060 Ti 8GB 37
- #21 AMDRX 9060 XT 16GB 36
- #22 NVIDIARTX 3070 Ti 33
- #23 AMDRX 7700 XT 33
Value Ray Tracing @ 1080p
How much of that you get for today’s price.
#12 of 41 currently priced graphics cards
- #9 NVIDIARTX 4070 Super 76
- #10 AMDRX 9060 XT 16GB 72
- #11 NVIDIARTX 4090 71
- #12 NVIDIARTX 5060 Ti 8GB 66
- #13 NVIDIARTX 5090 62
- #14 NVIDIARTX 4070 Ti 62
- #15 NVIDIARTX 5060 61
Performance Ray Tracing @ 1440p
How much it can do. Price plays no part in this ranking.
#22 of 35 graded graphics cards
- #19 AMDRX 7800 XT 33
- #20 AMDRX 9060 XT 16GB 31
- #21 NVIDIARTX 3070 Ti 27
- #22 NVIDIARTX 5060 Ti 8GB 26
- #23 AMDRX 7700 XT 25
- #24 NVIDIARTX 5060 24
- #25 NVIDIARTX 3060 Ti 22
Value Ray Tracing @ 1440p
How much of that you get for today’s price.
#14 of 41 currently priced graphics cards
- #11 NVIDIARTX 5090 71
- #12 AMDRX 9060 XT 16GB 68
- #13 NVIDIARTX 4070 Ti 59
- #14 NVIDIARTX 5060 Ti 8GB 59
- #15 NVIDIARTX 4080 58
- #16 NVIDIARTX 4070 57
- #17 NVIDIARTX 5060 Ti 16GB 55
Performance Ray Tracing @ 4K
How much it can do. Price plays no part in this ranking.
#27 of 35 graded graphics cards
- #24 AMDRX 6700 XT 12
- #25 NVIDIARTX 3060 Ti 12
- #26 AMDRX 9060 XT 8GB 11
- #27 NVIDIARTX 5060 Ti 8GB 11
- #28 NVIDIARTX 5060 11
- #29 NVIDIARTX 4060 11
- #30 NVIDIARTX 5050 10
Value Ray Tracing @ 4K
How much of that you get for today’s price.
#21 of 41 currently priced graphics cards
- #18 NVIDIARTX 4070 36
- #19 AMDRX 7900 GRE 36
- #20 AMDRX 7800 XT 34
- #21 NVIDIARTX 5060 Ti 8GB 31
- #22 NVIDIARTX 5060 27
- #23 AMDRX 7700 XT 26
- #24 AMDRX 9060 XT 8GB 24
Performance AI
How much it can do. Price plays no part in this ranking.
#24 of 39 graded graphics cards
- #21 AMDRX 9060 XT 16GB 12
- #22 AMDRX 9060 XT 8GB 12
- #23 NVIDIARTX 3060 12GB 12
- #24 NVIDIARTX 5060 Ti 8GB 11
- #25 NVIDIARTX 5060 Ti 16GB 11
- #26 AMDRX 7900 GRE 11
- #27 NVIDIARTX 3050 6GB 11
Value AI
How much of that you get for today’s price.
#27 of 41 currently priced graphics cards
- #24 NVIDIARTX 3060 12GB 9
- #25 AMDRX 9060 XT 8GB 9
- #26 AMDRX 7800 XT 8
- #27 NVIDIARTX 5060 Ti 8GB 8
- #28 IntelIntel Arc Pro B70 7
- #29 NVIDIARTX 3060 Ti 7
- #30 NVIDIARTX 5060 6
Performance 3D Rendering
How much it can do. Price plays no part in this ranking.
#14 of 37 graded graphics cards
- #11 NVIDIARTX 4070 41
- #12 NVIDIARTX 4070 Super 40
- #13 NVIDIARTX 4060 Ti 8GB 28
- #14 NVIDIARTX 5060 Ti 8GB 28
- #15 NVIDIARTX 5060 Ti 16GB 28
- #16 AMDRX 7900 XTX 27
- #17 AMDRX 7900 XT 24
Value 3D Rendering
How much of that you get for today’s price.
#23 of 41 currently priced graphics cards
- #20 AMDRX 7900 XT 14
- #21 NVIDIARTX 3070 Ti 13
- #22 NVIDIARTX 4060 Ti 8GB 13
- #23 NVIDIARTX 5060 Ti 8GB 13
- #24 AMDRX 7900 GRE 12
- #25 AMDRX 7800 XT 11
- #26 NVIDIARTX 5060 10
Performance Light Use
How much it can do. Price plays no part in this ranking.
#16 of 39 graded graphics cards
- #13 AMDRX 6600 XT 78
- #14 AMDRX 7600 77
- #15 NVIDIARTX 3060 12GB 76
- #16 NVIDIARTX 5060 Ti 8GB 73
- #17 NVIDIARTX 5060 Ti 16GB 73
- #18 NVIDIARTX 4070 68
- #19 NVIDIARTX 3060 Ti 68
Value Light Use
How much of that you get for today’s price.
#10 of 41 currently priced graphics cards
- #7 AMDRX 6500 XT 4GB 58
- #8 AMDRX 7600 57
- #9 NVIDIARTX 4060 52
- #10 NVIDIARTX 5060 Ti 8GB 52
- #11 NVIDIARTX A2000 47
- #12 AMDRX 9070 GRE 47
- #13 NVIDIARTX 3050 8GB 43
These ladders follow the preset scenario shown above. Your own weights re-score this product, not the whole field.
What it is good for
| Scenario | this productCapability grade · Value at current price | Higher capability | Higher Value with current priorities |
|---|---|---|---|
| Balanced (all-round)Weighted all-round view | GradeNo grade Value76 | Higher capability RX 9070 GRE 95 +21% capability · +1% price | Higher Value with current priorities RX 9060 XT 16GB 97 +12% capability · -1% price |
| 1080p GamingRaster performance · 1080p | GradeA Value81 | Higher capability RX 9070 GRE S 100 +21% capability · +1% price | Higher Value with current priorities RX 9060 XT 16GB A 100 +12% capability · -1% price |
| 1440p GamingRaster performance · 1440p | GradeB Value60 | Higher capability RX 9070 GRE A 83 +21% capability · +1% price | Higher Value with current priorities RX 9060 XT 16GB A 83 +12% capability · -1% price |
| 4K / VRRaster performance · 4K / VR | GradeC Value33 | Higher capability RX 9070 GRE C 51 +21% capability · +1% price | Higher Value with current priorities RX 9060 XT 16GB C 52 +12% capability · -1% price |
| Ray Tracing @ 1080pRay tracing capability · 1080p | GradeB Value66 | Higher capability Higher capability · Higher Value with current priorities RX 9070 GRE B 80 +27% capability · +1% price | |
| Ray Tracing @ 1440pRay tracing capability · 1440p | GradeD Value59 | Higher capability Higher capability · Higher Value with current priorities RX 9070 GRE C 75 +40% capability · +1% price | |
| Ray Tracing @ 4KRay tracing capability · 4K | GradeF Value31 | Higher capability Higher capability · Higher Value with current priorities RX 9070 GRE F 44 +115% capability · +1% price | |
| AI / Local LLMAI compute · memory and ecosystem fit | GradeC Value8 | Higher capability RX 9070 GRE B 16 ⚠ not a drop-in swap +44% capability · +1% price | Higher Value with current priorities RX 9060 XT 16GB B 16 ⚠ not a drop-in swap +8% capability · -1% price |
| 3D Rendering3D rendering · creator workloads | GradeB Value13 | — | — |
| Light Use & EfficiencyEfficiency · lighter workloads | GradeB Value52 | Higher capability Higher capability · Higher Value with current priorities RTX 3050 6GB S 100 +37% capability · -19% price | |
Balanced has no letter: it is a weighting preset, not a capability rubric. A grade answers “how well does this handle that job?” — price is never part of it. Relative Value puts the current market price back in.
Compare these grades with the full tier list
Browse shortlists for different uses
Trade-offs
Works well if
- 1080p Gaming is your main prioritygraded A for 1080p Gaming on the same rubric as the tier list
- Strong-value threshold: ~CAD 690CAD 690 is where Relative Value reaches 80 with Balanced priorities, in the 2026-10-24–2026-10-29 offer frame
- You want memory headroom — memory is not what limits it hereno memory cap applies to this grade — the raster index sets it, not the frame buffer
Consider other options if
- Current price sits CAD 50 above the strong-value threshold (~CAD 690)cheapest tracked CAD 740 against a CAD 690 calculated threshold with Balanced priorities
- Value for money matters more to you than this exact modelRX 9060 XT 16GB holds Relative Value 97 against its 76 with Balanced priorities, at CAD 730
- Not the pick if Ray Tracing @ 2K (1440p) is your main useit grades only D there
Works well if
- 1080p is your main priority — A here means confident 90–120 fps at high settingsgraded A for 1080p on the same rubric as the tier list
- Today's price already clears the strong-value markcheapest tracked CAD 740 against a CAD 753 threshold for 1080p
- You want memory headroom — memory is not what limits it hereno memory cap applies to this grade for 1080p — the raster index sets it, not the frame buffer
Consider other options if
- Value for money matters more to you than this exact modelRX 9060 XT 16GB holds Relative Value 100 against its 81 for 1080p, at CAD 730
- Not the pick if Ray Tracing @ 2K (1440p) is your main useit grades only D there
Works well if
- 1440p is your main priority — B here means solid 60 fps at high settingsgraded B for 1440p on the same rubric as the tier list
- Strong-value threshold: ~CAD 509CAD 509 is where Relative Value reaches 80 for 1440p, in the 2026-10-24–2026-10-29 offer frame
- You want memory headroom — 8 GB is above what this job needsthe same card with 6 GB grades C for 1440p; this one has 8 GB and hits no memory cap
Consider other options if
- Current price sits CAD 231 above the strong-value threshold (~CAD 509)cheapest tracked CAD 740 against a CAD 509 calculated threshold for 1440p
- Value for money matters more to you than this exact modelRX 9060 XT 16GB holds Relative Value 83 against its 60 for 1440p, at CAD 730
- Not the pick if Ray Tracing @ 2K (1440p) is your main useit grades only D there
For the selected scenario this is not a strong fit — the grade above is the reason, and the models below suit it better.
Works well if
- 4K is not actually your main job — 1080p Gaming isit grades C for 4K, but A for 1080p Gaming
Consider other options if
- Not the pick if 4K is your main useit grades C there; RX 9070 GRE grades C at CAD 750
- You want strong value for 4K specificallycompeting products deliver so much more for 4K per dollar that no price this model realistically trades at reaches the strong-value mark for this job
- Value for money matters more to you than this exact modelRX 9060 XT 16GB holds Relative Value 52 against its 33 for 4K, at CAD 730
Works well if
- Ray Tracing @ 1080p is your main priority — B here means below target; heavy upscaling onlygraded B for Ray Tracing @ 1080p on the same rubric as the tier list, from 46 fps measured natively (upscaling typically adds 40–60% on top)
- Strong-value threshold: ~CAD 564CAD 564 is where Relative Value reaches 80 for Ray Tracing @ 1080p, in the 2026-10-24–2026-10-29 offer frame
- You want memory headroom — memory is not what limits it hereno memory cap applies to this grade for Ray Tracing @ 1080p — the raster index sets it, not the frame buffer
Consider other options if
- Current price sits CAD 176 above the strong-value threshold (~CAD 564)cheapest tracked CAD 740 against a CAD 564 calculated threshold for Ray Tracing @ 1080p
- Not the pick if Ray Tracing @ 2K (1440p) is your main useit grades only D there
For the selected scenario this is not a strong fit — the grade above is the reason, and the models below suit it better.
Works well if
- Ray Tracing @ 1440p is not actually your main job — 1080p Gaming isit grades D for Ray Tracing @ 1440p, but A for 1080p Gaming
Consider other options if
- Not the pick if Ray Tracing @ 1440p is your main useit grades D there; RX 9070 GRE grades C at CAD 750
- You want strong value for Ray Tracing @ 1440p specificallyat today's market no realistic price for this model reaches strong value for Ray Tracing @ 1440p — the calculation only gets there near CAD 474, against a cheapest tracked CAD 740
For the selected scenario this is not a strong fit — the grade above is the reason, and the models below suit it better.
Works well if
- Ray Tracing @ 4K is not actually your main job — 1080p Gaming isit grades F for Ray Tracing @ 4K, but A for 1080p Gaming
Consider other options if
- Not the pick if Ray Tracing @ 4K is your main useit grades F there; RX 9070 GRE grades F at CAD 750
- You want strong value for Ray Tracing @ 4K specificallycompeting products deliver so much more for Ray Tracing @ 4K per dollar that no price this model realistically trades at reaches the strong-value mark for this job
For the selected scenario this is not a strong fit — the grade above is the reason, and the models below suit it better.
Works well if
- AI is not actually your main job — 1080p Gaming isit grades C for AI, but A for 1080p Gaming
Consider other options if
- Not the pick if AI is your main useit grades C there; RX 9070 GRE grades B at CAD 750
- You want strong value for AI specificallycompeting products deliver so much more for AI per dollar that no price this model realistically trades at reaches the strong-value mark for this job
- Value for money matters more to you than this exact modelRX 9060 XT 16GB holds Relative Value 16 against its 8 for AI, at CAD 730
Works well if
- 3D Rendering is your main prioritygraded B for 3D Rendering on the same rubric as the tier list
- You want memory headroom — 8 GB is above what this job needsthe same card with 6 GB grades C for 3D Rendering; this one has 8 GB and hits no memory cap
- DLSS 4.5 + 5 with multi-frame generation matters to yousecond-generation transformer upscaler + dynamic multi-frame generation; DLSS 5 in supporting games — derived from the blackwell architecture, not from a scraped feature flag
Consider other options if
- You want strong value for 3D Rendering specificallycompeting products deliver so much more for 3D Rendering per dollar that no price this model realistically trades at reaches the strong-value mark for this job
- Not the pick if Ray Tracing @ 2K (1440p) is your main useit grades only D there
Works well if
- Light Use is your main prioritygraded B for Light Use on the same rubric as the tier list
- You want memory headroom — memory is not what limits it hereno memory cap applies to this grade for Light Use — the raster index sets it, not the frame buffer
- DLSS 4.5 + 5 with multi-frame generation matters to yousecond-generation transformer upscaler + dynamic multi-frame generation; DLSS 5 in supporting games — derived from the blackwell architecture, not from a scraped feature flag
Consider other options if
- You want strong value for Light Use specificallyat today's market no realistic price for this model reaches strong value for Light Use — the calculation only gets there near CAD 418, against a cheapest tracked CAD 740
- Value for money matters more to you than this exact modelRTX 3050 6GB holds Relative Value 100 against its 52 for Light Use, at CAD 600
- Not the pick if Ray Tracing @ 2K (1440p) is your main useit grades only D there
Every line states the fact it was derived from, for the scenario selected above. Thresholds are calculated points on our value curve — information about where the maths turns, not instructions about what to pay.
Similar options to the RTX 5060 Ti 8GB
Chosen for Balanced
Chosen for 1080p
Chosen for 1440p
Chosen for 4K
Chosen for Ray Tracing @ 1080p
Chosen for Ray Tracing @ 1440p
Chosen for Ray Tracing @ 4K
Chosen for AI
This scenario carries a requirement candidates are checked against first: CUDA — Many local-LLM and diffusion toolchains are CUDA-only. ROCm and Vulkan builds exist and work, but they are not drop-in — check your toolchain before treating a non-NVIDIA card as an equivalent swap.
Chosen for 3D Rendering
This scenario carries a requirement candidates are checked against first: OptiX — Blender Cycles reaches its fastest path on NVIDIA OptiX. HIP (AMD) and oneAPI (Intel) render the same scenes, so this is a workflow question, not a capability wall — but render times and add-on support differ.
Chosen for Light Use
Alternatives stay near this product’s price range. Step-up options may exceed the standard budget envelope when the capability gain is meaningful.
More head-to-head comparisons in this category
Upgrade planner
Judge the change in the active scenario, then make the cash gap explicit.
Using page scenarioWhat are you upgrading from? These are the axes we compare on, and where this product stands in the current market.
We rank upgrades by out-of-pocket cost — the new price minus what yours is worth — not by sticker price.
Only candidates that clear the configured meaningful-upgrade gate will be shown; roles are omitted rather than filled.
Capability differences are expressed as tiers and index points, not as benchmark percentages we did not measure.
Specifications and compatibility
What this product is, and what to check before it goes into your build.
Core / Performance
- Architecture
- Blackwell 2.0
- GPU chip
- GB206
- GPU variant
- GB206-300-A1
- Process node
- 5 nm
- Transistors
- 21,900 million
- Shading units
- 4608
Memory
Power / Interface
- Board power (TBP)
- 180 W
- Power connector
- Varies by version
- Recommended PSU
- Varies by version
- Bus interface
- PCIe 5.0 x8
Physical / Outputs
- Length
- Varies by version208–304 mm across tracked variants
- Height
- Varies by version120–134 mm across tracked variants
- Width
- Varies by version
- Slot thickness
- Varies by version2–3 across tracked variants
- Fans
- Varies by version2–3 across tracked variants
- Cooling
- Varies by version
- Outputs
- Varies by version
Power / Interface
- Board power (TBP)
- 180 W
- Power connector
- 1x 8-pin
- Recommended PSU
- 450 W
- Bus interface
- PCIe 5.0 x8
Physical / Outputs
- Length
- 229 mm
- Height
- 120 mm
- Width
- Unknown
- Slot thickness
- 2 slots
- Fans
- 2
- Cooling
- Air
- Outputs
- 3× DisplayPort · 1× HDMI
Exact board / Identity
- Board part number
- DUAL-RTX5060TI-8G
- Vendor warranty
- 3 years
Power / Interface
- Board power (TBP)
- 180 W
- Power connector
- 1x 8-pin
- Recommended PSU
- 450 W
- Bus interface
- PCIe 5.0 x8
Physical / Outputs
- Length
- 304 mm
- Height
- 120 mm
- Width
- Unknown
- Slot thickness
- 2 slots
- Fans
- 2
- Cooling
- Air
- Outputs
- 3× DisplayPort · 1× HDMI
Exact board / Identity
- Board part number
- PRIME-RTX5060TI-8G
- Vendor warranty
- 3 years
Power / Interface
- Board power (TBP)
- 180 W
- Power connector
- 1x 16-pin
- Recommended PSU
- 450 W
- Bus interface
- PCIe 5.0 x8
Physical / Outputs
- Length
- 302 mm
- Height
- 134 mm
- Width
- Unknown
- Slot thickness
- 3 slots
- Fans
- 3
- Cooling
- Air
- Outputs
- 3× DisplayPort · 1× HDMI
Exact board / Identity
- Board part number
- TUF-RTX5060TI-8G-GAMING
- Vendor warranty
- 3 years
Power / Interface
- Board power (TBP)
- 180 W
- Power connector
- 1x 8-pin
- Recommended PSU
- 450 W
- Bus interface
- PCIe 5.0 x8
Physical / Outputs
- Length
- 215 mm
- Height
- 122 mm
- Width
- Unknown
- Slot thickness
- 2 slots
- Fans
- 2
- Cooling
- Air
- Outputs
- 3× DisplayPort · 1× HDMI
Exact board / Identity
- Board part number
- GV-N506TEAGLE OC-8GD
- Vendor warranty
- 3 years
Power / Interface
- Board power (TBP)
- 180 W
- Power connector
- 1x 8-pin
- Recommended PSU
- 450 W
- Bus interface
- PCIe 5.0 x8
Physical / Outputs
- Length
- 208 mm
- Height
- 120 mm
- Width
- Unknown
- Slot thickness
- 2 slots
- Fans
- 2
- Cooling
- Air
- Outputs
- 3× DisplayPort · 1× HDMI
Exact board / Identity
- Board part number
- GV-N506TWF2OC-8GD
- Vendor warranty
- 3 years
Select an exact version for physical dimensions and connector details.
Show all specifications
Core / Performance
- Texture units
- 144
- ROPs
- 48
- Ray tracing cores
- 36
- Tensor cores
- 144
- Base clock
- 2407 MHz
- Boost clock
- 2617 MHz
Features
- Upscaling
- DLSS 4.5 + 5
- Frame generation
- multi-frame generation
- Ray tracing
- Supported
- RGB lighting
- No
Warranty & release
- Release year
- 2025
Hover any value to see where it came from: a manufacturer specification, or a figure The Comparator calculated.
Sources: Comparator offer frame 2026-10-24–2026-10-29
What to check in your build
Varies by version
The exact requirement depends on the version you select.
Varies by version
Select a board to confirm its connector and cable-clearance needs.
Varies by version
The exact requirement depends on the version you select.
Varies by version
The exact requirement depends on the version you select.
Varies by version
Slot occupancy depends on the board cooler and thickness.
Select an exact version above for physical dimensions and connector details.
450 W PSU recommended
Whole-system figure from the board vendor — it already allows for the processor and transient spikes.
1x 8-pin required
Adapters work but add connector bulk and need extra cable-bend clearance.
Needs at least 229 mm of GPU clearance
Front radiators and fans eat into the figure a case advertises.
Leave room beyond the card for the cable bend
No verified minimum is published — measure it.
Occupies 2 slots
The cooler covers the slots below it — check nothing adjacent needs that space.
450 W PSU recommended
Whole-system figure from the board vendor — it already allows for the processor and transient spikes.
1x 8-pin required
Adapters work but add connector bulk and need extra cable-bend clearance.
Needs at least 304 mm of GPU clearance
Front radiators and fans eat into the figure a case advertises.
Leave room beyond the card for the cable bend
No verified minimum is published — measure it.
Occupies 2 slots
The cooler covers the slots below it — check nothing adjacent needs that space.
450 W PSU recommended
Whole-system figure from the board vendor — it already allows for the processor and transient spikes.
1x 16-pin required
Adapters work but add connector bulk and need extra cable-bend clearance.
Needs at least 302 mm of GPU clearance
Front radiators and fans eat into the figure a case advertises.
Leave room beyond the card for the cable bend
No verified minimum is published — measure it.
Occupies 3 slots
The cooler covers the slots below it — check nothing adjacent needs that space.
450 W PSU recommended
Whole-system figure from the board vendor — it already allows for the processor and transient spikes.
1x 8-pin required
Adapters work but add connector bulk and need extra cable-bend clearance.
Needs at least 215 mm of GPU clearance
Front radiators and fans eat into the figure a case advertises.
Leave room beyond the card for the cable bend
No verified minimum is published — measure it.
Occupies 2 slots
The cooler covers the slots below it — check nothing adjacent needs that space.
450 W PSU recommended
Whole-system figure from the board vendor — it already allows for the processor and transient spikes.
1x 8-pin required
Adapters work but add connector bulk and need extra cable-bend clearance.
Needs at least 208 mm of GPU clearance
Front radiators and fans eat into the figure a case advertises.
Leave room beyond the card for the cable bend
No verified minimum is published — measure it.
Occupies 2 slots
The cooler covers the slots below it — check nothing adjacent needs that space.
Compare all 5 board variants
| Variant | Length | Slot thickness | Power connector | Recommended PSU |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ASUS DUAL RTX 5060 Ti | 229 mm | 2 | 1x 8-pin | 450 W |
| ASUS PRIME RTX 5060 Ti | 304 mm | 2 | 1x 8-pin | 450 W |
| ASUS TUF Gaming RTX 5060 Ti | 302 mm | 3 | 1x 16-pin | 450 W |
| GIGABYTE RTX 5060 Ti EAGLE OC | 215 mm | 2 | 1x 8-pin | 450 W |
| GIGABYTE RTX 5060 Ti WINDFORCE OC | 208 mm | 2 | 1x 8-pin | 450 W |
Found an error? Report this specification Email the field, corrected value and an optional source.
Compatibility guidance is practical help, not a score. Missing data is shown as unknown, never invented.
Summary
RTX 5060 Ti 8GB offers a balanced view across an all-round mix of priorities. It ranks #23 by capability in the current modelled field. Its clearest measured strength is raster index 850. The main limitation appears when Ray Tracing @ 2K (1440p) becomes the priority, where it grades D.
RTX 5060 Ti 8GB offers A-grade capability for 1080p. It ranks #23 by capability in the current modelled field. Its clearest measured strength is raster index 850. The main limitation appears when Ray Tracing @ 2K (1440p) becomes the priority, where it grades D.
RTX 5060 Ti 8GB offers B-grade capability for 1440p. It ranks #23 by capability in the current modelled field. Its clearest measured strength is raster index 850. The main limitation appears when Ray Tracing @ 2K (1440p) becomes the priority, where it grades D.
RTX 5060 Ti 8GB offers C-grade capability for 4K. It ranks #23 by capability in the current modelled field. Its clearest measured strength is raster index 850. The C grade is the decisive limitation for this workload.
RTX 5060 Ti 8GB offers B-grade capability for Ray Tracing @ 1080p. It ranks #20 by capability in the current modelled field. Its clearest measured strength is ray-tracing index 867. The main limitation appears when Ray Tracing @ 2K (1440p) becomes the priority, where it grades D.
RTX 5060 Ti 8GB offers D-grade capability for Ray Tracing @ 1440p. It ranks #22 by capability in the current modelled field. Its clearest measured strength is ray-tracing index 867. The D grade is the decisive limitation for this workload.
RTX 5060 Ti 8GB offers F-grade capability for Ray Tracing @ 4K. It ranks #27 by capability in the current modelled field. Its clearest measured strength is ray-tracing index 867. The F grade is the decisive limitation for this workload.
RTX 5060 Ti 8GB offers C-grade capability for AI. It ranks #24 by capability in the current modelled field. Its clearest measured strength is ai compute index 407. The C grade is the decisive limitation for this workload.
RTX 5060 Ti 8GB offers B-grade capability for 3D Rendering. It ranks #14 by capability in the current modelled field. Its clearest measured strength is raster index 850. The main limitation appears when Ray Tracing @ 2K (1440p) becomes the priority, where it grades D.
RTX 5060 Ti 8GB offers B-grade capability for Light Use. It ranks #16 by capability in the current modelled field. Its clearest measured strength is raster index 850. RTX 5060 currently clears the same practical bar with stronger Relative Value.
FAQ
Do all RTX 5060 Ti 8GB boards have the same physical design?
No. Dimensions, slot thickness, cooling, power connectors and display outputs belong to the exact board. Use the Exact version selector before checking case or PSU fit.
How much case clearance should I allow for the RTX 5060 Ti 8GB?
Tracked boards range from 208 to 304 mm in length. Select the exact board, then also allow for front radiators or fans, card height, slot thickness and power-cable bend; length alone does not guarantee fit.
Do all RTX 5060 Ti 8GB boards use the same power connector?
No. Tracked versions use 1x 8-pin or 1x 16-pin. The connector shown in Specifications & compatibility changes with the exact board selection.
Why does Relative Value change when I choose another scenario?
Each scenario changes the weights applied to capability, price and the other published factors. The hardware facts stay fixed, but the value question changes, so its score and rank can change too.
Useful links & sources
offer frame 2026-10-24–2026-10-29 · formula gpu-value-v1.4 · facts facts-2026-10-29 · Relative Value is an estimate from our current dataset, the selected weights and dated market prices — not an official product rating and not a price forecast. Target prices are calculation thresholds, not predictions. Methodology We are not a shop. Affiliate links may earn us a commission; they never change the calculations or the ranking.